Evaluation and Coordination of Transmission and Generation Scheduled Outages Sample Clauses

Evaluation and Coordination of Transmission and Generation Scheduled Outages. The Parties will utilize network applications to analyze planned critical facility maintenance to determine its effects on the reliability of the transmission system. Each Party’s Scheduled Outage analysis will consider the impact of its critical Scheduled Outages on the other Party’s system reliability, in addition to its own. No Party has the authority to cancel another Party’s Scheduled Outage (except transmission facilities interconnecting the two Parties’ transmission systems). However, the Parties will work together to resolve any identified Scheduled Outage conflicts. The outage coordination could include the possibility of changing the current outage schedule if required. If analysis of Scheduled Outages indicates unacceptable system conditions, the Parties will work with one another and the facility owner(s), as necessary, to provide remedial steps to be taken in advance of proposed maintenance. If an operating procedure cannot be developed, and a change to the proposed schedule is necessary based on significant impact, the Parties shall discuss the facts involved, and make every effort to effect the requested schedule change. If the Parties have identified a sub-set of facilities that would be have significant impacts to reliability during an outage, the Parties will notify each other of applicable emergency maintenance and forced outages on those previously identified facilities as soon as practicable after such conditions are indentified. In relation to these outages, the Parties will evaluate the impact of emergency and forced outages on the Parties’ systems and work together to develop remedial and appropriate steps as necessary. Changes to Scheduled Outages of these facilities, both before or after the work has started, may require additional review. Each Party will consider the impact of these changes on the other Party’s system reliability, in addition to its own. The Parties will contact each other as soon as possible if these changes result in unacceptable system conditions, and will work with one another to develop remedial steps as necessary.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (8)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Evaluation and Coordination of Transmission and Generation Scheduled Outages

  • Use of Interconnection Facilities by Third Parties 6551 Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.9.9.1 Purpose of Interconnection Facilities. 6551

  • Information Submission by Connecting Transmission Owner The initial information submission by Connecting Transmission Owner shall occur no later than one hundred eighty (180) Calendar Days prior to Trial Operation and shall include New York State Transmission System information necessary to allow the Developer to select equipment and meet any system protection and stability requirements, unless otherwise mutually agreed to by the Developer and Connecting Transmission Owner. On a monthly basis Connecting Transmission Owner shall provide Developer and NYISO a status report on the construction and installation of Connecting Transmission Owner’s Attachment Facilities and System Upgrade Facilities and System Deliverability Upgrades, including, but not limited to, the following information: (1) progress to date; (2) a description of the activities since the last report; (3) a description of the action items for the next period; and (4) the delivery status of equipment ordered.

  • Transmission and Routing of Exchange Access Traffic PURSUANT TO 251(c)(2) 13 ARTICLE VI MEET-POINT BILLING ARRANGEMENTS 14 ARTICLE VII BLV/BLVI TRAFFIC 16 7.1 Busy Line Verification 16 7.2 Busy Line Verification Interrupt 16 7.3 BLV/BLVI Traffic 16 7.4 BLV/BLVI Compensation 16

  • Updated Information Submission by Interconnection Customer The updated information submission by the Interconnection Customer, including manufacturer information, shall occur no later than one hundred eighty (180) Calendar Days prior to the Trial Operation. The Interconnection Customer shall submit a completed copy of the Electric Generating Unit data requirements contained in Appendix 1 to the LGIP. It shall also include any additional information provided to the Participating TO and the CAISO for the Interconnection Studies. Information in this submission shall be the most current Electric Generating Unit design or expected performance data. Information submitted for stability models shall be compatible with the Participating TO and CAISO standard models. If there is no compatible model, the Interconnection Customer will work with a consultant mutually agreed to by the Parties to develop and supply a standard model and associated information.

  • Project Monitoring Reporting and Evaluation The Recipient shall furnish to the Association each Project Report not later than forty-five (45) days after the end of each calendar semester, covering the calendar semester.

  • Deduction and Transmission of Fee The Board agrees to deduct from the salary of any Employee who is not a member of the Association for the current membership year the full amount of the representation fee referred to in this ARTICLE, above, and promptly will transmit the installments so deducted to the Association. The Board agrees to deduct the representation fee in equal installments, as nearly as possible, from the paychecks paid to each Employee during the remainder of the membership year in question. The deductions will begin thirty (30) days after the Employee begins his employment in a bargaining unit position.

  • Interconnection Facilities Engineering Procurement and Construction Interconnection Facilities, Network Upgrades, and Distribution Upgrades shall be studied, designed, and constructed pursuant to Good Utility Practice. Such studies, design and construction shall be based on the assumed accuracy and completeness of all technical information received by the Participating TO and the CAISO from the Interconnection Customer associated with interconnecting the Large Generating Facility.

  • Transmission Delivery Service Implications Under ER Interconnection Service, Interconnection Customer will be eligible to inject power from the Generating Facility into and deliver power across the Transmission System on an “as available” basis up to the amount of MW identified in the applicable stability and steady state studies to the extent the upgrades initially required to qualify for ER Interconnection Service have been constructed. After that date FERC makes effective MISO’s Energy Market Tariff filed in Docket No. ER04-691-000, Interconnection Customer may place a bid to sell into the market up to the maximum identified Generating Facility output, subject to any conditions specified in the Interconnection Service approval, and the Generating Facility will be dispatched to the extent the Interconnection Customer’s bid clears. In all other instances, no transmission or other delivery service from the Generating Facility is assured, but Interconnection Customer may obtain Point-To-Point Transmission Service, Network Integration Transmission Service or be used for secondary network transmission service, pursuant to the Tariff, up to the maximum output identified in the stability and steady state studies. In those instances, in order for Interconnection Customer to obtain the right to deliver or inject energy beyond the Point of Interconnection or to improve its ability to do so, transmission delivery service must be obtained pursuant to the provisions of the Tariff. The Interconnection Customer’s ability to inject its Generating Facility output beyond the Point of Interconnection, therefore, will depend on the existing capacity of the Transmission or Distribution System as applicable, at such time as a Transmission Service request is made that would accommodate such delivery. The provision of Firm Point-To-Point Transmission Service or Network Integration Transmission Service may require the construction of additional Network or Distribution Upgrades.

  • Cost Responsibility for Interconnection Facilities and Distribution Upgrades 4.1 Interconnection Facilities 4.2 Distribution Upgrades

  • Points of Interconnection and Trunk Types 2.1 Point(s) of Interconnection. 2.1.1 Each Party, at its own expense, shall provide transport facilities to the technically feasible Point(s) of Interconnection on Verizon’s network in a LATA selected by PNG.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!