Evaluation and Research Sample Clauses

Evaluation and Research. The Agency agrees to participate in research, evaluation studies, or needs assessments sponsored by the Recipient, the Health Resources & Services Administration (“HRSA”), or the HIV/AIDS Health Services Planning Council (hereinafter referred to as “Planning Council”) in order to evaluate the effect of Consumer service activities, or on the appropriateness and quality of Services. In addition, the Agency agrees to actively participate in on-going meetings or task forces aimed to increase, enhance, and maintain coordination and collaboration among HIV/AIDS related health and support agencies. The Agency shall notify the Recipient in advance of any research or studies being conducted or participated in by the Agency that may involve any Consumers receiving Xxxx Xxxxx Part A funded services or Services under this Contract.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Evaluation and Research. Mental health professionals systematically monitor and evaluate their clinical practice, consistent with the National Standards for Mental Health Services and relevant professional standards to ensure the best possible outcomes for consumers, family members and/or carers.
Evaluation and Research. This workstream is led by the University of Kent we have developed a evaluation framework that will enable us to implement and evaluate all the changes to health and social care that we make ensuring that we achieve the desired patient outcomes.
Evaluation and Research. If you don't have a copy of the NASW Code of Ethics, revised in 1999, you can download a copy from NASW, xxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx or you can be connected via the NASW/CT website, xxx.xxxxxx.xxx or if you don't have access to the Internet, you can request a single copy from the chapter office by calling (000) 000-0000. The information presented here is based on the current status of Connecticut and may be subject to change. This fact sheet is for informational purposes only and should not be interpreted as legal advice. tips.
Evaluation and Research. Our Business Intelligence Unit continues to undertake cross analysis of all surveys and qualitative research with potential, current and past students to highlight differences in requirements, satisfaction and experiences of UEA provision for different student groups. In addition to the Non-Academic Experience Survey, other internal surveys which will continue to be analysed in this way include the Reasons for Choice Survey (annual survey of enquirers, applicants and offer holders, exploring decision making and information sources used), Open Day and Applicant Day surveys and monitoring of National Student Survey and UK Engagement Survey responses. In 2015/16, we undertook a tracker project consisting of qualitative interviews with a small (30 students) panel of 1st and 2nd year home undergraduate students across the academic year following their experience of a year at UEA. This helped us to better our understanding of the interplay between different positive and negative factors in the retention and success of our students and any differences in the experience of choosing, studying at and living at UEA between WP and non-WP students. To further our understanding, monitor changes in needs and evaluate impact of newly implemented activity, we have furthered this work by introducing a WP specific group into our annual New Student Focus Group Project and will continue to run the full tracker project every other year. In 2015/2016 UEA’s Business Intelligence Unit also launched an ongoing Exit Survey with students who have withdrawn from the institution or academically failed. At the end of the academic year 2016/17, full statistical analysis of two years’ worth of data will be undertaken including cross analysis by widening participation characteristics. Dashboarding will be designed to allow for live monitoring of trends. This will enable the University to learn more about the reasons behind the non-continuation of widening participation students and take action to address specific trends and issues. Following a successful set of five short term fellowships into specific WP issues, we plan to utilise further the wealth of academic expertise within UEA through funding colleagues in our School of Education and Life Long Learning to undertake an initial scoping review (2016/17) and then a more targeted systematic review (2017/18) into key issues for the success of widening participation students. In 2018/19, we plan to fund further research to investigate key i...

Related to Evaluation and Research

  • TEACHERS AND RESEARCHERS 1. An individual who is a resident of a Contracting State immediately before making a visit to the other Contracting State, and who, at the invitation of any university, college, school or other similar educational institution, visits that other State for a period not exceeding two years solely for the purpose of teaching or research or both at such educational institution shall be exempt from tax in that other State on any remuneration for such teaching or research. 2. This Article shall not apply to income from research if such research is undertaken primarily for the private benefit of a specific person or persons.

  • EVALUATION AND MONITORING The ORGANIZATION agrees to maintain books, records and other documents and evidence, and to use accounting procedures and practices that sufficiently and properly support the complete performance of and the full compliance with this Agreement. The ORGANIZATION will retain these supporting books, records, documents and other materials for at least three (3) calendar years following the year in which the Agreement expires. The COUNTY and/or the State Auditor and any of their representatives shall have full and complete access to these books, records and other documents and evidence retained by the ORGANIZATION respecting all matters covered in and under this Agreement, and shall have the right to examine such during normal business hours as often as the COUNTY and/or the State Auditor may deem necessary. Such representatives shall be permitted to audit, examine and make excerpts or transcripts from such records, and to make audits of all contracts, invoices, materials, and records of matters covered by this Agreement. These access and examination rights shall last for three calendar years following the year in which the Agreement expires. The COUNTY intends without guarantee for its agents to use reasonable security procedures and protections to assure that related records and documents provided by the ORGANIZATION are not erroneously disclosed to third parties. The COUNTY will, however, disclose or make this material available to those authorized by/in the above paragraph or permitted under the provisions of Chapter 42.56 RCW without notice to the ORGANIZATION. The ORGANIZATION shall cooperate with and freely participate in any other monitoring or evaluation activities pertinent to this Agreement that the COUNTY finds needing to be conducted.

  • Research Primary Investigator as part of a multi-site study (25 points) • Co-Investigator as part of a multi-site study (20 points) • Primary Investigator of a facility/unit based research study (15 points) • Co-Investigator of a facility/unit based research study (10 points) • Develops a unit specific research proposal (5 points) • Conducts a literature review as part of a research study (5 points)

  • Evaluation of Students Acknowledging the District’s adopted grading system, the teacher shall maintain the right and responsibility to determine grades and other evaluation of a student. No grade or evaluation shall be changed except by the teacher with the approval of the building administrator.

  • Implementation and Review The Parties shall consult annually, or as otherwise agreed, to review the implementation of this Chapter and consider other matters of mutual interest affecting trade in services. (10) 10 Such consultations will be addressed under Article 170 (Free Trade Commission) of Chapter 14 (Administration of the Agreement).

  • Evaluation 1. The purposes of evaluation provisions include providing employees with feedback, and employers and employees with the opportunity and responsibility to address concerns. Where a grievance proceeds to arbitration, the arbitrator must consider these purposes, and may relieve on just and reasonable terms against breaches of time limits or other procedural requirements.

  • Technology Research Analyst Job# 1810 General Characteristics

  • Evaluation, Testing, and Monitoring 1. The System Agency may review, test, evaluate and monitor Grantee’s Products and services, as well as associated documentation and technical support for compliance with the Accessibility Standards. Review, testing, evaluation and monitoring may be conducted before and after the award of a contract. Testing and monitoring may include user acceptance testing. Neither the review, testing (including acceptance testing), evaluation or monitoring of any Product or service, nor the absence of review, testing, evaluation or monitoring, will result in a waiver of the State’s right to contest the Grantee’s assertion of compliance with the Accessibility Standards. 2. Grantee agrees to cooperate fully and provide the System Agency and its representatives timely access to Products, records, and other items and information needed to conduct such review, evaluation, testing, and monitoring.

  • Investment Analysis and Implementation In carrying out its obligations under Section 1 hereof, the Advisor shall: (a) supervise all aspects of the operations of the Funds; (b) obtain and evaluate pertinent information about significant developments and economic, statistical and financial data, domestic, foreign or otherwise, whether affecting the economy generally or the Funds, and whether concerning the individual issuers whose securities are included in the assets of the Funds or the activities in which such issuers engage, or with respect to securities which the Advisor considers desirable for inclusion in the Funds' assets; (c) determine which issuers and securities shall be represented in the Funds' investment portfolios and regularly report thereon to the Board of Trustees; (d) formulate and implement continuing programs for the purchases and sales of the securities of such issuers and regularly report thereon to the Board of Trustees; and (e) take, on behalf of the Trust and the Funds, all actions which appear to the Trust and the Funds necessary to carry into effect such purchase and sale programs and supervisory functions as aforesaid, including but not limited to the placing of orders for the purchase and sale of securities for the Funds.

  • EVALUATION AND COMPARISON OF BIDS 29.1 The Employer will evaluate and compare only the Bids determined to be substantially responsive in accordance with Clause 26. 29.2 In evaluating the Bids, the Employer will determine for each Bid the evaluated Bid Price by adjusting the Bid Price as follows: (a) Making any correction for errors pursuant to Clause 27; or (b) Making an appropriate adjustments for any other acceptable variations, deviations; and (c) Making appropriate adjustments to reflect discounts or other price modifications offered in accordance with Sub Clause 22.5. 29.3 The Employer reserves the right to accept or reject any variation, deviation, or alternative offer. Variations, deviations, and alternative offers and other factors which are in excess of the requirements of the Bidding documents or otherwise result in unsolicited benefits for the Employer shall not be taken into account in Bid evaluation. 29.4 The estimated effect of the price adjustment conditions under Clause 47 of the Conditions of Contract, during the period of implementation of the Contract, will not be taken into account in Bid evaluation. 29.5 If the Bid of the successful Bidder is seriously unbalanced in relation to the Engineer’s estimate of the cost of work to be performed under the contract, the Employer may require the Bidder to produce detailed price analyses for any or all items of the Bill of Quantities, to demonstrate the internal consistency of those prices with the construction methods and schedule proposed. After evaluation of the price analyses, the Employer may require that the amount of the performance security set forth in Clause 34 be increased at the expense of the successful Bidder to a level sufficient to protect the Employer against financial loss in the event of default of the successful Bidder under the Contract. 30. (Deleted)

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!