Evaluation and Comparison of Tenders. 2.24.1 The Procuring entity will evaluate and compare the tenders which have been determined to be substantially responsive, pursuant to paragraph 2.22
Evaluation and Comparison of Tenders. 2.22.1 The procuring entity will evaluate and compare the tenders which have been determined to be substantially responsive, pursuant to paragraph 2.20
Evaluation and Comparison of Tenders. 2.15.1 The Hospital will evaluate and compare the tenders which have been determined to be substantially responsive, pursuant to paragraph 1.3.
Evaluation and Comparison of Tenders. ITT 33.1 The currency that shall be used for Tender evaluation and comparison purposes only to convert at the selling exchange rate all Tender prices expressed in various currencies into a single currency is: KENYA SHILLINGS The source of exchange rate shall be: The Central bank of Kenya (mean rate) The date for the exchange rate shall be: the deadline date for Submission of the Tenders. For comparison of Tenders, the Tender Price, corrected pursuant to ITT 31, shall first be broken down into the respective amounts payable in various currencies by using the selling exchange rates specified by the Tenderer in accordance with ITT 15.1. In the second step, the Procuring Entity will convert the amounts in various currencies in which the Tender Price is payable (excluding Provisional Sums but including Daywork where priced competitively) to the single currency identified above at the selling rates established for similar transactions by the authority specified and, on the date, stipulated above.
Evaluation and Comparison of Tenders. ITT 29.3 The manner of rectifying quantifiable nonmaterial nonconformities shall be as described below: Based on the average price of the item/ component as quoted in other substantially responsive tenders. If not derivable as aforementioned, then TWWDA will use its best estimate.
Evaluation and Comparison of Tenders. 2.22.1 KoTDA will evaluate and compare the tenders which have been determined to be substantially responsive, pursuant to paragraph 2.20
Evaluation and Comparison of Tenders. ITT 31.1 The currency that shall be used for Tender evaluation and comparison purposes to convert at the selling exchange rate all Tender prices expressed in various currencies into a single currency is: KENYA SHILLINGS ITT 32.3 A margin of preference and/or reservation “SHALL NOT” apply and specify the details.
Evaluation and Comparison of Tenders. ITT 33.1 The currency that shall be used for Tender evaluation and comparison purposes only to convert at the selling exchange rate all Tender prices expressed in various currencies into a single currency is: Kenya Shillings The source of exchange rate shall be: The Central bank of Kenya (mean rate) The date for the exchange rate shall be: the deadline date for Submission of the Tenders. ITT 34.1 Margin of preference allowed or not allowed: N/A ITT 35.1 Evaluation of the Bids: The Procuring Entity shall use the criteria and methodologies listed in PART II – Procuring Entity's Requirements. Responsive bidders shall be award shortlisted in the Framework agreement, Bidders shall be notified of Call of Contracts as and when required F. Award of Contract ITT 50.1 The procedures for making a Procurement-related Complaint are available from the PPRA Website xxx.xxxx.xx.xx or email xxxxxxxxxx@xxxx.xx.xx. If a Tenderer wishes to make a Procurement-related Complaint, the Tenderer should submit its complaint following these procedures, in writing (by the quickest means available, that is either by hand delivery or email to: The Principal Secretary State Department for Broadcasting and Telecommunications. ITT Reference PARTICULARS OF APPENDIX TO INSTRUCTIONS TO TENDERS For the Attention: Head Supply Chain Management Postal Address: P.O Box 30025-00100 Physical Address: Nairobi, Xxxxxxxx Avenue, Teleposta Towers 11th Floor Email: xxxxxxxxxxxxxx@xxx.xx.xx In summary, a Procurement-related Complaint may challenge any of the following: (i) the terms of the Tender Documents; and (ii) the Procuring Entity’s decision to award the contract.
Evaluation and Comparison of Tenders. 2.23.1 St. Xxxxx TTC Kilimambogo will evaluate and compare the tenders which have been determined to be substantially responsive, pursuant to paragraph 2.22.
Evaluation and Comparison of Tenders. 2.24.1 Technical University of Mombasa will evaluate and compare the tenders which have been determined to be substantially responsive, pursuant to paragraph 2.22
