Evaluation Attachments Sample Clauses

Evaluation Attachments. Appendix A: Approved SOW Appendix B: DIP Matrix and Results Status- Overall project and per country Appendix C: Program Strengths and Weaknesses Table Appendix D: Final Evaluation-Malawi Appendix E: Final Evaluation-Guatemala Appendix F: Final Evaluation-Peru Appendix G: List of persons/groups interviewed Appendix H: Bibliography Appendix I: VHB Photographs Project HOPE received a USAID Matching Grant for the period 1998 – 2003 in order to replicate HOPE’s Village Health Bank methodology which integrates access to credit with health education for impoverished women to three new countries: Malawi, Guatemala, and Peru. The overall objective was to alleviate poverty and it’s effects on women and children by increasing incomes and improving health conditions and personal well-being. Specific program goals to achieve this objective include: • Strengthened capacity of Project HOPE to implement successful Village Health Bank Programs • To provide valued financial services and health education in a sustainable manner • To improve income and health levels of impoverished women and children
Sample 1

Related to Evaluation Attachments

  • Attachments This contract consists of 7 pages including the following attachments which are incorporated herein: Attachment A - Statement of Work Attachment B - Payment Provisions Attachment C – “Standard State Provisions for Contracts and Grants” a preprinted form (revision date 12/15/2017)

  • Requested                           Attachments Pricing Form 1 (Part 1) 230104 Pricing Form 1 (Part 1).xlsx Pricing Form 2 (Part 1) 230104 Pricing Form 2 (Part 1).xlsx

  • Evaluation Reports Where a formal evaluation of an employee's performance is carried out, the employee shall be provided with a copy to read and review. Provision shall be made on the evaluation form for an employee to sign it. The form shall provide for the employee's signature in two (2) places, one indicating that the employee has read and accepts the evaluation, and the other indicating that the employee disagrees with the evaluation. The employee shall sign in one of the places provided within seven (7) calendar days. No employee may initiate a grievance regarding the contents of an evaluation report unless the signature indicates disagreement with the evaluation. The employee shall receive a copy of the evaluation report at the time of signing. An evaluation report shall not be changed after an employee has signed it, without the knowledge of the employee, and any such changes shall be subject to the grievance procedure.

  • Project Monitoring Reporting and Evaluation The Recipient shall furnish to the Association each Project Report not later than forty-five (45) days after the end of each calendar semester, covering the calendar semester.

  • Annexes, Appendices and Footnotes The annexes, appendices and footnotes to this Agreement constitute an integral part of this Agreement.

  • Exhibits and Attachments The following exhibits and attachments are included hereto and incorporated by reference herein: Exhibit A—Services Exhibit B—Payments and rates Attachment I—§504 Compliance

  • Submission of Grievance Information a. Upon appointment of the arbitrator, the appealing party shall, within five (5) days after notice of appointment, forward to the arbitrator, with a copy to the School Board, the submission of the grievance which shall include the following: 1. The issues involved. 2. Statement of the facts. 3. Position of the grievant. 4. The written documents relating to Section 5 of the grievance procedure.

  • Contract Changes Changes may not be made in the terms and conditions of this contract without the agreement and written permission of the Director of Residence Life or the Director’s designee.

  • Proposed Policies and Procedures Regarding New Online Content and Functionality By October 31, 2017, the School will submit to OCR for its review and approval proposed policies and procedures (“the Plan for New Content”) to ensure that all new, newly-added, or modified online content and functionality will be accessible to people with disabilities as measured by conformance to the Benchmarks for Measuring Accessibility set forth above, except where doing so would impose a fundamental alteration or undue burden. a) When fundamental alteration or undue burden defenses apply, the Plan for New Content will require the School to provide equally effective alternative access. The Plan for New Content will require the School, in providing equally effective alternate access, to take any actions that do not result in a fundamental alteration or undue financial and administrative burdens, but nevertheless ensure that, to the maximum extent possible, individuals with disabilities receive the same benefits or services as their nondisabled peers. To provide equally effective alternate access, alternates are not required to produce the identical result or level of achievement for persons with and without disabilities, but must afford persons with disabilities equal opportunity to obtain the same result, to gain the same benefit, or to reach the same level of achievement, in the most integrated setting appropriate to the person’s needs. b) The Plan for New Content must include sufficient quality assurance procedures, backed by adequate personnel and financial resources, for full implementation. This provision also applies to the School’s online content and functionality developed by, maintained by, or offered through a third-party vendor or by using open sources. c) Within thirty (30) days of receiving OCR’s approval of the Plan for New Content, the School will officially adopt, and fully implement the amended policies and procedures.

  • Evaluation Report The state must provide a narrative summary of the evaluation design, status (including evaluation activities and findings to date), and plans for evaluation activities during the extension period. The narrative is to include, but not be limited to, describing the hypotheses being tested and any results available.