Evaluation Criteria and Process Sample Clauses

Evaluation Criteria and Process. All proposals received from contractors will be reviewed and evaluated by a committee of qualified University personnel. Selection and award of contracts will be made to the supplier(s) whose proposal, in the sole opinion of Kent State University, represents the best overall value to the University. Factors which determine the award include, but will not be limited to, the following: The proposer’s responsiveness to all specifications in the RFP, quality of the proposer’s products and/or services, ability to fulfill the contract, and general responsibility as evidence of past performance. Payment terms and cash discounts will be considered as determining factors in the contract award Proposals will be reviewed and evaluated according, but not limited, to the criteria listed herein. As a part of the evaluation process, the university has assigned a component rating (0 to 5 – Poor to Excellent) to each area defined in the criteria section. The component rating will be applied to the evaluation criteria of this proposal. Selection of the successful vendor will be determined by the proposal(s) that best serves the interest of the university.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Evaluation Criteria and Process

  • Evaluation Criteria 5.2.1. The responses will be evaluated based on the following: (edit evaluation criteria below as appropriate for your project)

  • Evaluation Process A. The immediate supervisor will meet with an employee at the start of the employee’s probationary, trial services, transition, and annual review period to discuss performance expectations. The employee will receive copies of their performance expectations as well as notification of any modifications made during the review period. Employee work performance will be evaluated during probationary, trial service and transition review periods and at least annually thereafter. Notification will be given to a probationary or trial service employee whose work performance is determined to be unsatisfactory.

  • Evaluation Cycle Goal Setting and Development of the Educator Plan

  • Evaluation Plan The systematic blueprint detailing the evaluation aspects of the project.

  • Evaluation Forms a. Performance evaluation forms will at a minimum have:

  • Evaluation Procedure The procedural requirements set forth in this agreement to provide specificity to the statutory obligations established under sections 3319.111 and 3319.112 of the Ohio Revised Code and to conform to the framework for the evaluation of teachers developed under section 3319.112 of the Ohio Revised Code.

  • Additional RO Review Criteria (1) In addition to the requirements in Subparagraph 34A, the RO must:

  • PROCEDURES AND/OR CRITERIA FOR COURSE ARTICULATION a. Complete the ROP Careers with Children course at Freedom High School with a grade of “B” or better.

  • Study An application for leave of absence for professional study must be supported by a written statement indicating what study or research is to be undertaken, or, if applicable, what subjects are to be studied and at what institutions.

  • Benchmarks 2.1 Benchmarks set forth the overall scope and level of responsibility and the typical duties by which jobs or positions are distinguished and classified under the Classification System.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.