SELECTION AND AWARD Sample Clauses

SELECTION AND AWARD. 1. The final decision regarding the award of the Master Price Agreements will be made by the Sourcing Team, and the award of Participating Addenda will be made by each participating state, independently. 2. Notification of the contract awards will be made in writing.

SELECTION AND AWARD. 13.1 Bidders are cautioned to submit enough information to enable the evaluation committee to fully ascertain each Bidder’s capability to do all the requirements of this contract. Cover each item in sufficient detail to clearly address the required information. This should preclude a Proposal from being returned as incomplete or rejected because a required topic was not addressed. 13.2 All commitments made by a Bidder in their Proposal will become part of the resultant contract. Submitted data should be complete and concise, but not overly elaborate. 13.3 Excessive reliance on promotional brochures is discouraged. 13.4 Bidders are advised their Proposal is presumed to represent their best efforts to respond to this solicitation. Apparent inconsistencies between promised performance and their proposed Pricing shall be fully explained by the Bidder. 13.5 The burden of proof of financial and price credibility rests solely on the Bidder. Any significant inconsistency, if explained, raises a fundamental issue of the Bidder’s understanding of the project management and resources required and/or their ability to perform the contract. This may be grounds for rejection of their Proposal, or basis for determination of non-responsibility. 13.6 Bidders may, at the discretion of the ODR, be asked to provide more information and/or clarifications regarding their Proposals. 13.7 The Bidder shall be held responsible for the validity of all information supplied in their Proposal. Title page of Proposal shall contain the following statement: “The information contained in this Proposal is accurate and true to the best of my knowledge.” 13.8 In no case shall words like “we will comply with the requirements of the contract” or equivalent statements be acceptable in meeting the requirements of this solicitation. 13.9 Failure to comply with all the requirements of this solicitation may result in ▇▇▇▇▇▇’s Proposal being summarily rejected. 13.10 Award of the Contract resulting from this solicitation shall be under the source selection procedures described herein. A committee of qualified personnel will evaluate each Proposal submitted in response to this solicitation. Weights will be assigned to the three (3) categories of primary importance, and the decision of the ODR regarding assignment of weights will be final. The categories of primary importance are as follows: A. Project Management Ability, 30% B. Company Experience in Higher Education, 35% C. Price Proposal, 35% 13.11 Fo...

SELECTION AND AWARD. Meet with the City to review rankings and make the selection. Provide the City with a recommendation for award and prepare a notice of intent to award letter for distribution by the City.

SELECTION AND AWARD. Quotes must demonstrate a clear understanding of the nature and scope of the work required. Failure to provide a realistic, reasonable and complete quote may reflect a lack of understanding of the requirements and may result in a determination that the vendor is technically unacceptable. Generally speaking, generic information may receive a lower rating than information well tailored to the selection factors. Technical Quotations are weighted as such: 50% for past performance, 25% for technical capability and capacity, and 25% for key personnel. The technical factors, when combined, are more important than price. Price will be considered and evaluated in determining the overall best value to the Government. As the technical merits of the quotes become more equal, price may become the determining factor. A single award BPA will be established with the responsible contractor whose quote conforms to the requirements outlined in this RFP and is most advantageous to the Government based on the best value determination. This section provides instructions on how to prepare and submit a quotation in response to this solicitation.

SELECTION AND AWARD. If the Town is unable to reach an agreement with the first-ranked Contractor, the Town shall terminate further discussions with the first-ranked Contractor, and commence negotiations with the next-ranked Contractor, in the order of the selection ranking until an agreement is reached, or all Proposals are rejected. Time is of the essence, and the award of the contract to the successful Contractor is expressly conditioned upon (1) the Contractor’s execution and delivery of the Contract, and delivery of all required bonds and evidence of insurance, within ten (10) calendar days after the Contractor is notified of the acceptance of its Proposal, and (ii) the Contractor’s timely fulfillment of any and all other preconditions expressly set forth in the Contract Documents. Should the Contractor fail to timely execute and deliver the contract, required bonds, evidence of insurance, or fail to timely fulfill any other such preconditions, the Town may, at its option and discretion, without releasing, impairing or affecting its right to receive the Proposal security as damages for such failure, rescind the award, commence negotiations with the next ranked Contractor, or may reject all Proposals. There will be no contractual obligation on the part of the Town to any Contractor, nor will any firm have any property interest or other right in the contract or work being proposed, unless and until the Agreement is unconditionally executed and delivered by all parties, all submittals required by the Proposal Documents and Agreement and all conditions to be fulfilled by the selected firm have either been so fulfilled by the firm, or waived in writing by the firm or Town, as applicable.

SELECTION AND AWARD. The City reserves the right to reject any and all proposals in its absolute discretion. All proposals are subject to the laws of the State of Indiana.

SELECTION AND AWARD. The City of Columbia reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, to negotiate with any offeror considered qualified, or to make an award without further discussion. The City of Columbia reserves the right to award contracts to multiple vendors if deemed in the best interest of the City of Columbia. PROPOSAL Executive Recruitment Services for City Manager Due Date: December 12, 2018 SUBMITTED BY: ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ CPS HR Consulting ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ P: ▇▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇@▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇ Tax ID: ▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇ Your Path to Performance December 12, 2018 Finance /Purchasing Division ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇, CPPB City of Columbia ▇▇▇ ▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, 5th Floor Columbia, MO 65201 Dear ▇▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇: CPS HR Consulting (CPS HR) is pleased to have the opportunity to submit a proposal to assist the City of Columbia (City) with the recruitment of a new City Manager. We are uniquely qualified to undertake this effort as we have vast experience in assisting public agencies with executive search, screening, and placement. We understand that each agency is unique, and our extensive experience allows us to tailor our process to specifically meet your needs. Our work with local government agencies throughout the United States gives us an in-depth understanding of government operations, programs, and services. Each recruitment is an opportunity to shape and prepare your organization for the future. We understand how important this transition is for you and are perfectly placed to assist you in this endeavor. Mr. ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ will serve as project manager for this engagement. He has practical experience as a City Manager and Deputy County Administrator, and extensive recruiting experience. His recent clients have included the Town of Paradise Valley, AZ and the City of University City, MO. It is our commitment to work in partnership with your organization to a successful result. Thank you for the opportunity to be considered for this assignment. This proposal is valid for a period of 90 days from the submittal due date of December 12, 2018. Should you have questions or comments about the information presented in this proposal, please contact ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ at ▇▇▇▇▇▇@▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇ or (▇▇▇) ▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇. Sincerely, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ Senior Practice Leader, Products and Services Executive Summary 1 Recruitment Experts 1 Agency Information 3 About CPS HR 3 Primary Contact Person 4 Executive Recruitment Team 4 Current Recruitments Status 6 References 7 Methodology 8 Key Stakeh...

SELECTION AND AWARD. Quotes must demonstrate a clear understanding of the nature and scope of the work required. Failure to provide a realistic, reasonable and complete quote may reflect a lack of understanding of the requirements and may result in a determination that the vendor is technically unacceptable. Generally speaking, generic information may receive a lower rating than information well tailored to the selection factors. Technical Quotations are weighted as such: 50% for past performance, 25% for technical capability and capacity, and 25% for key personnel. The technical factors, when combined, are more important than price. Price will be considered and evaluated in determining the overall best value to the Government. As the technical merits of the quotes become more equal, price may become the determining factor. A single award BPA will be established with the responsible contractor whose quote conforms to the requirements outlined in this RFP and is most advantageous to the Government based on the best value determination.