Evaluation Measures Clause Samples

The Evaluation Measures clause defines the criteria and methods used to assess the performance or quality of a product, service, or deliverable under a contract. It typically outlines specific metrics, benchmarks, or standards that must be met, such as response times, accuracy rates, or compliance with industry norms. By clearly establishing how success or failure will be determined, this clause ensures both parties have a mutual understanding of expectations and provides an objective basis for performance review or dispute resolution.
Evaluation Measures. 3.4.1 Teachers will be evaluated in accordance with Education Code section 44662 regarding the four evaluation criteria: 1) The progress of students toward the grade level standards; 2) The instructional techniques and strategies; 3) The employee’s adherence to curricular objectives; and 4) The establishment and maintenance of a suitable learning environment. The California Standards for the Teaching Profession shall be used as the tool for teacher evaluation. Unit member performance shall be evaluated and assessed as it reasonably relates to:
View SourceView Similar (2)
Evaluation Measures. 3.4.1 Teachers will be evaluated in accordance with Education Code section 44662 regarding the four evaluation criteria: 1) The progress of students toward the grade level standards;
View SourceView Similar (2)
Evaluation Measures. The evaluation must use outcome measures to evaluate the impact of these activities on the efficient operation of the state’s health care system during the period of the demonstration. The outcome measures below represent agreed-upon metrics under which the state and CMS can measure the shared financial benefit of the health care reforms and must be included in the evaluation design: i. Nursing home admissions - “Value of Averted Medicaid Nursing Home Admissions”: For each fiscal year under the demonstration, the number of the reduction in the number of Demonstration Year (DY) Medicaid bed-days below Base Year (BY) level * average cost per bed-day * DY Medicaid enrollees. ii. Reduction in Medicaid debt payment for hospitals - “Value of Avoided Inpatient Debt Payments”: For each fiscal year under the demonstration, the reduction in the total inpatient debt per discharge from Base Year (BY) level * Medicaid discharges.
View Source
Evaluation Measures. The evaluation and assessment of the overall performance and competence of teaching employees shall include the findings of a documented classroom observation(s) conducted by the evaluator(s) unless due to the unavailability of the employee. The evaluation document should include but not be limited to: a. Description of the employee’s assignment; b. Instructional techniques and strategies used by the employee; c. Employee’s adherence to the curricular objectives; d. Maintenance of a suitable learning environment within the scope of the employee’s responsibility; e. Adherence to the California State Standards for the Teaching Profession (CSTP), (revised 2024); f. Involvement(s) on site-based committees or with activities, (e.g. Leadership, Red Ribbon Week, Go Green Week, etc.). g. Commendations and recommendations
View Source
Evaluation Measures. The evaluation must use outcome measures to evaluate the impact of these activities on the efficient operation of the state’s health care system during the period of the demonstration. The outcome measures below represent agreed-upon metrics under which the state and CMS can measure the shared financial benefit of the health care reforms and must be included in the evaluation design: i. Nursing home admissions - “Value of Averted Medicaid Nursing Home Admissions”: For each fiscal year under the demonstration, the number of the reduction in the number of Demonstration Year (DY) Medicaid bed-days below Base Year (BY) level * average cost per bed-day * DY Medicaid enrollees.
View Source

Related to Evaluation Measures

  • Taxation Measures 1. Except as provided in this Article nothing in this Agreement shall apply to taxation measures. 2. Nothing in this Agreement shall affect the rights and obligations of the Parties under any tax convention. In the event of any inconsistency between the provision of this Agreement and any such convention, the provisions of that convention shall apply to the extent of the inconsistency. 3. Without prejudice to the application of paragraph 2, the disciplines referred to hereinafter shall apply to taxation measures: (a) Article 7 (National Treatment) of Chapter 2 (National Treatment and Market Access for Goods) and such other provisions of this Agreement as are necessary to give effect to that Article to the same extent as does Article III of the GATT 1994; and (b) Article 106 (National Treatment) of Chapter 8 (Trade in Services), subject to the exceptions provided for in Article XIV letters (d) and (e) of the GATS, which are hereby incorporated. 4. The provisions of Article 133 (Expropriation) and Annex 9 (Expropriation) of this Chapter shall apply to taxation measures alleged to be expropriatory. 5. The provisions of Article 139 (Investor-State Dispute Settlement) apply with respect to paragraph 4 of this Article. 6. If an investor invokes Article 133 (Expropriation) and Annex 9 (Expropriation) of this Chapter as the basis of a claim to arbitration according to Article 139 (Investor-State Dispute Settlement), the following procedure shall apply: The investor must first refer to the competent tax authorities described in subparagraph 7(c), at the time that it gives written notice of intent under Article 139 (Investor-State Dispute Settlement), the issue of whether the tax measure concerned involves an expropriation. In case of such referral, the competent tax authorities shall consult. Only if, within 6 months of the referral, they do not reach an agreement that the measure does not involve an expropriation, or in case the competent tax authorities of the Parties fail to consult with each other, the investor may submit its claim to arbitration under Article 139 (Investor-State Dispute Settlement).

  • Interim Measures 6.1 The Parties acknowledge that the British Columbia Claims Task Force made the following recommendation concerning interim measures:

  • General Measures Employees experiencing family violence have a right to request flexible working arrangements including changes to working times. Such requests will not be unreasonably refused.

  • Performance Measures The System Agency will monitor the Grantee’s performance of the requirements in Attachment A and compliance with the Contract’s terms and conditions.