Common use of Evaluation of a Probationer Clause in Contracts

Evaluation of a Probationer. A. Evaluation of a probationer may include quarterly student evaluations, student compliments, student complaints, classroom observation, peer evaluation, supervisory evaluation, self-evaluation, committee work, and curriculum design. This evaluation must include performance against criteria established by the faculty/administrative unit and reviewed when a new probationer is hired. If the unit does not establish criteria, the unit administrator may establish the necessary criteria for evaluation of a probationer. The criteria must be reviewed and discussed by the tenure review committee and may be revised to fit the needs of an individual probationer by the agreement of the committee. B. The tenure review committee will be responsible for furnishing the probationer with appropriate performance criteria and objectives in written form, to include the methods of performance evaluation to be used. The committee will hold a minimum of one (1) quarterly review conference with the probationer. The substance of these conferences will be recorded in written form and will be forwarded through administrative channels to the appropriate vice-president or campus president. Observed areas needing improvement should be put in writing and discussed in conference as soon as possible. A professional improvement plan intended to address these areas must be developed and reviewed by the committee. Both the committee and the probationer must be aware that the primary purpose of the committee, in addition to monitoring and evaluation, is to assist the probationer in meeting the requirements of assigned duties and in fulfilling the objectives set by the committee. C. As an indication that the probationer has knowledge of all probationary information, the written records of all conferences, reports, and evaluations will be disclosed to and signed by the probationer by the end of the quarter in which they are produced, or, if not available at that time, no later than the following quarter. D. The tenure review committee members will each arrange at least one (1) of the following per quarter (excluding xxxxxxx) with teaching probationers: a classroom observation, an evaluation of committee work, or an evaluation of the probationer’s curriculum. These observations and evaluations will be recorded in written form as part of the probationer's evaluation materials. E. Documents other than those produced or requested by members of the tenure review committee will not be placed in the tenure record except by the agreement of the members of the committee. Probationers have the right to respond in writing for the record to any documents placed in their record. If complaints of substance that may affect the decision are brought to a committee meeting or to committee members, and the probationer has not been previously informed, a decision by the committee will be deferred for at least two (2) working days to provide the probationer an opportunity to respond before a decision is made.

Evaluation of a Probationer. A. Evaluation of a probationer may include quarterly student evaluations, student compliments, student complaintsresponse, classroom observation, peer evaluation, supervisory evaluation, and self-evaluation, committee work, and curriculum design. This evaluation must include performance against criteria established by the faculty/administrative unit and reviewed when a new probationer is hired. If the unit does not establish criteria, the unit administrator may establish the necessary criteria for evaluation of a probationer. The criteria must be reviewed and discussed by the tenure review committee and may be revised to fit the needs of an individual probationer by the agreement of the committee. B. The tenure review committee will be responsible for furnishing the probationer with appropriate performance criteria and objectives in written form, to include the methods of performance evaluation to be used. The committee will hold a minimum of one (1) quarterly review conference with the probationer. The substance of these conferences will be recorded in written form and will be forwarded through administrative channels to the appropriate vice-president or campus president. Observed areas needing improvement should be put in writing and discussed in conference as soon as possible. A professional improvement plan intended to address these areas must be developed and reviewed by the committee. Both the committee and the probationer must be aware that the primary purpose of the committee, in addition to monitoring and evaluation, is to assist the probationer in meeting the requirements of assigned duties and in fulfilling the objectives set by the committee. C. As an indication that the probationer has knowledge of all probationary information, the written records of all conferences, reports, and evaluations will be disclosed to and signed by the probationer by the end of the quarter in which they are produced, or, if not available at that time, no later than the following quarter. D. The tenure review committee members will each arrange at least one (1) of the following classroom visit per quarter (excluding xxxxxxx) with teaching probationers: a classroom observation, an evaluation of committee work, or an evaluation of the probationer’s curriculum. These visits and the resulting observations and evaluations will be recorded in written form as part of the probationer's evaluation materials. E. Documents other than those produced or requested by members of the tenure review committee will not be placed in the tenure record except by the agreement of the members of the committee. Probationers have the right to respond in writing for the record to any documents placed in their record. If complaints of substance that may affect the decision are brought to a committee meeting or to committee members, and the probationer has not been previously informed, a decision by the committee will be deferred for at least two (2) working days to provide the probationer an opportunity to respond before a decision is made.

Evaluation of a Probationer. A. 1. Evaluation of a probationer may include quarterly student evaluations, student compliments, student complaintsresponse, classroom observation, peer evaluation, supervisory evaluation, and self-evaluation, committee work, and curriculum design. This evaluation must include performance against criteria established by the faculty/administrative unit and reviewed when a new probationer is hired. If the unit does not establish criteria, the unit administrator may establish the necessary criteria for evaluation of a probationer. The criteria must be reviewed and discussed by the tenure Core Status review committee and may be revised to fit the needs of an individual probationer by the agreement of the committee. B. 2. The tenure Core Status review committee will be responsible for furnishing the probationer with appropriate performance criteria and objectives in written form, to include the methods of performance evaluation to be used. The committee will hold a minimum of one (1) quarterly review conference (excluding xxxxxxx) with the probationer. The substance of these conferences will be recorded in written form and will be forwarded through sent via administrative channels including the executive xxxx, if appropriate, to the appropriate vice-president or campus president. Observed areas needing improvement should be put in writing and discussed in conference with the probationer as soon as possible. A professional improvement plan intended to address these areas must be developed and reviewed by the committee. Both the committee and the probationer must be aware that the primary purpose of the committee, in addition to monitoring and evaluation, is to assist the probationer in meeting the requirements of assigned duties and in fulfilling the objectives set by the committee. C. 3. As an indication that the probationer has knowledge of all probationary information, the written records of all conferences, reports, and evaluations will be disclosed to and signed by the probationer by the end of the quarter in which they are produced, or, if not available at that time, no later than the following quarterquarter (excluding xxxxxxx). D. 4. The tenure Core Status review committee members will each arrange at least one (1) of the following classroom observation per quarter (excluding xxxxxxx) with teaching probationers: a classroom observation, an evaluation of committee work, or an evaluation of the probationer’s curriculum. These observations and evaluations will be recorded in written form as part of the probationer's evaluation materials. E. 5. Documents other than those produced or requested by members of the tenure Core Status review committee will not be placed in the tenure Core status record except by the agreement of the members of the committee. Probationers have the right to respond in writing for the record to any documents placed in their record. If complaints of substance that may affect the decision are brought to a committee meeting or to committee members, and the probationer has not been previously informed, a decision by the committee will be deferred for at least two (2) working days to provide the probationer an opportunity to respond before a decision is made.

Evaluation of a Probationer. A. 1. Evaluation of a probationer may include quarterly student evaluations, student compliments, student complaints, classroom observation, peer evaluation, supervisory evaluation, self-evaluation, committee work, and curriculum design. This evaluation must include performance against criteria established by the faculty/administrative unit and reviewed when a new probationer is hired. If the unit does not establish criteria, the unit administrator may establish the necessary criteria for evaluation of a probationer. The criteria must be reviewed and discussed by the tenure Core Status review committee and may be revised to fit the needs of an individual probationer by the agreement of the committee. B. 2. The tenure Core Status review committee will be responsible for furnishing the probationer with appropriate performance criteria and objectives in written form, to include the methods of performance evaluation to be used. The committee will hold a minimum of one (1) quarterly review conference (excluding xxxxxxx) with the probationer. The substance of these conferences will be recorded in written form and will be forwarded through sent via administrative channels including the executive xxxx, if appropriate, to the appropriate vice-president or campus president. Observed areas needing improvement should be put in writing and discussed in conference with the probationer as soon as possible. A professional improvement plan intended to address these areas must be developed and reviewed by the committee. Both the committee and the probationer must be aware that the primary purpose of the committee, in addition to monitoring and evaluation, is to assist the probationer in meeting the requirements of assigned duties and in fulfilling the objectives set by the committee. C. 3. As an indication that the probationer has knowledge of all probationary information, the written records of all conferences, reports, and evaluations will be disclosed to and signed by the probationer by the end of the quarter in which they are produced, or, if not available at that time, no later than the following quarterquarter (excluding xxxxxxx). D. 4. The tenure Core Status review committee members will each arrange at least one (1) of the following per quarter (excluding xxxxxxx) with teaching probationers: a classroom observation, an evaluation of committee work, or an evaluation of the probationer’s curriculum. These observations and evaluations will be recorded in written form as part of the probationer's evaluation materials. E. 5. Documents other than those produced or requested by members of the tenure Core Status review committee will not be placed in the tenure Core status record except by the agreement of the members of the committee. Probationers have the right to respond in writing for the record to any documents placed in their record. If complaints of substance that may affect the decision are brought to a committee meeting or to committee members, and the probationer has not been previously informed, a decision by the committee will be deferred for at least two (2) working days to provide the probationer an opportunity to respond before a decision is made.