Evaluation of consequences Sample Clauses

Evaluation of consequences. Participants were then provided with information regarding some of the potential consequences of the implementation of the specific FCH application. Each of the consequences was related to one potential benefit/cost of the application. This information was carefully designed and reviewed by experts in the consortium. Participants were then asked to rate each of the consequences in a scale from 1 to 5 (from very negative to very positive). The main objective of this exercise was to allow for an informed evaluation of the application by the participants. The exercise was based on the Information Choice Questionnaire (Best- waldhober & Xxxxxx, 2006b).
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Evaluation of consequences for residential hydrogen fuel cells (mean per country and consequence) BE (M) FR (M) DE (M) NO (M) SL (M) ES (M) UK (M) Difference (eta) They would reduce the need to purchase elec- tricity from a power company 4.21 4.13 4.27 4.08 4.32 4.22 4.07 .108 They would reduce CO2 emissions 4.26 4.20 4.41 4.23 4.44 4.28 4.19 .111 Initial capital costs 2.55 2.75 2.64 2.59 2.55 2.43 2.63 .073
Sample 1Sample 2
Evaluation of consequences. Table 17 shows respondents’ evaluation of various consequences generally associated to hydro- gen vehicles. Seven consequences regarding the potential impacts of FCEVs were briefly intro- duced to study participants. Then, they were asked to evaluate, in a scale from 1 to 5, where 1 means very negative and 5 means very positive, each of the consequences. The data show that the three consequences evaluated in the total sample as the most positive are the fact that “they will reduce the need for petroleum” (86% of participants rated it as a posi- tive or very positive consequence, M= 4.31), it “would produce lower CO2 emissions than con- ventional cars” (86%, M= 4.30) and the “price of hydrogen” (79%, M= 4.06). The “range” and “safety issues” were, on average, as positive to not important consequences (M= 3.53 and 2.89 respectively). The “infrastructure needed” and “price of fuel cell material” were rated as some- how negative consequences (M= 2.53 and 2.24 respectively). In terms of agreement between participants, we find that the three consequences rated as more positive (reduction of the need for petroleum, lower CO2 emissions and price of hydrogen) gen- erate a greater degree of agreement (standard deviations between 0.80 and 0.94). Participants agree less on their evaluation of the two consequences rated as more negative; infrastructure needed and the price of fuel cell material (standard deviations between 1.32 and 1.28).
Sample 1Sample 2
Evaluation of consequences. Table 8 shows respondents’ evaluation of distinct consequences associated to residential FCHs. Six consequences regarding the potential impacts of installing residential FCHs were introduced to study participants by presenting them a short text for each consequence (see Figure 15). Then, respondents were asked to evaluate, in a scale from 1 to 5, where 1 means very negative and 5 means very positive, each of the consequences. The data show that the three consequences evaluated as the most positive are the fact that “it will reduce the cost of producing energy” (86% of participants rate it as a positive or very posi- tive consequence, M= 4.3), that it “would reduce CO2 emissions” (86%, M= 4.3) and that they would reduce the need to purchase electricity from the power company (85%, M= 4.2). The “house space requirements” and the “potential risks” are, on average, rated as not important- positive consequences (M= 3.8 and 3.2 respectively). The initial capital costs is rated as a nega- tive-neutral consequence (M= 2.6). In terms of agreement between participants, we find that the three consequences rated as more positive (reduction of the need to purchase electricity, CO2 emissions and lower cost of energy production) generate a greater degree of agreement (SD= 0.82 and SD=0.84). Participants agree less on their evaluation of the house space requirements and the risks of the installation (SD= 1.10). The initial capital costs is the consequence generating a lower degree of agreement be- tween participants (SD= 1.26) (Table 8). Table 8. Evaluation of consequences for residential hydrogen fuel cells (in % and mean, all coun- tries) Very negative (1) Negative (2) Not im- portant (3) Posi- tive (4) Very positive (5) M SD They would reduce the need to purchase electricity from a power company 1% 3% 11% 46% 39% 4.18 0.82 They would reduce CO2 emissions 1 2 11 39 47 4.29 0.82 Initial capital costs 25 27 19 22 7 2.59 1.26 It will reduce the cost of producing energy 1 3 10 38 49 4.30 0.84 Similar risks to other fuels 6 24 24 34 12 3.21 1.11 In terms of differences between countries in the evaluation of the consequences, we find signifi- cant but small differences, with the exception of the evaluation of the consequence “house space requirements” (eta= .272), which generates higher differences between the countries. Taking into account all the consequences evaluated, there is a more positive general evaluation of the consequences in Germany (M= 3.86) and Slovenia (3.89) ...
Sample 1

Related to Evaluation of consequences

  • Duration of Consent Customer consent to receive electronic delivery of Customer Account Documents will be effective immediately and will remain in effect unless and until either the Customer or the Broker revokes it. The Customer understands that it may take up to three (3) business days to process a revocation of consent to electronic delivery, and that the Customer may receive electronic notifications until such consent is processed.

  • Effect of cessation or determination of Agreement 35. (1) On the cessation or determination of this Agreement —

  • Financial Consequences The Department reserves the right to impose financial consequences when the Contractor fails to comply with the requirements of the Contract. The following financial consequences will apply for the Contractor’s non-performance under the Contract. The Customer and the Contractor may agree to add additional Financial Consequences on an as-needed basis beyond those stated herein to apply to that Customer’s resultant contract or purchase order. The State of Florida reserves the right to withhold payment or implement other appropriate remedies, such as Contract termination or nonrenewal, when the Contractor has failed to comply with the provisions of the Contract. The Contractor and the Department agree that financial consequences for non-performance are an estimate of damages which are difficult to ascertain and are not penalties. The financial consequences below will be paid and received by the Department of Management Services within 30 calendar days from the due date specified by the Department. These financial consequences below are individually assessed for failures over each target period beginning with the first full month or quarter of the Contract performance and every month or quarter, respectively, thereafter. Deliverable Performance Metric Performance Due Date Financial Consequence for Non-Performance Contractor will timely submit completed Quarterly Sales Reports All Quarterly Sales Reports will be submitted timely with the required information Reports are due on or before the 30th calendar day after the close of each State fiscal quarter $250 per Calendar Day late/not received by the Contract Manager Contractor will timely submit completed MFMP Transaction Fee Reports All MFMP Transaction Fee Reports will be submitted timely with the required information Reports are due on or before the 15th calendar day after the close of each month $100 per Calendar Day late/not received by the Contract Manager Failure to timely provide Quarterly Sales Reports, transaction fee reports, or other reports as required will result in the imposition of financial consequences and repeated failures or non- payment of financial consequences owed under this Contract may result in the Contractor being found in default and the termination of the Contract. No favorable action will be considered when Contractor has outstanding Contract Quarterly Sales Reports, MFMP Transaction Fee Reports, or any other documentation owed to the Department or Customer, to include fees / monies, that is required under this Contract.

  • Exclusion of Consequential Loss Except as expressly provided otherwise in clause 27 or the IRMP Provisions which form part of this Agreement under clause 3, neither Party is liable to the other under or in connection with this Agreement (including under an indemnity) for any Consequential Loss however caused (including any breach of this Agreement or negligent act or omission of a Party).

  • Mitigation of Harmful Effects To mitigate, to the extent practicable, any harmful effect 8 that is known to CONTRACTOR of a use or disclosure of DHCS PI or PII by CONTRACTOR or its 9 subcontractors in violation of this Personal Information Privacy and Security Contract.

  • Exclusion of Consequential Damages ‌ Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary, neither Party will be liable under this Agreement or under any cause of action relating to the subject matter of this Agreement for any special, indirect, incidental, punitive, exemplary or consequential damages, including loss of profits, loss of use of any property or claims of customers or contractors of the Parties for any such damages.

  • Interpretation of the Agreement The laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania shall govern this Agreement.

  • Tax Consequences It is intended that the Merger shall constitute a “reorganization” within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code, and that this Agreement shall constitute a “plan of reorganization” for purposes of Sections 354 and 361 of the Code.

  • Interpretation of Agreement It is understood that the parties hereto intend this Agreement to be interpreted and enforced so as to provide indemnification to Indemnitee to the fullest extent now or hereafter permitted by law.

  • Exclusion of Consequential and Related Damages IN NO EVENT WILL EITHER PARTY OR ITS AFFILIATES HAVE ANY LIABILITY ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT FOR ANY LOST PROFITS, REVENUES, GOODWILL, OR INDIRECT, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, COVER, BUSINESS INTERRUPTION OR PUNITIVE DAMAGES, WHETHER AN ACTION IS IN CONTRACT OR TORT AND REGARDLESS OF THE THEORY OF LIABILITY, EVEN IF A PARTY OR ITS AFFILIATES HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES OR IF A PARTY’S OR ITS AFFILIATES’ REMEDY OTHERWISE FAILS OF ITS ESSENTIAL PURPOSE. THE FOREGOING DISCLAIMER WILL NOT APPLY TO THE EXTENT PROHIBITED BY LAW.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.