Evaluation of consequences Sample Clauses

Evaluation of consequences for residential hydrogen fuel cells (mean per country and consequence) BE (M) FR (M) DE (M) NO (M) SL (M) ES (M) UK (M) Difference (eta)
Sample 1Sample 2
Evaluation of consequences. Participants were then provided with information regarding some of the potential consequences of the implementation of the specific FCH application. Each of the consequences was related to one potential benefit/cost of the application. This information was carefully designed and reviewed by experts in the consortium. Participants were then asked to rate each of the consequences in a scale from 1 to 5 (from very negative to very positive). The main objective of this exercise was to allow for an informed evaluation of the application by the participants. The exercise was based on the Information Choice Questionnaire (Best- waldhober & Xxxxxx, 2006b).
Sample 1Sample 2
Evaluation of consequences. Table 17 shows respondents’ evaluation of various consequences generally associated to hydro- gen vehicles. Seven consequences regarding the potential impacts of FCEVs were briefly intro- duced to study participants. Then, they were asked to evaluate, in a scale from 1 to 5, where 1 means very negative and 5 means very positive, each of the consequences. The data show that the three consequences evaluated in the total sample as the most positive are the fact that “they will reduce the need for petroleum” (86% of participants rated it as a posi- tive or very positive consequence, M= 4.31), it “would produce lower CO2 emissions than con- ventional cars” (86%, M= 4.30) and the “price of hydrogen” (79%, M= 4.06). The “range” and “safety issues” were, on average, as positive to not important consequences (M= 3.53 and 2.89 respectively). The “infrastructure needed” and “price of fuel cell material” were rated as some- how negative consequences (M= 2.53 and 2.24 respectively). In terms of agreement between participants, we find that the three consequences rated as more positive (reduction of the need for petroleum, lower CO2 emissions and price of hydrogen) gen- erate a greater degree of agreement (standard deviations between 0.80 and 0.94). Participants agree less on their evaluation of the two consequences rated as more negative; infrastructure needed and the price of fuel cell material (standard deviations between 1.32 and 1.28).
Sample 1Sample 2
Evaluation of consequences. Table 8 shows respondents’ evaluation of distinct consequences associated to residential FCHs. Six consequences regarding the potential impacts of installing residential FCHs were introduced to study participants by presenting them a short text for each consequence (see Figure 15). Then, respondents were asked to evaluate, in a scale from 1 to 5, where 1 means very negative and 5 means very positive, each of the consequences. The data show that the three consequences evaluated as the most positive are the fact that “it will reduce the cost of producing energy” (86% of participants rate it as a positive or very posi- tive consequence, M= 4.3), that it “would reduce CO2 emissions” (86%, M= 4.3) and that they would reduce the need to purchase electricity from the power company (85%, M= 4.2). The “house space requirements” and the “potential risks” are, on average, rated as not important- positive consequences (M= 3.8 and 3.2 respectively). The initial capital costs is rated as a nega- tive-neutral consequence (M= 2.6). In terms of agreement between participants, we find that the three consequences rated as more positive (reduction of the need to purchase electricity, CO2 emissions and lower cost of energy production) generate a greater degree of agreement (SD= 0.82 and SD=0.84). Participants agree less on their evaluation of the house space requirements and the risks of the installation (SD= 1.10). The initial capital costs is the consequence generating a lower degree of agreement be- tween participants (SD= 1.26) (Table 8). They would reduce the need to purchase electricity from a power company 1% 3% 11% 46% 39% 4.18 0.82 They would reduce CO2 emissions 1 2 11 39 47 4.29 0.82 Initial capital costs 25 27 19 22 7 2.59 1.26 It will reduce the cost of producing energy 1 3 10 38 49 4.30 0.84 Similar risks to other fuels 6 24 24 34 12 3.21 1.11 In terms of differences between countries in the evaluation of the consequences, we find signifi- cant but small differences, with the exception of the evaluation of the consequence “house space requirements” (eta= .272), which generates higher differences between the countries. Taking into account all the consequences evaluated, there is a more positive general evaluation of the consequences in Germany (M= 3.86) and Slovenia (3.89) and a more negative evaluation in Norway (3.61) and United Kingdom (3.63).
Sample 1
Evaluation of consequences. Table 8 shows respondents’ evaluation of distinct consequences associated to residential FCHs. Six consequences regarding the potential impacts of installing residential FCHs were introduced to study participants by presenting them a short text for each consequence (see Figure 15). Then, respondents were asked to evaluate, in a scale from 1 to 5, where 1 means very negative and 5 means very positive, each of the consequences. The data show that the three consequences evaluated as the most positive are the fact that “it will reduce the cost of producing energy” (86% of participants rate it as a positive or very posi- tive consequence, M= 4.3), that it “would reduce CO2 emissions” (86%, M= 4.3) and that they would reduce the need to purchase electricity from the power company (85%, M= 4.2). The “house space requirements” and the “potential risks” are, on average, rated as not important- positive consequences (M= 3.8 and 3.2 respectively). The initial capital costs is rated as a nega- tive-neutral consequence (M= 2.6). In terms of agreement between participants, we find that the three consequences rated as more positive (reduction of the need to purchase electricity, CO2 emissions and lower cost of energy production) generate a greater degree of agreement (SD= 0.82 and SD=0.84). Participants agree less on their evaluation of the house space requirements and the risks of the installation (SD= 1.10). The initial capital costs is the consequence generating a lower degree of agreement be- tween participants (SD= 1.26) (Table 8).
Sample 1

Related to Evaluation of consequences

  • Voluntariness and Consequences of Consent Denial or Withdrawal The Participant’s participation in the Plan and the Participant’s grant of consent is purely voluntary. The Participant may deny or withdraw his or her consent at any time. If the Participant does not consent, or if the Participant withdraws his or her consent, the Participant cannot participate in the Plan. This would not affect the Participant’s salary as an employee or his or her career; the Participant would merely forfeit the opportunities associated with the Plan.

  • Determination of Adverse Consequences The Parties shall take into account the time cost of money (using the Applicable Rate as the discount rate) in determining Adverse Consequences for purposes of this Section 8. All indemnification payments under this Section 8 shall be deemed adjustments to the Purchase Price.

  • Financial Consequences The Department reserves the right to impose financial consequences when the Contractor fails to comply with the requirements of the Contract. The following financial consequences will apply for the Contractor’s non-performance under the Contract. The Customer and the Contractor may agree to add additional Financial Consequences on an as-needed basis beyond those stated herein to apply to that Customer’s resultant contract or purchase order. The State of Florida reserves the right to withhold payment or implement other appropriate remedies, such as Contract termination or nonrenewal, when the Contractor has failed to comply with the provisions of the Contract. The Contractor and the Department agree that financial consequences for non-performance are an estimate of damages which are difficult to ascertain and are not penalties. The financial consequences below will be paid and received by the Department of Management Services within 30 calendar days from the due date specified by the Department. These financial consequences below are individually assessed for failures over each target period beginning with the first full month or quarter of the Contract performance and every month or quarter, respectively, thereafter. Deliverable Performance Metric Performance Due Date Financial Consequence for Non-Performance Contractor will timely submit completed Quarterly Sales Reports All Quarterly Sales Reports will be submitted timely with the required information Reports are due on or before the 30th calendar day after the close of each State fiscal quarter $250 per Calendar Day late/not received by the Contract Manager Contractor will timely submit completed MFMP Transaction Fee Reports All MFMP Transaction Fee Reports will be submitted timely with the required information Reports are due on or before the 15th calendar day after the close of each month $100 per Calendar Day late/not received by the Contract Manager

  • Exclusion of Consequential Loss ‌ Except as expressly provided otherwise in clause 31 or the IRMP Provisions which form part of this Agreement under clause 3, neither Party is liable to the other under or in connection with this Agreement (including under an indemnity) for any Consequential Loss however caused (including any breach of this Agreement or negligent act or omission of a Party).

  • Mitigation of Harmful Effects To mitigate, to the extent practicable, any harmful effect 8 that is known to CONTRACTOR of a use or disclosure of DHCS PI or PII by CONTRACTOR or its 9 subcontractors in violation of this Personal Information Privacy and Security Contract.

  • Limitation of Consequential Damages EXCEPT FOR (A) THIRD PARTY CLAIMS THAT ARE SUBJECT TO INDEMNIFICATION UNDER THIS ARTICLE 10, (B) CLAIMS ARISING OUT OF A PARTY’S WILLFUL MISCONDUCT OR FRAUD UNDER THIS AGREEMENT, (C) A PARTY’S BREACH OF ARTICLE 4, (D) NOVARTIS’ BREACH OF SECTION 6.5, OR (E) CLAIMS ARISING OUT OF A PARTY’S BREACH OF ITS CONFIDENTIALITY OBLIGATIONS UNDER THIS AGREEMENT, NEITHER PARTY NOR ANY OF ITS AFFILIATES WILL BE LIABLE TO THE OTHER PARTY TO THIS AGREEMENT OR ITS AFFILIATES FOR ANY INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, SPECIAL, PUNITIVE OR OTHER INDIRECT DAMAGES OR LOST OR IMPUTED PROFITS OR ROYALTIES, LOST DATA OR COST OF PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES, WHETHER LIABILITY IS ASSERTED IN CONTRACT, TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE AND STRICT PRODUCT LIABILITY), INDEMNITY OR CONTRIBUTION, AND IRRESPECTIVE OF WHETHER THAT PARTY OR ANY REPRESENTATIVE OF THAT PARTY HAS BEEN ADVISED OF, OR OTHERWISE MIGHT HAVE ANTICIPATED THE POSSIBILITY OF, ANY SUCH LOSS OR DAMAGE.

  • Effect of a Change in Control In the event of a Change in Control, Sections 6 through 13 of this Agreement shall become applicable to Executive. These Sections shall continue to remain applicable until the third anniversary of the date upon which the Change in Control occurs. On such third anniversary date, and provided that the employment of Executive has not been terminated on account of a Qualifying Termination (as defined in Section 5 below), this Agreement shall terminate and be of no further force or effect.

  • Effect of Consent (a) After an amendment, supplement or waiver becomes effective, it will bind every Holder unless it is of the type requiring the consent of each Holder affected. If the amendment, supplement or waiver is of the type requiring the consent of each Holder affected, the amendment, supplement or waiver will bind each Holder that has consented to it and every subsequent Holder of a Note that evidences the same debt as the Note of the consenting Holder. (b) If an amendment, supplement or waiver changes the terms of a Note, the Trustee may require the Holder to deliver it to the Trustee so that the Trustee may place an appropriate notation of the changed terms on the Note and return it to the Holder, or exchange it for a new Note that reflects the changed terms. The Trustee may also place an appropriate notation on any Note thereafter authenticated. However, the effectiveness of the amendment, supplement or waiver is not affected by any failure to annotate or exchange Notes in this fashion.

  • Exclusion of Consequential Damages ‌ Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary, neither Party will be liable under this Agreement or under any cause of action relating to the subject matter of this Agreement for any special, indirect, incidental, punitive, exemplary or consequential damages, including loss of profits, loss of use of any property or claims of customers or contractors of the Parties for any such damages.

  • Interpretation; Effect When a reference is made in this Agreement to Sections, Exhibits or Schedules, such reference shall be to a Section of, or Exhibit or Schedule to, this Agreement unless otherwise indicated. The table of contents and headings contained in this Agreement are for reference purposes only and are not part of this Agreement. Whenever the words “include”, “includes” or “including” are used in this Agreement, they shall be deemed to be followed by the words “without limitation.”