Table 8 definition

Table 8. Means of Recidivists and Non-Recidivists for Eight Risk/Need Factors and the Results of the Discriminant Function Analvsis Group Recidivists (n = 76)Non-Recidivists (n = 174)Correlations of predictor variables with * f i < . 01 . * * fi < .001 Note. Predictor variables (OFF - Prior and current offences/dispositions; FAM Family Circumstances/Parenting; EDUC - Education/Employment; PEER - Peer Relations; SUB - Substance Abuse; LEIS - Leisure/Recreation; PERS - Personality/Behaviour; ATT - Attitudes/Orientations).3 Values in brackets refer to the maximum score observed in the group. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.Critical Evaluation
Table 8. Analysis 2a: metric selection results. Metric - stressor correlation was consistent (yes) if the sign of the correlation was as expected. Xxxxxxxx rank correlation between the EQR, calculated using the formula EQR1, and the stressor is reported. A metric was redundant (redundancy=yes) if correlated (r>0.
Table 8. Frequency of Slut as Address by Relationship Survey responses for slut demonstrated similar patterns, though at an overall lower frequency. The reported use of address for slut by relationship demonstrated a slight pattern depending on how close the speaker considered their addressee. In Table 8, all of the

Examples of Table 8 in a sentence

  • The government has established mechanisms to coordinate its efforts to address child labor (Table 8).

  • The Contractor will provide the pricing of the upgraded product(s) to a maximum of 20% of each Category Contract Price of Table 8.

  • Targeted Therapies Market Worldwide (2010): Percentage Breakdown of Targeted Therapeutic Drugs under Various Stages of Development (includes corresponding Graph/Chart) Table 8.

  • The Government has other programs that may have an impact on child labor, including its worst forms (Table 8).

  • The third column in Table 8 lists the approval (A) or denial (D) status of each code.


More Definitions of Table 8

Table 8. Outlook for overall GDP growth (2004 prices) – Annual percentage changes 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Average 2013-16 Actual Estimate Projections Upper Estimate 4.8 4.2 4.4 4.4 4.5 4.4 4.4 Central Estimate 4.8 4.0 4.3 4.3 4.4 4.4 4.3 Lower Estimate 4.8 3.8 4.0 4.0 4.1 4.0 4.0
Table 8. Performance indicator for measuring sustainability of buildings (Umbria Region, 2013)
Table 8. The helper methods on the protocol state.
Table 8. Elected Women members in Kerala and Uttar Pradesh at all three levels of governance in 199931 (Unit: 100,000) Gram Panchayat Panchayati Samiti Zilla Parishad State Women Total % Women Total % Women Total % KE 3883 10270 37.81 563 1547 36.39 104 300 34.67 UP 174410 682670 25.55 14002 58165 24.07 648 2551 25.4 Source: India Panchayat Raj Report, 2001, Vol. I- National Institute of Rural Development
Table 8. Numerical Variable Ranges, Means, and Standard Deviations by
Table 8. Descriptive Statistics for Social Media Data Table 9: Descriptive Statistics for Advertising Data, Advertisement Characteristics, and Program Characteristics Advertising Data and Advertisement Characteristics Program Characteristics Table 10: Time Ad Instances Air Table 11: Model-free Evidence on the Relationship between Online Program Engagement and Online Shopping Activity
Table 8. HSCoE Metal Hydride Material Categories Tier 1 Developed Materials Tier 2 Developing Materials Down-selected Materials Metal Hydrides NaAlH 4 2LiNH 2 +MgH 2 Mg(NH 2 ) 2 +MgH 2 +2LiH TiCr(Mn)H 2 MgH 2 Mg 2 NiH 4 Material property data for the metal hydride materials of interest (particularly Tier 1 and Tier 2 materials) were collected from a variety of sources, which included MHCoE reports and investigator data, previous studies and the open literature. To perform preliminary engineering analyses several key material properties were identified as a high priority requirement. These key material properties included: