Common use of Evaluation of Full Status Full-Time Faculty Clause in Contracts

Evaluation of Full Status Full-Time Faculty. All full-status full-time faculty members shall be subject to formal evaluation once every four (4) years, utilizing the tools and procedures outlined in the Xxxxxxxxxxx College Faculty Evaluation Handbook. The evaluation process is to be non-punitive, promoting growth and opportunities for professional development. 1. One IDEA survey will be distributed to students in the semester prior to the checkpoint review meeting following the same process used in the evaluation process. 2. The Faculty will have sole possession of their detailed data, which includes the data cover sheets. The faculty member will provide a copy of their review process student data cover sheets to their immediate supervisor. 3. The IDEA results will not be tied to the evaluation score system. 4. The purpose of the checkpoint review meeting will be to have dialogue between the faculty member and the designated administrator regarding student data results, professional development activities and continuous improvement objectives. The faculty will bring with them, for the purpose of review and discussion, both the IDEA student data and their proposed professional development activities for the coming semesters. 5. In lieu of a face to face meeting, exceptional circumstances (i.e. faculty member is out of state, faculty member has other full time employment) may dictate the use of an alternative meeting format (i.e. phone or Internet meeting). 6. The administration will develop a standardized form to be utilized for recording professional development plans.

Evaluation of Full Status Full-Time Faculty. All full-status full-time faculty members shall be subject to formal evaluation once every four (4) years, utilizing the tools and procedures outlined in the Xxxxxxxxxxx College Faculty Evaluation Handbook. The evaluation process is to be non-punitive, promoting growth and opportunities for professional development. 1. One IDEA survey will be distributed to students in the semester prior to the checkpoint review meeting following the same process used in the evaluation process. 2. The Faculty will have sole possession of their detailed data, which includes the data cover sheets. The faculty member will provide a copy of their review process student data cover sheets to their immediate supervisor. 3. The IDEA results will not be tied to the evaluation score system. 4. The purpose of the checkpoint review meeting will be to have dialogue between the faculty member and the designated supervising administrator regarding student data results, professional development activities and continuous improvement objectives. The faculty will bring with them, for the purpose of review and discussion, both the IDEA student data and their proposed professional development activities for the coming semesters. 5. In lieu of a face to face meeting, exceptional circumstances (i.e. faculty member is out of state, faculty member has other full time employment) may dictate the use of an alternative meeting format (i.e. phone or Internet meeting). 6. The administration will develop a standardized form to be utilized for recording professional development plans.