Common use of Evaluation Response Options Clause in Contracts

Evaluation Response Options. The bargaining unit member may offer verbal comments upon the evaluation, record in writing on the evaluation form or on an appended document a statement of any elements in the evaluation with which he/she disagrees. If a bargaining unit member disagrees with the judgment of the evaluator, the bargaining unit member may (1) so note on the evaluation form; (2) so note, with comments in the “Bargaining Unit Member’s Acknowledgment” section of the form; and/or (3) forward to the Chief Human Resources Officer, a written statement expressing disagreement with the evaluation within forty (40) days following the employee’s signing of the evaluation form. Comments forwarded to the Chief Human Resources Officer under this provision will be appended to the evaluation form in the personnel file. A bargaining unit member who believes that the procedural requirements of this Article have not been met, or who believes that the information upon which an evaluation was based was improper (i.e., erroneous, incomplete, untimely, or irrelevant), may file a grievance under the provisions of Article 9 (“Grievance Procedure”). If the adjustment of the grievance includes a determination that the evaluation was procedurally flawed or based upon improper information, the University will nullify the evaluation and direct that it be redone.

Evaluation Response Options. The bargaining unit member may offer verbal comments upon the evaluation, record in writing on the evaluation form or on an appended document a statement of any elements in the evaluation with which he/she disagrees. If a bargaining unit member disagrees with the judgment of the evaluator, the bargaining unit member may (1) so note on the evaluation form; (2) so note, with comments in the “Bargaining Unit Member’s Acknowledgment” section of the form; and/or (3) forward to the Chief Human Resources Officer, a written statement expressing disagreement with the evaluation within forty (40) days following the employee’s 's signing of the evaluation form. Comments forwarded to the Chief Human Resources Officer under this provision will be appended to the evaluation form in the personnel file. A bargaining unit member who believes that the procedural requirements of this Article have not been met, or who believes that the information upon which an evaluation was based was improper (i.e., erroneous, incomplete, untimely, or irrelevant), may file a grievance under the provisions of Article 9 (“Grievance Procedure”). If the adjustment of the grievance includes a determination that the evaluation was procedurally flawed or based upon improper informationUpon the death of a retired bargaining unit member, his/her un-remarried spouse and dependent children to the University will nullify end of the evaluation academic year of age twenty-five (25) shall remain entitled to the benefits specified in Article 27, Sections 27.3 and direct that it be redone.27.4

Evaluation Response Options. The bargaining unit member may offer verbal comments upon the evaluation, record in writing on the evaluation form or on an appended document a statement of any elements in the evaluation with which he/she disagrees. If a bargaining unit member disagrees with the judgment of the evaluator, the bargaining unit member may (1) so note on the evaluation form; (2) so note, with comments in the “Bargaining Unit Member’s Acknowledgment” section of the form; and/or (3) forward to the Chief Human Resources Officer, a written statement expressing disagreement with the evaluation within forty (40) days following the employee’s 's signing of the evaluation form. Comments forwarded to the Chief Human Resources Officer under this provision will be appended to the evaluation form in the personnel file. A bargaining unit member who believes that the procedural requirements of this Article have not been met, or who believes that the information upon which an evaluation was based was improper (i.e., erroneous, incomplete, untimely, or irrelevant), may file a grievance under the provisions of Article 9 (“Grievance Procedure”). If the adjustment of the grievance includes a determination that the evaluation was procedurally flawed or based upon improper information, the University will nullify the evaluation and direct that it be redone.