Determination of Responsiveness Sample Clauses

Determination of Responsiveness. 28.1 The Procuring Entity's determination of a Tender's responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the Tender itself, as defined in ITT28.2.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Determination of Responsiveness. 31.1 The Procuring Entity's determination of a Tender's responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the Tender itself, as defined in ITT 12. 31.2 A substantially responsive Tender is one that meets the requirements of the tendering document without material deviation, reservation, or omission. A material deviation, reservation, or omission is one that: a) If accepted, would: i. affect in any substantial way the scope, quality, or performance of the Non-Consulting Services specified in the Contract; or ii. limit in any substantial way, inconsistent with the tendering document, the Procuring Entity's rights or the Tenderer's obligations under the Contract; or b) if rectified, would unfairly affect the competitive position of other Tenderers presenting substantially responsive Tenders. 31.3 The Procuring Entity shall examine the technical aspects of the Tender submitted in accordance with ITT 18and ITT 19, in particular, to confirm that all requirements of Section VII, Procuring Entity's Requirements have been met without any material deviation or reservation, or omission. 31.4 If a Tender is not substantially responsive to the requirements of tendering document, it shall be rejected by the Procuring Entity and may not subsequently be made responsive by correction of the material deviation, reservation, or omission. 31.5 Provided that a Tender is substantially responsive, the Procuring Entity may waive any non-conformity in the Tender. 31.6 Provided that a Tender is substantially responsive, the Procuring Entity may request that the Tenderer submit the necessary information or documentation, within a reasonable period of time, to rectify nonmaterial non- conformities or omissions in the Tender related to documentation requirements. Requesting information or documentation on such non-conformities shall not be related to any aspect of the price of the Tender. Failure of the Tenderer to comply with the request may result in the rejection of its Tender. 31.7 Provided that a Tender is substantially responsive, the Procuring Entity shall rectify quantifiable nonmaterial non-conformities related to the Tender Price. To this effect, the Tender Price shall be adjusted, for comparison purposes only, to reflect the price of a missing or non-conforming item or component in the manner specified in the TDS.
Determination of Responsiveness a. The bid evaluation committee shall determine the responsiveness of a Bid on the basis of bidding document and the provisions of pre-qualification/ eligibility criteria of the bidding document. b. A responsive Bid is one that meets the requirements of the bidding document without any material deviation, reservation, or omission where: -
Determination of Responsiveness. Determination of responsiveness will take place at the time of bid opening and evaluation. In order to be deemed a responsive bidder, the bid must conform in all material respects to the requirements stated in the Contract. As set forth in section 2.27, FSA reserves the right to waive or allow a vendor to correct minor irregularities.
Determination of Responsiveness. 28.1 The Procuring Entity's determination of a Tender's responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the Tender itself, as defined in ITT28.2. 28.2 A substantially responsive Tender is one that meets the requirements of the tendering document without material deviation, reservation, or omission. A material deviation, reservation, or omission is one that: a) if accepted, would: i) affect in any substantial way the scope, quality, or performance of the Goods and Related Services specified in the Contract; or ii) limit in any substantial way, inconsistent with the tendering document, the Procuring Entity's rights or the Tenderer obligations under the Contract; or b) if rectified, would unfairly affect the competitive position of other Tenderers presenting substantially responsive Tenders. 28.3 The Procuring Entity shall examine the technical aspects of the Tender submitted in accordance with ITT 15 and ITT 16, in particular, to confirm that all requirements of Section VII, Schedule of Requirements have been met without any material deviation or reservation, or omission. 28.4 If a Tender is not substantially responsive to the requirements of tendering document, it shall be rejected by the Procuring Entity and may not subsequently be made responsive by correction of the material deviation, reservation, or omission.
Determination of Responsiveness. 31.1 The Procuring Entity's determination of a Tender's responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the Tender itself, as defined in ITT 12. 31.2 A substantially responsive Tender is one that meets the requirements of the tendering document without material deviation, reservation, or omission. A material deviation, reservation, or omission is one that: a) If accepted, would: i. affect in any substantial way the scope, quality, or performance of the Non- Consulting Services specified in the Contract; or
Determination of Responsiveness. 31.1 The Procuring Entity's determination of a Tender's responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the Tender itself, as defined in ITT 12. 31.2 A substantially responsive Tender is one that meets the requirements of the tendering document without material deviation, reservation, or omission. A material deviation, reservation, or omission is one that: a) If accepted, would: i) Affect in any substantial way the scope, quality, or performance of the Maintenance services specified in the Contract; or ii) Limit in any substantial way, inconsistent with the tendering document, the Procuring Entity's rights or the Tenderer's obligations under the Contract; or b) if rectified, would unfairly affect the competitive position of other Tenderers presenting substantially responsive Tenders.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Determination of Responsiveness. ‌ 31.1 The Procuring Entity's determination of a Tender's responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the tender itself, as defined in ITT 13. 31.2 A substantially responsive Tender is one that meets the requirements of the Tender document without material deviation, reservation, or omission. A material deviation, reservation, or omission is one that, if accepted, would: a) affect in any substantial way the scope, quality, or performance of the Works specified in the Contract; or b) limit in any substantial way, inconsistent with the tender document, the Procuring Entity's rights or the tenderer's obligations under the proposed contract; or c) if rectified, would unfairly affect the competitive position of other tenderers presenting substantially responsive tenders. 31.3 The Procuring Entity shall examine the technical aspects of the tender submitted in accordance with ITT 18, to confirm that all requirements of Section VII, Works' Requirements have been met without any material deviation, reservation or omission. 31.4 If a tender is not substantially responsive to the requirements of the tender document, it shall be rejected by the Procuring Entity and may not subsequently be made responsive by correction of the material deviation, reservation, or omission.
Determination of Responsiveness. 31.1 The Procuring Entity's determination of a Tender's responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the Tender itself, as defined in ITT 11. 31.2 A substantially responsive Tender is one that meets the requirements of the tendering document without material deviation, reservation, or omission. A material deviation, reservation, or omission is one that; a) If accepted, would: i) Affect in any substantial way the scope, quality, or performance of the Information System specified in the Contract; or ii) Limit in any substantial way, in consistent with the tendering document, the Procuring Entity's rights or the Tenderer's obligations under the proposed Contract; or b) If rectified, would unfairly affect the competitive position of other Tenderers presenting substantially responsive Tenders. 31.3 The Procuring Entity shall examine the technical aspects of the Tender in particular, to confirm that all requirements of Section V, Procuring Entity's Requirements have been met without any material deviation, reservation, or omission. 31.4 To be considered for Contract award, Tenderers must have submitted Tenders: a) for which detailed Tender evaluation using the same standards for compliance determination as listed in ITT 29 and ITT 30.3 confirms that the Tenders are commercially and technically responsive, and include the hardware, Software, related equipment, products, Materials, and other Goods and Services components of the Information System in substantially the full required quantities for the entire Information System or, if allowed in the TDS ITT 35.8, the individual Subsystem, lot or slice Tender on; and are deemed by the Procuring Entity as commercially and technically responsive; and b) That offer Information Technologies that are proven to perform up to the standards promised in the tender by having successfully passed the performance, benchmark, and/or functionality tests the Procuring Entity may require, pursuant to ITT 39.3.
Determination of Responsiveness i) Prior to the financial evaluation of bids, the GAIL will determine whether each bid is substantially responsible to the requirements of the Bidding document. ii) For the purpose of this clause, a substantially responsible bid is one, which conforms to all the terms and conditions and specifications of the bidding document without material deviation or reservation. A material deviation or reservation is one which affects in any substantial way the scope, quality, or performance of the works or which limits in any substantial way, in consistent with the bidding document, the employer’s rights of contractor’s obligation would affect unfairly the competitive position of bidders presenting substantially responsive bids. iii) If a bid is not substantially responsive to the requirements of the Bidding documents, it may be rejected by the GAIL.
Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!