Exonerated. The alleged conduct occurred, but it was lawful and the officer's actions were within accepted Department Policies and Procedures. The investigating officer may stipulate that an “exonerated” finding revealed policy or training issues and recommend further review in these areas.
Exonerated. The incident in which the complainant reported did occur, however, the Officer's actions were lawful or proper under the circumstance.
Exonerated. The acts which provided the basis for the complaint or allegation occurred; however, investigation revealed that they were justified, lawful, and proper.
Exonerated. All discipline shall be vacated and the officer returned to status and benefits as was before the discipline was imposed.
Exonerated. 3. Non-Sustained - the evidence is insufficient to prove or disprove an allegation.
Exonerated. The acts that provided the basis for the complaint or allegations did occur. However, the investigation revealed that they were justified, lawful and proper.
Exonerated. A finding or conclusion that the incident occurred but the Deputy’s actions were lawful and proper.
Exonerated. Acts did occur, but actions were justified, lawful and proper.
Exonerated. The investigation disclosed sufficient evidence to determine that the alleged conduct did occur, but was in accord with law and with all Oakland Police Department rules, regulations, or policies. d.
Exonerated. The incident occurred but was lawful and proper.
