Extension-Agreement Phase Sample Clauses

Extension-Agreement Phase. The goal of the “extension-agreement phase” is to allow return processor to compute an agreement value which is the same as other fault-free mobile processors’ agreement value. In the “extension-agreement phase”, each return processor receives the agreement values from other mobile processors which join whole the “message-exchange phase”. The VOTE function is used on the values received to obtain the agreement value. The return processor can then obtain the same agreement value as other fault-free mobile processors. The reason is that each fault-free mobile processor can reach an agreement value if z>⎣(z-1)/3⎦+2Zm+Za. Hence, there are at least z-⎣(z-1-Za)/3⎦-Za zones that are fault-free and have the same agreement value. That is, in the worst case, a return processor can receive z-⎣(z-1-Za)/3⎦-Za copies of the same value, which is large then ⎣(z-1-Za)/3⎦. Therefore, a return processor can then decide the agreement value bye using the function VOTE.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Extension-Agreement Phase. The goal of the extension-agreement phase is to allow return nodes to compute a common agreement value the same as that of other fault-free nodes’ function VOTEad(s) value. In the extension-agreement phase, each return node receives the agreement values from the other nodes. The VOTEad function is used on the values received to obtain the agreement value. The return nodes can then obtain the same agreement value as other fault-free nodes. The reason is that each fault-free node can reach a common agreement value if n>3fm+fa. Thus, there are at least n-⎣(n-1-fa)/3⎦-fa nodes that are fault-free and have the same agreement value. That is, in the worst case, a return node can receive n-⎣(n-1-fa)/3⎦-fa copies of the same value, which is larger than ⎣(n-1-fa)/3⎦. A return node can then decide which agreement value using the VOTEad function. The MAHAP protocol definition is shown in Figure 2, and the flow chart of the MAHAP is shown in Appendix I. MOBILE AD-HOC AGREEMENT PROTOCOL (MAHAP) Definition: ◆ For the “Table-driven” Ad-Hoc routing protocols, each node has common knowledge of the entire graphic information G=(E,N), where N is the set of nodes in the network and E is a set of node pairs (Ni,Nj) indicating a physical link (the radio range is covered) between node Ni and node Nj ,where 1 ≤ i,j ≤ n. ◆ For the “On-demand” Ad-Hoc routing protocols, each node has partial common knowledge of the graphic information G=(E,N). ◆ Each node can transmit a message to all other nodes in the MANET through the “On-demand“ or the “Table-driven” or the “Hybrid” protocol. ◆ Three node roles: sender node, relay node and receiver node, depending on the message flow. A message sent from a sender node to a receiver node may be passed through some intermediate (relay node). ◆ A relay node cannot falsify a message from a sender node to a receiver node. This is achieved using authentication technology. ◆ The return node, a node that moves away from the MANET in the message-exchange phase, and returns to the MANET before the decision-making phase. ◆ Each node receives other nodes’ messages at each message exchange round. If no message is received, the value is replaced with δ0. Message-Exchange Phase: Compute the number of rounds required γ: γ=t+1, where t= ⎣(n-1)/3⎦. For i = 1 to γ If i=1, then:
Extension-Agreement Phase. The goal of the extension-agreement phase is to allow return nodes reach a common agreement value VOTE(s) with other fault-free nodes. In the extension-agreement phase, each return node receives the agreement values of the other fault-free nodes. The VOTE function is used on the values received to obtain the agreement value. The return nodes can then obtain the same agreement value as the other fault-free nodes. The reason is that each fault-free node can reach a common agreement value if n>3fm+fa. Hence, there are at least n-(n-1-fa)/3-fa nodes that are fault-free and have the same agreement value. That is, in the worst case, a return node can receive n-(n-1-fa)/3-fa copies of the same value, which is larger than (n-1-fa)/3. A return node can then decide which agreement value to be used in the VOTE function.
Extension-Agreement Phase. For the return processor only Step 1: Receive other mobile processors ' VOTE(s) values.
Extension-Agreement Phase. (for the return node only) Step 1: Each return node requests other nodes to send their VOTEad(s) values. Step 2: Each return node receives other nodes’ VOTEad(s) values.

Related to Extension-Agreement Phase

  • Interim Extension Amendment a. Prior to or on the expiration date of this Contract, the Parties agree that this Contract can be extended as provided under this Section.

  • Extension No 1. Trade name or xxxx of vehicle: .........................................................................

  • AGREEMENT RENEWAL This Agreement shall not bind nor purport to bind the AZDOHS for any contractual commitment in excess of the original Agreement period.

  • Extension; Waiver At any time prior to the Effective Time any party hereto may, to the extent legally allowed, (i) extend the time for the performance of any of the obligations or other acts of the other parties hereto, (ii) waive any inaccuracies in the representations and warranties made to such party contained herein or in any document delivered pursuant hereto and (iii) waive compliance with any of the agreements or conditions for the benefit of such party contained herein. Any agreement on the part of a party hereto to any such extension or waiver shall be valid only if set forth in an instrument in writing signed on behalf of such party.

  • AGREEMENT REOPENER This Agreement may be amended by mutual consent. ARTICLE

  • Extension of Agreement Prior to the original expiration date of this Agreement, the Parties mutually agree to extend this Agreement to the February 15 extension date identified in Paragraph VIII(A). The Parties acknowledge that no further extensions of this Agreement are authorized. Xxxxxxxxx has hereunto signed on this Day of , 20 . Landowner(s): The Secretary of the Department of Agriculture, acting and through his or her authorized representative has executed this Contract on behalf of the United States of America on this Day of , 20 . THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BY: NONDISCRIMINATION STATEMENT The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at 0 (000) 000-0000 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 0000 Xxxxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxx, XX., Xxxxxxxxxx, XX 00000-0000 or call (000) 000-0000 (voice) or (000) 000-0000 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT

  • Development Agreement As soon as reasonably practicable following the ISO’s selection of a transmission Generator Deactivation Solution, the ISO shall tender to the Developer that proposed the selected transmission Generator Deactivation Solution a draft Development Agreement, with draft appendices completed by the ISO to the extent practicable, for review and completion by the Developer. The draft Development Agreement shall be in the form of the ISO’s Commission-approved Development Agreement for its reliability planning process, which is in Appendix C in Section 31.7 of Attachment Y of the ISO OATT, as amended by the ISO to reflect the Generator Deactivation Process. The ISO and the Developer shall finalize the Development Agreement and appendices as soon as reasonably practicable after the ISO’s tendering of the draft Development Agreement. For purposes of finalizing the Development Agreement, the ISO and Developer shall develop the description and dates for the milestones necessary to develop and construct the selected project by the required in-service date identified in the Generator Deactivation Assessment, including the milestones for obtaining all necessary authorizations. Any milestone that requires action by a Connecting Transmission Owner or Affected System Operator identified pursuant to Attachment P of the ISO OATT to complete must be included as an Advisory Milestone, as that term is defined in the Development Agreement. If the ISO or the Developer determines that negotiations are at an impasse, the ISO may file the Development Agreement in unexecuted form with the Commission on its own, or following the Developer’s request in writing that the agreement be filed unexecuted. If the Development Agreement is executed by both parties, the ISO shall file the agreement with the Commission for its acceptance within ten (10) Business Days after the execution of the Development Agreement by both parties. If the Developer requests that the Development Agreement be filed unexecuted, the ISO shall file the agreement at the Commission within ten (10) Business Days of receipt of the request from the Developer. The ISO will draft, to the extent practicable, the portions of the Development Agreement and appendices that are in dispute and will provide an explanation to the Commission of any matters as to which the parties disagree. The Developer will provide in a separate filing any comments that it has on the unexecuted agreement, including any alternative positions it may have with respect to the disputed provisions. Upon the ISO’s and the Developer’s execution of the Development Agreement or the ISO’s filing of an unexecuted Development Agreement with the Commission, the ISO and the Developer shall perform their respective obligations in accordance with the terms of the Development Agreement that are not in dispute, subject to modification by the Commission. The Connecting Transmission Owner(s) and Affected System Operator(s) that are identified in Attachment P of the ISO OATT in connection with the selected transmission Generator Deactivation Solution shall act in good faith in timely performing their obligations that are required for the Developer to satisfy its obligations under the Development Agreement.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!