Favorable Ruling Sample Clauses

A Favorable Ruling clause defines the conditions under which a party benefits from a positive decision by a court or tax authority regarding a specific issue addressed in the contract. Typically, this clause outlines what constitutes a favorable ruling, such as a judgment or administrative decision that supports a party’s position, and may specify the process for acting upon such a ruling, like adjusting payments or obligations accordingly. Its core practical function is to allocate risk and provide certainty by clarifying the consequences and next steps if a favorable legal or regulatory outcome is obtained.
Favorable Ruling. The Foundation shall have received a copy of the Favorable Ruling obtained pursuant to Section 4.02(f) hereof, and the Favorable Ruling shall not have been revoked, withdrawn, amended or modified (in whole or in part) and there shall have been no change in applicable law (including, without limitation, the Code, judicial decisions, administrative regulations and published rulings) with regard to matters covered by the Favorable Ruling; provided, however, that in the event that the Internal Revenue Service shall fail to include in the Favorable Ruling any or all Favorable Ruling Matters for any reason (including but not limited to no request for a private letter ruling is made or, if made, the request is withdrawn in whole or in part, or the Internal Revenue Service refuses to rule with respect to any Favorable Ruling Matter), the Favorable Ruling Matter(s) not so included shall nonetheless be deemed to be included in the Favorable Ruling for purposes of satisfying this condition provided that the Foundation shall have received the opinions provided in Section 4.05(g) hereof on such excluded Favorable Ruling Matter(s) in form and substance reasonably acceptable to the Foundation; and
Favorable Ruling. BCBSMo (or the appropriate party) shall have received a private letter ruling (the "Favorable Ruling") from the Internal Revenue Service that (i) gain or loss will not be recognized by BCBSMo, RIT, HALIC, New RIT, the Foundation or the public shareholders of both RIT and New RIT for federal income tax purposes pursuant to the Transfer and Assumption Transaction; (ii) the Charter Conversion Transaction will constitute a reorganization under Section 368(a) of the Code and will not result in the recognition of gain or loss by BCBSMo, New BCBSMo or the Foundation for federal income tax purposes, (iii) the Reincorporation Merger Transaction will qualify as a reorganization under Section 368(a)(1)(F) of the Code and no gain or loss will be recognized by New BCBSMo or New RIT for federal income tax purposes, (iv) the RIT/New RIT Merger Transaction will be both a liquidation under Sections 332 and 337 of the Code and a reorganization under Section 368(a)(1)(A) of the Code and no gain or loss will be recognized by RIT, New RIT, the shareholders of both RIT and New RIT, or the Foundation for federal income tax purposes, and (v) no gain will be recognized by BCBSMo, New BCBSMo, RIT, New RIT, the shareholders of any of the foregoing entities, or the Foundation under Section 337(b)(2) or (d) of the Code ((i)-(v), each a "Favorable Ruling Matter"), and the Favorable Ruling shall not have been revoked, withdrawn, amended or modified (in whole or in part) and there shall have been no change in applicable law (including, without limitation, the Code, judicial decisions, administrative regulations and published rulings) with regard to matters covered by the Favorable Ruling; provided, however, that in the event that the Internal Revenue Service shall fail to include in the Favorable Ruling any or all Favorable Ruling Matters for any reason (including but not limited to no request for a private letter ruling is made or, if made, the request is withdrawn in whole or in part, or the Internal Revenue Service refuses to rule with respect to any Favorable Ruling Matter), the Favorable Ruling Matter(s) not so included shall nonetheless be deemed to be included in a Favorable Ruling for purposes of satisfying this condition provided that BCBSMo shall have received the opinions provided in Section 4.02(g) hereof on such excluded Favorable Ruling Matter(s) in form and substance reasonably acceptable to BCBSMo;
Favorable Ruling. The Foundation shall have received a copy of the Favorable Ruling obtained by BCBSMo, and the Favorable Ruling shall not have been revoked, withdrawn, amended or modified (in whole or in part) and there shall have been no change in applicable law (including, without limitation, the Code, judicial decisions, administrative regulations and published rulings) with regard to matters covered by the Favorable Ruling; provided, however, that in the event that the Internal Revenue Service shall fail to include in the Favorable Ruling any or all Favorable Ruling Matters other than as described in subparagraph (ii) of Section 4.02(f) hereof because such excluded Favorable Ruling Matter is a no ruling area or for any other reason, the Favorable Ruling Matter(s) not so included shall nonetheless be deemed to be included in the Favorable Ruling for purposes of satisfying this condition provided that the Foundation shall have received the opinions provided in Section 4.05(g) hereof on such excluded Favorable Ruling Matter(s) in form and substance reasonably acceptable to the Foundation; and
Favorable Ruling. If a Favorable Ruling is received, then Central City shall be obligated to pay to ▇▇▇▇▇ (a) all Accrued Earned Royalty Fees, such fees to be paid within ten (10) days of the date of the Favorable Ruling; and (b) all Earned Royalty Fees based on the production of Qualified Fuels after the IRS Ruling, such fees to be made in arrears within fifteen (15) days following the end of each such calendar quarter, based on production during such previous calendar quarter, until this Agreement is terminated pursuant to Article 6.
Favorable Ruling. If the IRS Ruling received by Central City is favorable (a "Favorable Ruling"), as determined by Central City in its sole discretion, then, within thirty (30) days after the end of the IRS Ruling Month: (1) if the end of the IRS Ruling Month is subsequent to the Maximum Tonnage Date, Central City shall pay to ▇▇▇▇▇ the sum of $**** (which is the product of $**** per ton of Qualified Fuels multiplied by 650,000 tons of Qualified Fuels); or (2) if the end of the IRS Ruling Month is prior to the Maximum Tonnage Date, Central City shall pay ▇▇▇▇▇ a sum equal to the product of (A) $**** per ton of Qualified Fuels, multiplied by (B) the tons of Qualified Fuels actually produced at the Facility from 12:00 a.m. on December 14, 1999 through 11:59 p.m. of the last day of the IRS Ruling Month.
Favorable Ruling. 27 (g) Tax Opinions.......................................28 (h)

Related to Favorable Ruling

  • Advance Rulings 1. Each Party, through its customs administration or other relevant authorities, to the extent permitted by its domestic laws, regulations and administrative determinations, on the application of a person described in Paragraph 2(a), shall provide in writing advance rulings in respect of the tariff classification, questions arising from the application of the principles of the Agreement on Customs Valuation and/or origin of goods. 2. Where available, each Party shall adopt or maintain procedures for advance rulings, which shall: (a) provide that an importer in its territory or an exporter or producer in the territory of another Party may apply for an advance ruling before the importation of the goods in question; (b) require that an applicant for an advance ruling provide a detailed description of the goods and all relevant information needed to process an application for an advance ruling; (c) provide that its customs administration may, at any time during the course of an evaluation of an application for an advance ruling, request that the applicant provide additional information within a specified period; (d) provide that any advance ruling be based on the facts and circumstances presented by the applicant, and any other relevant information in the possession of the decision-maker; and (e) provide that an advance ruling be issued to the applicant expeditiously, within the period specified in each Party's domestic laws, regulations or administrative determinations. 3. A Party may reject requests for an advance ruling where the additional information requested by it in accordance with Paragraph 2(c) is not provided within the specified period. 4. Subject to Paragraphs 1 and 5 and where available, each Party shall apply an advance ruling to all importations of goods described in that ruling imported into its territory for three years from the date of that ruling, or such other period as specified in that Party's domestic laws, regulations or administrative determinations. 5. A Party may modify or revoke an advance ruling upon a determination that the ruling was based on an error of fact or law (including human error), the information provided is false or inaccurate, if there is a change in domestic law consistent with this Agreement, or there is a change in a material fact or circumstance on which the ruling is based. 6. Where an importer claims that the treatment accorded to an imported good should be governed by an advance ruling, the customs administration may evaluate whether the facts and circumstances of the importation are consistent with the facts and circumstances upon which an advance ruling was based.

  • Tax Ruling The Assuming Institution shall not at any time, without the Receiver’s prior written consent, seek a private letter ruling or other determination from the Internal Revenue Service or otherwise seek to qualify for any special tax treatment or benefits associated with any payments made by the Receiver pursuant to this Single Family Shared-Loss Agreement.

  • Tax Rulings Neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries has requested or is the subject of or bound by any private letter ruling, technical advice memorandum, or similar ruling or memorandum with any taxing authority with respect to any material Taxes, nor is any such request outstanding.

  • Group Tax Exemption Ruling As of the Disaffiliation Date, Local Church shall cease to use, and also shall ensure that any Subsidiaries or affiliates of Local Church which have been included in the group tax exemption ruling shall cease to use, any and all documentation stating that Local Church is included in the denomination’s group tax exemption ruling administered by the General Council on Finance and Administration of The United Methodist Church. Local Church and any of its Subsidiaries and affiliates which have been included in the group tax exemption ruling will be removed as of the Disaffiliation Date.

  • Section 368 Opinion The Company shall have received a written opinion of G▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Traurig, LLP (or other counsel to the Company reasonably satisfactory to Parent), dated as of the Closing Date and in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the Company, to the effect that, on the basis of the facts, representations and assumptions set forth or referred to in such opinion, the Merger will qualify as a “reorganization” within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code. In rendering the opinion described in this Section 7.3(e), counsel shall be entitled to require and rely upon customary representations contained in certificates of officers of the Company and Parent, reasonably satisfactory in form and substance to the Company and Parent.