Common use of FIGURES Clause in Contracts

FIGURES. Figure 1: Number of Children in DHS Custody at the End of SFY - 2004 to 2018 16 Figure 2: Children in Custody on June 30, 2018 by Age Group 17 Figure 3: Children in Custody on June 30, 2018 by Length of Stay 18 Figure 4 : Children in Custody on June 30, 2018 by Placement Type 19 Figure 5: New Xxxxxx Care Homes Developed by Month, July 2017-June 2018 20 Figure 6: New Xxxxxx Homes by Type, July 2017-June 2018 21 Figure 7: New Therapeutic Xxxxxx Homes by Month, July 2017-June 2018 33 Figure 8: Worker Caseloads: Percent of Workers Meeting Caseload Standards 43 Figure 9: Supervisor Workloads: Percent of Supervisors Meeting Workload Standards 48 Figure 10: Metrics 5.1 – Shelter-Nights, Children Ages 0 - 1 51 Figure 11: Metric 5.2 – Shelter-Nights, Children Ages 2 – 5 52 Figure 12: Metric 5.3 – Shelter-Nights, Children Ages 6 – 12 53 Figure 13: Metric 5.4 – Shelter-Nights, Children Ages 13 and Old 54 Figure 14: Number of Children Six Years and Older with a Shelter Stay Jan 2015 to June 2018 55 Figure 15: Metric 1a – Absence of Maltreatment in Care by Resource Caregivers 64 Figure 16: Metric 1b – Absence of Maltreatment in Care by Parents 66 Figure 17: Metric 3.1 – Frequency of Visits by All Workers 81 Figure 18: Metric 3.2 – Frequency of Primary Worker Visits 82 Figure 19: Metric 3.3b – Continuity of Primary Worker Visits Over Six Months 83 Figure 20: Metric 6.2a – Permanency within 12 Months of Removal 94 Figure 21: Reduction in Short-Term Removals 95 Figure 22: Metric 6.2b – Permanency within 2 years of Removal 100 Figure 23: Metric 6.2c – Permanency within 3 years of Removal 102 Figure 24: Metric 6.2d – Permanency within 4 years of Removal 104 Figure 25: Metric 6.3 – Re-entry within 12 Months of Exit 105 Figure 26: Metric 6.5 – Permanency Performance 106 Figure 27: Metric 6.6 – Permanency Performance 108 Figure 28: Metric 6.7 – Permanency Performance 110 Figure 29: Metric 6.4 – Permanency Performance 113 Tables Table 1: Summary of Target Outcomes 8 Table 2: Traditional Home Closure Reasons, July 2017-June 2018 26 Table 3: Home Closure Reason Responses to Exit Survey Question #1? 28 Table 4: Pinnacle Plan Caseload and Workload Standard Commitments 41 Table 5: Caseload Compliance by Worker Type – June 30, 2018 44 Table 6: Caseload Compliance of Eight Struggling Districts 46 Table 7: Number of workers with a Caseload over 200%, 2014 to 2018 47 Table 8: Child-Nights in Shelters by Age, January 2018 to June 2018 54 Table 9: Pinnacle Plan 1.17: June 2017 to June 2018 56 Table 10: Youth with More than One Shelter Stay during Period 56 Table 11: Total Children who Experienced a Shelter Stay, January to June 2018 61 Table 12: Rate of MIC by Placement Type, Current and Prior Report Periods 67 Table 13: Placement Stability Baselines, Targets, and Current Performance 85 Table 14: Percent of Children Whose First Countable Placement is a Kinship Home 87 Table 15: First Placement of Children Removed between January and June 2018 92 Table 16: Top Three Exit Reasons for First Placement Moves 92 Table 17: Measure 6.2b, Permanency Rates by Report Period 101 Table 18: Measure 6.2c, Permanency Rates by Report Period 103 Table 19: Number of Children who became Legally Free under Metric 6.5 107 Table 20: Metric 6.1 – Permanency Performance 111 Appendices Appendix A: Metric Plan Baselines and Targets (Updated September 2015) 115 Appendix B: Xxxxxx Care Survey Results 124 Appendix C: Xxxxxx Home Closure Reason Instruction 131 Appendix D: TFC Treatment Team Guide 132 Appendix E: Shelter Authorization Form 134 Appendix F: Progressive Shelter Staffing Guide 138 Appendix G: MIC Expanded Core Strategies 141 Appendix H: MIC Heightened Placement Protocols in Group Homes 145 Glossary Glossary 1: Acronyms 147

Appears in 2 contracts

Samples: Settlement Agreement, Settlement Agreement

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

FIGURES. Figure 1: Number of Children in DHS Custody at the End of SFY - 2004 to 2018 16 2019 15 Figure 2: Children in Custody on June 30December 31, 2018 by Age Group 17 (Total = 7,995) 16 Figure 3: Children in Custody on June 30December 31, 2018 by Length of Stay 18 (Total = 7,995) 17 Figure 4 : Children in Custody on June 30December 31, 2018 by Placement Type 19 18 Figure 5: New Xxxxxx Care Homes Developed by Month, July 2017-June - December 2018 20 19 Figure 6: New Xxxxxx Homes by Type, July 2017-June – December 2018 21 (N=360) 20 Figure 7: New Therapeutic Xxxxxx Homes by Month, July 20172018-June December 2018 33 29 Figure 8: Worker Caseloads: Percent of Workers Meeting Caseload Standards 43 40 Figure 9: Supervisor Workloads: Percent of Supervisors Meeting Workload Standards 48 45 Figure 10: Metrics 5.1 – Shelter-Nights, Children Ages 0 - 1 51 47 Figure 11: Metric 5.2 – Shelter-Nights, Children Ages 2 – 5 52 48 Figure 12: Metric 5.3 – Shelter-Nights, Children Ages 6 – 12 53 49 Figure 13: Metric 5.4 – Shelter-Nights, Children Ages 13 and Old 54 Older 50 Figure 14: Number of Children Six Years and Older with a Shelter Stay Jan 2015 to June 2018 55 Figure 15: Metric 1a – Absence of Maltreatment in Care by Resource Caregivers 64 58 Figure 1615: Metric 1b – Absence of Maltreatment in Care by Parents 66 60 Figure 16: Rate of MIC by Placement Type, Current and Prior Report Periods 61 Figure 17: Metric 3.1 – Frequency of Visits by All Workers 81 73 Figure 18: Metric 3.2 – Frequency of Primary Worker Visits 82 74 Figure 19: Metric 3.3b – Continuity of Primary Worker Visits Over Six Months 83 75 Figure 20: Metric 6.2a – Permanency within 12 Months of Removal 94 86 Figure 21: Reduction in Short-Term Removals 95 Figure 22: Metric 6.2b – Permanency within 2 years of Removal 100 90 Figure 2322: Metric 6.2c – Permanency within 3 years of Removal 102 92 Figure 2423: Metric 6.2d – Permanency within 4 years of Removal 104 94 Figure 2524: Metric 6.3 – Re-entry within 12 Months of Exit 105 95 Figure 2625: Metric 6.5 – Permanency Performance 106 96 Figure 2726: Metric 6.6 – Permanency Performance 108 98 Figure 2827: Metric 6.7 – Permanency Performance 110 101 Figure 2928: Metric 6.4 – Permanency Performance 113 104 Tables Table 1: Summary of Target Outcomes 8 7 Table 2: Traditional Home Closure Reasons, July 2017-June – December 2018 26 23 Table 3: Home Closure Reason Responses to Exit Survey Question #1? 28 Applications For TFC Program Authorization with New Application Form 32 Table 4: Summary of Authorization Denial Reasons, Oct to Dec 2018 34 Table 5: Pinnacle Plan Caseload and Workload Standard Commitments 41 Table 5: Caseload Compliance by Worker Type – June 30, 2018 44 39 Table 6: Caseload Compliance of Eight Struggling Districts 46 41 Table 7: Number of workers with a Caseload over 200%, 2014 to 2018 47 Compliance by Worker Type 42 Table 8: Workload Spikes, Fall 2016, 2017 and 2018 44 Table 9: Caseload Compliance, Fall 2016, 2017 and 2018 44 Table 10: Child-Nights in Shelters by Age, January 2018 Change from Baseline to June 2018 54 Current Period 51 Table 911: Pinnacle Plan 1.17: June 2017 July 2018 to June December 2018 56 51 Table 1012: Youth with More than One Shelter Stay during Period 56 (N=118) 52 Table 11: Total Children who Experienced a Shelter Stay, January to June 2018 61 Table 1213: Rate of MIC by Placement Type, Current and Prior Report Periods 67 61 Table 1314: Placement Stability Baselines, Targets, and Current Performance 85 77 Table 1415: Percent of Children Whose First Countable Placement is a Kinship Home 87 78 Table 1516: First Placement of Children Removed between January July and June December 2018 92 83 Table 1617: Top Three Exit Reasons for First Placement Moves 92 83 Table 1718: Measure 6.2b, Permanency Rates by Report Period 101 Children Who Achieved Permanency within 2 years (Most Recent on Left Side) 91 Table 1819: Measure 6.2c, Permanency Rates by Report Period 103 Children Who Achieved Permanency within 3 years (Most Recent on Left Side) 93 Table 1920: Number of Children who became Legally Free Each Report Period under Metric 6.5 107 97 Table 2021: Metric 6.6 - Trial Adoption Disruptions by Placement/Quad Type 99 Table 22: Metric 6.1 – Permanency Performance 111 Appendices 102 Appendix Appendix A: Metric Plan Baselines and Targets (Updated September 2015) 115 Appendix B: Xxxxxx Care Survey Results 124 Appendix C: Xxxxxx Home Closure Reason Instruction 131 Appendix D: TFC Treatment Team Guide 132 Appendix E: Shelter Authorization Form 134 Appendix F: Progressive Shelter Staffing Guide 138 Appendix G: MIC Expanded Core Strategies 141 Appendix H: MIC Heightened Placement Protocols in Group Homes 145 Glossary Glossary 1: Acronyms 147107

Appears in 2 contracts

Samples: Settlement Agreement, Settlement Agreement

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

FIGURES. Figure 1: Number of Children in DHS Custody at the End of SFY - 2004 to 2018 16 2020 18 Figure 2: Children in Custody on June 30, 2018 2020 by Age Group 17 (Total = 7,730) 19 Figure 3: Children in Custody Care on June 30, 2018 2020 by Length of Stay 18 (Total = 7,730) 20 Figure 4 4: Children in Custody Care on June 30, 2018 2020 by Placement Type 19 (Total = 7,730) 21 Figure 5: New Xxxxxx Care Homes Developed by Month, July 2017-2019 – June 2018 20 2020 22 Figure 6: New Xxxxxx Homes by Type, July 2017-2019 – June 2018 21 2020 (N=832) 23 Figure 7: New Therapeutic Xxxxxx Homes by Month, July 2017-2019 – June 2018 33 2020 32 Figure 8: Worker Caseloads: Percent of Workers Meeting Caseload Standards 43 46 Figure 9: Supervisor Workloads: Percent of Supervisors Meeting Workload Standards 48 53 Figure 10: Metrics 5.1 – Shelter-Nights, Children Ages 0 - 1 51 57 Figure 11: Metric 5.2 – Shelter-Nights, Children Ages 2 – 5 52 58 Figure 12: Metric 5.3 – Shelter-Nights, Children Ages 6 – 12 53 59 Figure 13: Metric 5.4 – Shelter-Nights, Children Ages 13 and Old 54 Older 60 Figure 14: Number of Children Six Years and Older with a Shelter Stay Jan 2015 to June 2018 55 Figure 15: Metric 1a – Absence of Maltreatment in Care by Resource Caregivers 64 67 Figure 1615: Metric 1b – Absence of Maltreatment in Care by Parents 66 68 Figure 1716: Metric 3.1 – Frequency of Visits by All Workers 81 83 Figure 1817: Metric 3.2 – Frequency of Primary Worker Visits 82 85 Figure 1918: Metric 3.3b – Continuity of Primary Worker Visits Over Six Months 83 86 Figure 2019: Metric 6.2a – Permanency within 12 Months of Removal 94 99 Figure 21: Reduction in Short-Term Removals 95 Figure 2220: Metric 6.2b – Permanency within 2 years of Removal 100 107 Figure 2321: Metric 6.2c – Permanency within 3 years of Removal 102 109 Figure 2422: Metric 6.2d – Permanency within 4 years of Removal 104 111 Figure 2523: Metric 6.3 – Re-entry within 12 Months of Exit 105 112 Figure 2624: Metric 6.5 – Permanency Performance 106 113 Figure 2725: Metric 6.6 – Permanency Performance 108 116 Figure 2826: Metric 6.7 – Permanency Performance 110 119 Figure 2927: Metric 6.4 – Permanency Performance 113 122 Tables Table 1: Summary of Target Outcomes 8 9 Table 2: Traditional Home Closure Reasons, July 2017-2019 – June 2018 2020 26 Table 3: Home Closure Reason Responses to Exit Survey Question #1? 28 Applications for TFC/ITFC Placement and Service Authorization 36 Table 4: Needs Analysis – Number of Children Who Require Therapeutic Placements 40 Table 5: Pinnacle Plan Caseload and Workload Standard Commitments 41 Table 5: Caseload Compliance by Worker Type – June 30, 2018 44 45 Table 6: End of Period, Point in Time Caseload Compliance of Eight Struggling Districts 46 Table 7: Number Worker Caseloads Capacity and Compliance as of workers with a Caseload over 200%June 30, 2014 to 2018 47 2020 49 Table 8: Child-Nights in Shelters by Age, January 2018 to 2020 – June 2018 54 2020 61 Table 9: Pinnacle Plan 1.17: Baseline and January – June 2017 to June 2018 56 2020 62 Table 10: Youth with More than One Shelter Stay during Period 56 Table 11: Total Children who Experienced a Shelter Stay, January to June 2018 61 Table 12: Rate of MIC by Placement Type, Current Current, Last and Prior Report Periods 67 69 Table 11: MIC Investigation Case Review, January – December 2019 71 Table 12: Analysis of Quality Visits in MIC Case Reviews, Jan-Dec 2019 72 Table 13: Required Monthly Visits Conducted Face to Face vs. Virtually 83 Table 14: Placement Stability Baselines, Targets, and Current Performance 85 88 Table 1415: Percent of Children Whose First Countable Placement is a Kinship Home 87 Table 15: First Placement of Children Removed between January and June 2018 92 90 Table 16: Top Three Exit Reasons Comparison of Federal and Oklahoma Measures for First Placement Moves 92 Timely Permanency 97 Table 17: Measure 6.2a, Permanency Rates by Report Period 100 Table 18: Measure 6.2b, Permanency Rates by Report Period 101 Children Who Achieved Permanency within 2 years (Most Recent on Left Side) 107 Table 1819: Measure 6.2c, Permanency Rates by Report Period 103 Children Who Achieved Permanency within 3 years (Most Recent on Left Side) 109 Table 1920: Number of Children who became Legally Free under Metric 6.5 107 114 Table 2021: Metric 6.6 - Trial Adoption Disruptions by Placement/Quad Type 117 Table 22: Metric 6.1 – Permanency Performance 111 Appendices 120 Appendix Appendix A: Metric Plan Baselines and Targets (Updated September 2015) 115 Appendix B: Xxxxxx Care Survey Results 124 Appendix C: Xxxxxx Home Closure Reason Instruction 131 Appendix D: TFC Treatment Team Guide 132 Appendix E: Shelter Authorization Form 134 Appendix F: Progressive Shelter Staffing Guide 138 Appendix G: MIC Expanded Core Strategies 141 Appendix H: MIC Heightened Placement Protocols in Group Homes 145 Glossary Glossary 1: Acronyms 147125

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Settlement Agreement

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.