Monitoring Locations. 3.3.1 Monitoring locations NMS2 was set up at the proposed locations in accordance with Project Specific EM&A Manual. However, for monitoring location NMS3 (Ho Yu College), as proposed in the Project Specific EM&A Manual, approval for carrying out impact monitoring could not be obtained from the principal of the school. Permission on setting up and carrying out impact monitoring works at nearby sensitive receivers, like Caribbean Coast and Coastal Skyline, was also sought. However, approvals for carrying out impact monitoring works within their premises were not obtained. Impact noise monitoring was conducted at site boundary of the site office area in Works Area WA2 (NMS3B) respectively. Same baseline noise level (as derived from the baseline monitoring data recorded at Ho Yu College) and Limit Level were adopted for this alternative noise monitoring location.
3.3.2 Figure 2 shows the locations of the monitoring stations. Table 3.2 describes the details of the monitoring stations.
Monitoring Locations. 4.4.1 In accordance with the Project Specific EM&A Manual, twenty-one stations (9 Impact Stations, 7 Sensitive Receiver Stations and 5 Control/Far Field Stations) were designated for impact water quality monitoring. The nine Impact Stations (IS) were chosen on the basis of their proximity to the reclamation and thus the greatest potential for water quality impacts, the seven Sensitive Receiver Stations (SR) were chosen as they are close to the key sensitive receives and the five Control/ Far Field Stations (CS) were chosen to facilitate comparison of the water quality of the IS stations with less influence by the Project/ ambient water quality conditions.
4.4.2 Due to safety concern and topographical condition of the original locations of SR4 and SR10B, alternative impact water quality monitoring stations, naming as SR4 (N) and SR10B (N), were adopted, which are situated in vicinity of the original impact water quality monitoring stations (SR4 and SR10B) and could be reachable.
4.4.3 Same baseline and Action Level for water quality, as derived from the baseline monitoring data recorded, were adopted for these alternative impact water quality monitoring stations.
4.4.4 The locations of these monitoring stations are summarized in Table 4.3 and depicted in Figure 3.
Monitoring Locations. Locations of Monitoring Station are shown in Figure 1.5, the same locations as set up for the Baseline Monitoring. These are as follows : - NSR-3 Pine Court NSR-9 Magnolia Villa
Monitoring Locations. 2.3.1 Monitoring locations AMS2 and AMS7 were set up at the proposed locations in accordance with Project Specific EM&A Manual. For AMS6 (Dragonair/CNAC (Group) Building), permission on setting up and carrying out impact monitoring works was sought, however, access to the premise has not been granted yet on this report issuing date. For monitoring location AMS3 (Ho Yu College), as proposed in the Project Specific EM&A Manual, approval for carrying out impact monitoring could not be obtained from the principal of the school. Permission on setting up and carrying out impact monitoring works at nearby sensitive receivers, like Caribbean Coast and Coastal Skyline, was also sought. However, approvals for carrying out impact monitoring works within their premises were not obtained. Impact air quality monitoring was conducted at site boundary of the site office area in Works Area WA2 (AMS3B) respectively. Same baseline and Action Level for air quality, as derived from the baseline monitoring data recorded at Ho Yu College, was adopted for this alternative air quality location.
2.3.2 Reference is made to ET’s proposal of the omission of air monitoring station (AMS 6) dated on 1 November 2012 and EPD’s letter dated on 19 November 2012 regarding the conditional approval of the proposed omission of air monitoring station (AMS 6) for Contract No. HY/2010/02. The aforesaid omission of Monitoring Station AMS6 is effective since 19 November 2012.
2.3.3 Figure 2 shows the locations of monitoring stations. Table 2.2 describes the details of the monitoring stations.
Monitoring Locations. 2.3.1 Monitoring locations AMS2 and AMS7 were set up at the proposed locations in accordance with Project Specific EM&A Manual. For AMS6 (Dragonair/CNAC (Group) Building), permission on setting up and carrying out impact monitoring works was sought, however, access to the premise has not been granted yet on this report issuing date. For monitoring location AMS3 (Ho Yu College), as proposed in the Project Specific EM&A Manual, approval for carrying out impact monitoring could not be obtained from the principal of the school. Permission on setting up and carrying out impact monitoring works at nearby sensitive receivers, like Caribbean Coast and Coastal Skyline, was also sought. However, approvals for carrying out impact monitoring works within their premises were not obtained. Impact air quality monitoring was conducted at site boundary of the site office area in Works Area WA2 (AMS3B) respectively. Same baseline and Action Level for air quality, as derived from the baseline monitoring data recorded at Ho Yu College, was adopted for this alternative air quality location.
2.3.2 It was observed that a tree near AMS3B may affect the wind flow around the HVS located at AMS3B. With no further comment received from IEC, the HVS at AMS3B has been relocated on 8 September 2014 to slightly more than 2 meters separation from it, measured horizontally. Same baseline and Action Level for air quality, as derived from the baseline monitoring data recorded at Ho Yu College, was adopted for this alternative air quality location.
2.3.3 Reference is made to ET’s proposal of the omission of air monitoring station (AMS 6) dated on 1 November 2012 and EPD’s letter dated on 19 November 2012 regarding the conditional approval of the proposed omission of air monitoring station (AMS 6) for Contract No. HY/2010/02. The aforesaid omission of Monitoring Station AMS6 is effective since 19 November 2012.
2.3.4 Reference is made to ET’s proposal of relocation of air quality monitoring station (AMS7) dated on 2 February 2015, with no further comment received from IEC on 2 February 2015 and no objection received from EPD on 5 February 2015, the impact air quality monitoring station AMS7 (Hong Kong SkyCity Marriott Hotel) has been relocated to AMS7A (Chu Kong Air-Sea Union Transportation Company Limited) on 3 February 2015. Action Level for air quality, as derived from the baseline monitoring data recorded at Hong Kong SkyCity Marriott Hotel, was adopted for this alternative air quality loc...
Monitoring Locations. The water monitoring works for the Contract are covered by Contract Xx. XX/0000/00 Xxxx Xxxx- Xxxxxx-Xxxxx Xxxxxx XXXXX – Passenger Clearance Building. The ET of the Contract or another ET of the HZMB project is required to conduct water quality monitoring at twenty one stations (9 Impact Stations, 7 Sensitive Receiver Stations and 5 Control/Far Field Stations). Due to topographical conditions of XX0, XX00X and SR10B(N), the water quality monitoring (WQM) stations was proposed to be monitored at alternative WQM stations named as SR3(N), SR10A (N) and SR10B(N2). The proposal for alternation of water quality monitoring stations for HZMB HKBCF was justified by the ET Leader for Contract No. HY/2013/01 on 08 November 2017 and verified by the IEC on 13 November 2017; and submitted to EPD on 29 November 2017, and it was approved by EPD on 22 December 2017. Table 4.1 and Figure 2 shows the locations of water quality monitoring stations.
Table 4.1 Water Quality Monitoring Stations (construction phases) Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxx Xxxx Xxxxx
Monitoring Locations. The dolphin monitoring works for the Contract are covered by Contract Xx. XX/0000/00 Xxxx Xxxx- Xxxxxx-Xxxxx Xxxxxx XXXXX – Passenger Clearance Building. The ET of the Contract or another ET of the HZMB project is required to conduct dolphin monitoring at 24 transects as part of EM&A programme if these transects are no longer covered under Contract No. HY/2013/01. The dolphin monitoring should adopt line-transect vessel survey method. The survey follows pre-set and fixed transect lines in the two areas defined by AFCD as: Northeast Lantau survey area; and Northwest Lantau survey area. Figure 3 shows the co-ordinates for the transect lines and layout map.
Monitoring Locations. 2.1.1. The air quality monitoring works for the Contract are covered by Contract Xx. XX/0000/00 Xxxx Xxxx- Xxxxxx-Xxxxx Xxxxxx XXXXX – Passenger Clearance Building and Xxxxxxxx Xx. XX/0000/00 Xxxx Xxxx-Xxxxxx-Xxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxx Xxxx Link Road – Section between Scenic Hill and HKBCF. The ET of the Contract or another ET of the HZMB project is required to conduct impact air quality monitoring at AMS6 and AMS7 as part of EM&A programme if these air quality monitoring stations are no longer covered under Contract No. HY/2013/01 and HY/2011/03. Table 2.1 and Figure 1 shows the locations of air monitoring stations.
Monitoring Locations. 3.1.1. The noise monitoring works for the Contract are covered by Contract Xx. XX/0000/00 Xxxx Xxxx- Xxxxxx-Xxxxx Xxxxxx XXXXX – Passenger Clearance Building. The ET of the Contract or another ET of the HZMB project is required to conduct noise monitoring at NMS2 and NMS3B as part of EM&A programme if these monitoring stations are no longer covered under Contract No. HY/2013/01. Table
Monitoring Locations. Noise Monitoring Result
