Final Evaluation Rating Sample Clauses

Final Evaluation Rating. The final summative evaluation rating that is assigned to a teacher based on the holistic review of all Evaluation Factors observed and evidence obtained during the Evaluation Cycle. The rating shall be “accomplished,” “skilled,” “developing,” or “ineffective.” The final rating shall not be weighted in such a way that one (1) component of the evaluation system has a higher importance than another, except that any area marked N/A shall not negatively impact the evaluation.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Final Evaluation Rating. Each employee will receive a Final Evaluation Rating of 1 (Unsatisfactory), 2 (Basic), 3 (Proficient) or 4 (Distinguished), which combines his or her State Criteria Rating and Student Growth Score using the Evaluation Scoring and Rating Guide. 12.4.5.1 Examine extenuating circumstances possibly including: goal setting process/expectations, student attendance, and curriculum/assessment alignment. 12.4.5.2 Conduct two (2) additional thirty-minute (30) observations. 12.4.5.3 Schedule monthly conferences with evaluator to discuss/revise goals, progress toward meeting goals, and best practices. 12.4.5.4 Create and implement a professional development plan to address student growth areas.
Final Evaluation Rating. The final, summative holistic rating that is assigned to a teacher based on evaluations that are conducted pursuant to the terms of this agreement. The evaluation rating is assigned at the conclusion of the evaluation cycle. Each completed evaluation will result in the assignment of a teacher to one of the following evaluation ratings: Accomplished, Skilled, Developing or Ineffective. Ineffective Developing Skilled Accomplished • Professional Growth/Improvement Plan • Formal Holistic Observation Followed by Conference • Classroom Walkthroughs • Formal Focused Observation Emphasis on Focus Area(s) • Final Summative ConferenceProfessional Growth Plan • One Observation • One Conference with Discussion of Progress on PGP

Related to Final Evaluation Rating

  • Industry Ratings The City will only accept coverage from an insurance carrier who offers proof that it: a. Is authorized to do business in the State of Kansas; b. Carries a Best's policyholder rating of A- or better; and c. Carries at least a Class VIII financial rating; or d. Is a company mutually agreed upon by the City and Consulting Engineer/Architect.

  • Moody’s Xxxxx’x Investors Service, Inc. and its successors.

  • Debt Rating The Liquidity Provider has a short-term debt ratings of “P-1” from Xxxxx’x and “F1+” from Fitch.

  • No Ratings There are no securities or preferred stock of or guaranteed by the Company or any of its subsidiaries that are rated by a “nationally recognized statistical rating organization,” as such term is defined under Section 3(a)(62) under the 1934 Act.

  • Debt Ratings Prompt notice of any change in its Debt Ratings.

  • Insurance Carrier Rating Coverages provided by Contractor must be underwritten by an insurance company deemed acceptable to the State of Washington’s Office of Risk Management. Insurance coverage shall be provided by companies authorized to do business within the State of Washington and rated A- Class VII or better in the most recently published edition of Best’s Insurance Rating. Enterprise Services reserves the right to reject all or any insurance carrier(s) with an unacceptable financial rating.

  • Ratings No “nationally recognized statistical rating organization” as such term is defined for purposes of Rule 436(g)(2) (i) has imposed (or has informed the Company that it is considering imposing) any condition (financial or otherwise) on the Company’s retaining any rating assigned to the Company or any securities of the Company or (ii) has indicated to the Company that it is considering any of the actions described in Section 7(c)(ii) hereof.

  • PRIORITY RATING If so identified, this Contract is a "rated order" certified for national defense, emergency preparedness, and energy program use, and SELLER shall follow all the requirements of the Defense Priorities and Allocation System Regulation (15 C.F.R. Part 700).

  • Maintenance of Rating Since the execution of this Agreement, there shall not have been any decrease in or withdrawal of the rating of any securities of the Company or any of its subsidiaries (including the Bank) by any “nationally recognized statistical rating organization” (as defined for purposes of Section 3(a)(62) of the 0000 Xxx) or any notice given of any intended or potential decrease in or withdrawal of any such rating or of a possible change in any such rating that does not indicate the direction of the possible change.

  • Rating The Notes can be issued without the requirement that they have any rating from a nationally recognized statistical rating organization.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!