General Plan Litigation Sample Clauses

General Plan Litigation. CITY has determined that this Agreement is consistent with its Comprehensive General Plan, as such General Plan exists as of the Effective Date (“General Plan”), and that the General Plan meets all requirements of law. OWNER has reviewed the General Plan and concurs with CITY’s determination. CITY shall have no liability in damages under this Agreement for any failure of CITY to perform under this Agreement or the inability of OWNER to develop the Property as contemplated by the Development Plan of this Agreement as the result of a judicial determination that on the Effective Date, or at any time thereafter, the General Plan, or portions thereof, are invalid or inadequate or not in compliance with law.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (11)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
General Plan Litigation. COUNTY has determined that this Agreement is consistent with its General Plan, and that the General Plan meets all requirements of law. OWNER has reviewed the General Plan and concurs with COUNTY’s determination. The parties acknowledge that: (a) Litigation may be filed challenging the legality, validity and adequacy of the General Plan; and, (b) If successful, such challenges could delay or prevent the performance of this Agreement and the development of the Property. COUNTY shall have no liability in damages under this Agreement for any failure of COUNTY to perform under this Agreement or the inability of OWNER to develop the Property as contemplated by the Development Plan of this Agreement as the result of a judicial determination that on the Effective Date, or at any time thereafter, the General Plan, or portions thereof, are invalid or inadequate or not in compliance with law.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (9)
General Plan Litigation. The City has determined that this Agreement is consistent with its General Plan. The Owner has reviewed the General Plan and concurs with the City’s determination. The City shall have no liability under this Agreement or otherwise for any failure of the City to perform under this Agreement, or for the inability of the Owner to develop the Property as contemplated by the Development Plan, which failure to perform or inability to develop is as the result of a judicial determination that the General Plan, or portions thereof, are invalid or inadequate or not in compliance with law, or that this Agreement or any of the City’s actions in adopting it were invalid, inadequate, or not in compliance with law.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (7)
General Plan Litigation. The City has determined that this Agreement is consistent with its General Plan. The Owner has reviewed the General Plan and concurs with the City’s determination.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (5)
General Plan Litigation. 9.2 Third Party Litigation Concerning Agreement ............................................................ 9.3 Indemnity .....................................................................................................................
Sample 1Sample 2
General Plan Litigation. The City has determined that this Agreement is consistent with its General Plan. Owner has reviewed the General Plan and concurs with the City's determination. The City shall have no liability under this Agreement or otherwise for any failure of the City to perform under this Agreement, or for the inability of Owner to develop the Property as contemplated by the Development Plan, which failure to perform or inability to develop is as the result of a judicial determination that the General Plan, or portions thereof, are invalid or inadequate or not in compliance with law, or that this Agreement or any of the City's actions in adopting it were invalid, inadequate, or not in compliance with law. Notwithstanding the foregoing, neither party shall contend in any administrative or judicial proceeding that the Agreement or any Development Approval is unenforceable based upon federal, state or local statutes, ordinances or regulations in effect on the Effective Date.
Sample 1Sample 2
General Plan Litigation. The City has determined that this Agreement is consistent with its General Plan as amended by Measure T, and that the General Plan meets all requirements of law. The Developer has reviewed the General Plan and concurs with the City’s determination. The parties acknowledge that the City shall have no liability to the Developer under this Agreement for any failure of the Developer to perform under this Agreement or the inability of the Developer to develop the Property as contemplated by the Development Plan or this Agreement as the result of a judicial determination that on the Effective Date, or at any time thereafter, the General Plan, or portions thereof, are invalid or inadequate or not in compliance with law. In the event a determination is made that the General Plan, or portions thereof, is invalid, inadequate or not in compliance with law, the Developer shall have the right, upon delivery of written notice to the City, to terminate this Agreement.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
General Plan Litigation. City has determined that this Agreement is consistent with its General Plan, the Otay Ranch GDP and the SPA Plan. Owner has reviewed the General Plan, the Otay Ranch GDP and the SPA Plan and concurs with City’s determination. City shall not have any liability, whether through equitable or legal arguments, under this Agreement or the associated approvals or documents (e.g., General Plan Amendment, SPA Plan, tentative maps), for any failure of City to perform under this Agreement, or for the inability of Owner to develop the Property as contemplated by the Project Approvals or this Agreement, if such failure or inability is the result of a judicial determination that part or all of the General Plan, Otay Ranch GDP or SPA Plan is invalid, inadequate, or not in compliance with law.
Sample 1
General Plan Litigation. COUNTY has determined that this Agreement is ----------------------- consistent with its Comprehensive General Plan, herein called General Plan, and that the General Plan meets all requirements of law. OWNER has reviewed the General Plan and concurs with COUNTY's determination. The parties acknowledge that: (a) Litigation is now pending challenging the legality, validity and adequacy of certain provisions of the General Plan; and, (b) In the future there may be other similar challenges to the General Plan; and, (c) If successful, such challenges could delay or prevent the performance of this Agreement and the development of the Property. COUNTY shall have no liability in damages under this Agreement for any failure of COUNTY to perform under this Agreement or the inability of OWNER to develop the Property as contemplated by the Development Plan of this Agreement as the result of a judicial determination that on the Effective Date, or at any time thereafter, the General Plan, or portions thereof, are invalid or inadequate or not in compliance with law. 09/04/97 48
Sample 1

Related to General Plan Litigation

  • Transaction Litigation From and after the date of this Agreement until the earlier of the Acquisition Merger Closing or termination of this Agreement in accordance with its terms, SPAC, on the one hand, and the Company, on the other hand, shall each notify the other in writing promptly after learning of any stockholder demands, other stockholder Actions (including derivative claims) or Actions brought by any third-party relating to this Agreement, any related agreements or any matters relating thereto (collectively, the “Transaction Litigation”) commenced against, in the case of SPAC, any of SPAC or its Subsidiaries or any of their respective Representatives (in their capacity as a Representative of SPAC or any of its Subsidiaries), or, in the case of the Company, any of the Company or its Subsidiaries or any of their respective Representatives (in their capacity as a Representative of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries). SPAC and the Company shall each (i) keep the other reasonably informed regarding any Transaction Litigation, (ii) give the other the opportunity to, at its own cost and expense, participate in the defense, settlement and compromise of any such Transaction Litigation and reasonably cooperate with the other in connection with the defense, settlement and compromise of any such Transaction Litigation, (iii) consider in good faith the other’s advice with respect to any such Transaction Litigation and (iv) reasonably cooperate with each other; provided, however, that in no event shall (x) SPAC or any of its Subsidiaries or any of their respective Representatives settle or compromise any Transaction Litigation without the prior written consent of the Company (not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed), or (y) the Company or any of its Subsidiaries any or any of their respective Representatives settle or compromise any Transaction Litigation without the prior written consent of SPAC (not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed).

  • Cooperation in Litigation Each party hereto will reasonably cooperate with the other in the defense or prosecution of any litigation or proceeding already instituted or which may be instituted hereafter against or by such party relating to or arising out of the use of the Purchased Assets prior to the Effective Date (other than litigation arising out of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement). The party requesting such cooperation shall pay the out-of-pocket expenses (including legal fees and disbursements) of the party providing such cooperation and of its officers, directors, employees, other personnel and agents reasonably incurred in connection with providing such cooperation, but shall not be responsible to reimburse the party providing such cooperation for such party's time spent in such cooperation or the salaries or costs of fringe benefits or similar expenses paid by the party providing such cooperation to its officers, directors, employees, other personnel and agents while assisting in the defense or prosecution of any such litigation or proceeding.

  • Claims and Litigation No pending or, to the Company's knowledge, threatened, claims, suits or other proceedings exist with respect to any Employee Benefit Plan other than normal benefit claims filed by participants or beneficiaries.

  • Certain Litigation The Company agrees that it ------------------- shall not settle any litigation commenced after the date hereof against the Company or any of its directors by any stockholder of the Company relating to the Offer, the Merger, this Agreement or the Stockholder Agreements, without the prior written consent of Parent. In addition, the Company shall not voluntarily cooperate with any third party that may hereafter seek to restrain or prohibit or otherwise oppose the Offer or the Merger and shall cooperate with Parent and Sub to resist any such effort to restrain or prohibit or otherwise oppose the Offer or the Merger.

  • Shareholder Litigation The Company shall give Parent the opportunity to participate in the defense or settlement of any shareholder litigation against the Company and/or its directors relating to the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, and no such settlement shall be agreed to without Parent’s prior written consent.

  • Stockholder Litigation The Company shall give Parent the opportunity to participate in the defense or settlement of any stockholder litigation against the Company and/or its directors relating to the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, and no such settlement shall be agreed to without Parent’s prior written consent.

  • Cooperation With Regard to Litigation Executive agrees to cooperate with the Company, during the term and thereafter (including following Executive’s termination of employment for any reason), by making himself available to testify on behalf of the Company or any subsidiary or affiliate of the Company, in any action, suit, or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative, or investigative, and to assist the Company, or any subsidiary or affiliate of the Company, in any such action, suit, or proceeding, by providing information and meeting and consulting with the Board or its representatives or counsel, or representatives or counsel to the Company, or any subsidiary or affiliate of the Company, as may be reasonably requested and after taking into account Executive’s post-termination responsibilities and obligations. The Company agrees to reimburse Executive, on an after-tax basis, for all reasonable expenses actually incurred in connection with his provision of testimony or assistance.

  • Disputes and Litigation In the event of a dispute concerning the tenancy created by this agreement, TENANT agrees that whether or not the premises are being actively managed by an AGENT for the record OWNER, TENANT agrees to hold AGENT, its heirs, employees and assigns harmless and shall look solely to the record OWNER of the premises in the event of a legal dispute. INTEGRATION: This lease and exhibits and attachments, if any, set forth the entire agreement between LANDLORD and TENANT concerning the premises, and there are no covenants, promises, agreements, conditions, or understandings, oral or written between them other than those herein set forth. If any provision in this agreement is illegal, invalid or unenforceable, that provision shall be void but all other terms and conditions of the agreement shall be in effect. MODIFICATIONS: No subsequent alteration, amendment, change or addition to this lease shall be binding upon LANDLORD unless reduced to writing and signed by the parties. RADON GAS: State law requires the following notice to be given: "Radon is a naturally occurring radioactive gas that, when it has accumulated in a building in sufficient quantities, may present health risks to persons who are exposed to it over time. Levels of radon that exceed federal and state guidelines have been found in buildings in Florida. Additional information regarding radon and radon testing may be obtained from your county public health unit." ABANDONED PROPERTY: BY SIGNING THIS RENTAL AGREEMENT, THE TENANT AGREES THAT UPON SURRENDER, ABANDONMENT, OR RECOVERY OF POSSESSION OF THE DWELLING UNIT DUE TO THE DEATH OF THE LAST REMAINING TENANT, AS PROVIDED BY CHAPTER 83, FLORIDA STATUTES, THE LANDLORD SHALL NOT BE LIABLE OR RESPONSIBLE FOR STORAGE OR DISPOSITION OF THE TENANT'S PERSONAL PROPERTY. ADDITIONAL STIPULATIONS:

  • Third Party Litigation In the event that a Third Party institutes a patent or other infringement suit against any of NovaDel, PAR or HANA or any of its respective Affiliates during the Term, alleging manufacture, use or sale of a Licensed Product in the Territory, infringes one or more patent or other intellectual property rights held by such Third Party (an “Infringement Suit”), the Parties shall cooperate with one another in defending such suit. PAR, as the NDA holder, shall have the first right to direct and control, at its expense, any Infringement Suit (including settlement negotiations, settlement or compromise thereof) to the extent that it relates to the manufacture, use or sale of a Licensed Product but does not implicate the Licensed Technology or Licensed Process. In the event that the Infringement Suit relates to the use of the Licensed Technology or Licensed Process, NovaDel shall have the first right to direct and control, at its expense, any such Infringement Suit (including settlement negotiations, settlement or compromise thereof). To the extent that any amounts become payable to any Third Party as a result of such action, whether through judgment or settlement, then PAR shall, unless HANA is jointly promoting and commercializing the Licensed Product pursuant to Section 2.4 and subject to Section 12.2, bear [***] percent ([***]%) of such amounts with respect to the Exploitation of the Licensed Product; provided, however, that PAR shall have the right to credit [***] percent ([***]%) of any amounts paid by PAR through judgment or settlement with respect to such country against the royalty payments to be paid by PAR to HANA with respect to the sale of the Licensed Product under Section 6.3; provided further, however, that no royalty payment when due, regardless of the amount or number of credits available to PAR shall be reduced by more than [***] percent ([***]%) of the amounts otherwise owed pursuant to Section 6.3 in any calendar quarter. Credits not exhausted in any calendar quarter may be carried into future calendar quarters. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event that no payments are due or owing, or contemplated to be due or owing, by PAR to HANA under Article 6 with respect to the sale of the Licensed Product, then NovaDel shall pay to PAR such amount owed to a Third Party up to a cap of [***]% of such amount owed to such Third Party, less any amount already credited to PAR under this Section 10.3. Notwithstanding the foregoing, NovaDel shall have no obligation under this Section 10.3 for any costs, expenses or damages that are paid or payable to a Third Party as a result of an actual or alleged infringement by PAR or HANA to the extent such costs, expenses or damages result from the use of a Product Trademark.

  • Assistance in Litigation Employee shall upon reasonable notice, furnish such information and proper assistance to the Company as it may reasonably require in connection with any litigation in which it is, or may become, a party either during or after employment.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!