Grounds on which Banning of Business Dealings can be initiated Sample Clauses

Grounds on which Banning of Business Dealings can be initiated. 6.1 If the security consideration, including questions of loyalty of the Agency to the State, so warrants; 6.2 If the Director/Owner of the Agency, proprietor or partner of the firm, is convicted by a Court of Law for offences involving moral turpitude in relation to its business dealings with the Government or any other public sector enterprises or NACIL, during the last five years; 6.3 If there is strong justification for believing that the Directors, Proprietors, Partners, owner of the Agency have been guilty of malpractices such as bribery, corruption, fraud, substitution of tenders, interpolations, etc; 6.4 If the Agency continuously refuses to return/refund the dues of NACIL without showing adequate reason and this is not due to any reasonable dispute which would attract proceedings in arbitration or Court of Law; 6.5 If the Agency employs a public servant dismissed/removed or employs a person convicted for an offence involving corruption or abetment of such offence; 6.6 If business dealings with the Agency have been banned by the Govt. or any other public sector enterprise; 6.7 If the Agency has resorted to Corrupt, fraudulent practices, coercion, undue influence and other violations including misrepresentation of facts; 6.8 If the Agency uses intimidation/threatening or brings undue outside pressure on the Company (NACIL) or its official in acceptance/ performances of the job under the contract; 6.9 If the Agency indulges in repeated and/or deliberate use of delay tactics in complying with contractual stipulations; 6.10 Wilful indulgence by the Agency in supplying sub-standard material irrespective of whether pre-despatch inspection was carried out by Company (NACIL) or not; 6.11 Based on the findings of the investigation report of CBI/Police/internal Vigilance or any other investigative agency including Government Audit against the Agency for malafide/unlawful acts or improper conduct on his part in matters relating to the Company (NACIL) or even otherwise; 6.12 Established litigant nature of the Agency to derive undue benefit; 6.13 Continued poor performance of the Agency in several contracts; 6.14 If the Agency misuses the premises or facilities of the Company (NACIL), forcefully occupies tampers or damages the Company’s properties including land, water resources, forests / trees, etc.

Grounds on which Banning of Business Dealings can be initiated. 6.1 If the security consideration, including questions of loyalty of the Agency to the State, so warrants; 6.2 If the Director/Owner of the Agency, proprietor or partner of the firm, is convicted by a Court of Law for offences involving moral turpitude in relation to its business dealings with the Government or any other public sector enterprises or AIR INDIA LIMITED , during the last five years; 6.3 If there is strong justification for believing that the Directors, Proprietors, Partners, owner of the Agency have been guilty of malpractices such as bribery, corruption, fraud, substitution of tenders, interpolations, etc; 6.4 If the Agency continuously refuses to return/refund the dues of AIR INDIA LIMITED without showing adequate reason and this is not due to any reasonable dispute which would attract proceedings in arbitration or Court of Law;

Grounds on which Banning of Business Dealings can be initiated. If the security consideration, including questions of loyalty of the Agency to the State, so warrants;