Handling Inconsistencies Sample Clauses

Handling Inconsistencies. As described in Section 2, this protocol relaxes the requirement for consistency of the contract state across the customer and resource provider. In doing so we gain the availability of resources for booking as they are never in a state between ‘not- booked’ and ‘booked’, unlike in a protocol based on a transactional approach in which resources need to be reserved until a transaction completes or aborts. This section describes how inconsistencies between the customer and provider are han- dled through the protocol, illustrated through two example message exchanges. Example 1 With both the customer and the resource provider in the contracted state, the customer sends a RenegotiationOffer offer with identifier A to the provider and moves to the renegotiating state. Unfortunately, this message is lost on the network, thus the two parties have inconsistent states. This scenario is shown in Figure 2. Upon not receiving a reply to their RenegotiationOffer, the customer may keep resending the same message until they receive a response from the resource provider. Resending a RenegotiationOffer is not a problem as it can only be ac- cepted or rejected once. Thus, the customer can be confident that they will not be contracted multiple times. In Figure 2, the provider returns a RenegotiationAccept with an identifier B and a correlation identifier A to indicate which offer is being accepted. Following the receipt of the RenegotiationAccept the customer will be in the same state as the provider when the provider sent the xxxxxxxx0. Example 2 Figure 3 shows the customer and the provider in the renegotiating state after the customer sends RenegotiationOffer with identifier Y. The provider sends a RenegotiationAccept with identifier Z and correlation identifier Y in re- sponse. The accept message is lost and the customer and the resource provider are in inconsistent states. As in Example 1, the customer may keep resending the RenegotiationOffer until it receives a response.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Handling Inconsistencies. As described in Section 2, this protocol relaxes the requirement for consistency of the contract state across the customer and resource provider. In doing so we gain the availability of resources for booking as they are never in a state between ‘not- booked’ and ‘booked’, unlike in a protocol based on a transactional approach in which resources need to be reserved until a transaction completes or aborts. This section describes how inconsistencies between the customer and provider are han- dled through the protocol, illustrated through two example message exchanges.
Sample 1

Related to Handling Inconsistencies

  • Inconsistencies In the event of any inconsistency between any provision of this Agreement and any provision of any Company arrangement, the provisions of this Agreement shall control, unless Executive and the Company otherwise agree in a writing that expressly refers to the provision of this Agreement that is being waived.

  • Inconsistency In the event of any inconsistency between the provisions of the Schedule and the other provisions of this Master Agreement, the Schedule will prevail. In the event of any inconsistency between the provisions of any Confirmation and this Master Agreement (including the Schedule), such Confirmation will prevail for the purpose of the relevant Transaction.

  • Inconsistencies with Other Documents In the event there is a conflict or inconsistency between this Agreement and any other Loan Document, the terms of this Agreement shall control; provided that any provision of the Security Documents which imposes additional burdens on the Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries or further restricts the rights of the Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries or gives the Administrative Agent or Lenders additional rights shall not be deemed to be in conflict or inconsistent with this Agreement and shall be given full force and effect.

  • Attachments, inconsistencies and severability This Consortium Agreement consists of this core text and Attachment 1 (Background included) Attachment 2 (Accession document) Attachment 3 (List of Third Parties for simplified transfer according to Section 8.2.2) Attachment 4 (Identified Affiliated Entities) In case the terms of this Consortium Agreement are in conflict with the terms of the Grant Agreement, the terms of the latter shall prevail. In case of conflicts between the attachments and the core text of this Consortium Agreement, the latter shall prevail. Should any provision of this Consortium Agreement become invalid, illegal or unenforceable, it shall not affect the validity of the remaining provisions of this Consortium Agreement. In such a case, the Parties concerned shall be entitled to request that a valid and practicable provision be negotiated which fulfils the purpose of the original provision.

  • SECTION HEADINGS; INCONSISTENCY The section headings used in this Agreement are included solely for convenience and shall not affect, or be used in connection with, the interpretation of this Agreement. In the event of any inconsistency between the terms of this Agreement and any form, award, plan or policy of the Company, the terms of this Agreement shall govern and control.

  • Review of legality and data minimisation (a) The data importer agrees to review the legality of the request for disclosure, in particular whether it remains within the powers granted to the requesting public authority, and to challenge the request if, after careful assessment, it concludes that there are reasonable grounds to consider that the request is unlawful under the laws of the country of destination, applicable obligations under international law and principles of international comity. The data importer shall, under the same conditions, pursue possibilities of appeal. When challenging a request, the data importer shall seek interim measures with a view to suspending the effects of the request until the competent judicial authority has decided on its merits. It shall not disclose the personal data requested until required to do so under the applicable procedural rules. These requirements are without prejudice to the obligations of the data importer under Clause 14(e). (b) The data importer agrees to document its legal assessment and any challenge to the request for disclosure and, to the extent permissible under the laws of the country of destination, make the documentation available to the data exporter. It shall also make it available to the competent supervisory authority on request.

  • Conflict or Inconsistency In the event of a conflict or inconsistency between the Additional Provisions and the provisions in Schedule “A”, the following rules will apply: (a) the Parties will interpret any Additional Provisions in so far as possible, in a way that preserves the intention of the Parties as expressed in Schedule “A”; and (b) where it is not possible to interpret the Additional Provisions in a way that is consistent with the provisions in Schedule “A”, the Additional Provisions will prevail over the provisions in Schedule “A” to the extent of the inconsistency.

  • Consistency The Corporate Taxpayer and the Members agree to report and cause to be reported for all purposes, including federal, state and local Tax purposes and financial reporting purposes, all Tax-related items (including the Basis Adjustments and each Tax Benefit Payment) in a manner consistent with that specified by the Corporate Taxpayer in any Schedule required to be provided by or on behalf of the Corporate Taxpayer under this Agreement unless otherwise required by law. Any dispute as to required Tax or financial reporting shall be subject to Section 7.09.

  • Inconsistencies with Other Documents; Independent Effect of Covenants (a) In the event there is a conflict or inconsistency between this Agreement and any other Loan Document, the terms of this Agreement shall control; provided that any provision of the Security Documents which imposes additional burdens on the Borrower or its Subsidiaries or further restricts the rights of the Borrower or its Subsidiaries or gives the Administrative Agent or Lenders additional rights shall not be deemed to be in conflict or inconsistent with this Agreement and shall be given full force and effect. (b) The Borrower expressly acknowledges and agrees that each covenant contained in Articles VIII, IX, or X hereof shall be given independent effect. Accordingly, the Borrower shall not engage in any transaction or other act otherwise permitted under any covenant contained in Articles VIII, IX, or X if, before or after giving effect to such transaction or act, the Borrower shall or would be in breach of any other covenant contained in Articles VIII, IX, or X.

  • Contract Consistency With Other Laws The contract shall govern if State and local environmental quality laws conflict with or preclude performance of contractual requirements.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!