Xxxxxxxx et al. Web Services Agreement Specification (WS-Agreement). Pro- posed Recommendation, Grid Resource Allocation Agreement Protocol Working Group, Open Grid Forum. September 2006.
Xxxxxxxx et al., The Majorana Neutrinoless Double-Beta Decay Experiment, IEEE Nucl. Sci. Symp. Conf. Rec. 2008 (2008) 1793–1798, [arXiv:0811.2446]. [32] XXXX and SuperNEMO Collaboration, H. Xxxxxx, SuperNEMO project, X.Phys.Conf.Ser. 120 (2008) 052054. [33] CUORE Collaboration, X. Xxxxxxxx, From Cuoricino to CUORE: Investigating the inverted hierarchy region of neutrino mass, J.Phys.Conf.Ser. 120 (2008) 052051. [34] X. Xxxxxxx et. al., Detection of very small neutrino masses in double-beta decay using laser tagging, Phys. Lett. B480 (2000) 12–18, [hep-ex/0002003]. [35] X. X. Xxxxxxxx and X. X. Xxxxx, Symmetries and generalisations of tri-bimaximal neutrino mixing, Phys. Lett. B535 (2002) 163–169, [hep-ph/0203209]. [36] Z.-z. Xing, Nearly tri-bimaximal neutrino mixing and CP violation, Phys. Lett. B533 (2002) 85–93, [hep-ph/0204049]. [37] X. X. Xxxxxxxx and X. X. Xxxxx, mu - tau reflection symmetry in lepton mixing and neutrino oscillations, Phys. Lett. B547 (2002) 219–228, [hep-ph/0210197]. [38] X. X. Xxxxxxxx and X. X. Xxxxx, Permutation symmetry, tri-bimaximal neutrino mixing and the S3 group characters, Phys. Lett. B557 (2003) 76, [hep-ph/0302025]. [Phys.Lett.B557:76-86,2003]. [39] X. X. Xxxxxxxx and X. X. Xxxxx, Status of tri- / bi-maximal neutrino mixing, hep-ph/0402006. [40] X. X. Xxxxxxxx and X. X. Xxxxx, The simplest neutrino mass matrix, Phys. Lett. B594 (2004) 324–332, [hep-ph/0403278].
Xxxxxxxx et al., C.A. No. 2020-0924-MTZ (Del. Ch.); or (iii) any claims of any person or entity that submits a request for exclusion from the Settlement Class that is accepted by the Court.
Xxxxxxxx et. Al., 2008; Xxxxxxx, 2013; Xxxxxxx et. al., 2013), but focusing on the type of geotechnical information that is expected to be relevant for monitoring the assets, and the practical and material constraints for an agency in implementing such technologies. Criteria were ultimately condensed in only 7 indicators, for compactness and simplicity. To make criteria comparable, we normalized some of the extensive characteristics (e.g. costs) to what we estimate would be its value over a common area. Following is a description of the criteria and a general discussion on how they were applied to the specific remote sensing technology options.
Xxxxxxxx et al, Case No. 4:11-cv-3229 filed in the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska;
Xxxxxxxx et al., Civ. Action No. 7629 (Del. Ch.); and Xxxxx Xxxxxx v. Xxxxx X.
Xxxxxxxx et al., Civ. Action No. 7647 (Del. Ch.).
