How much are the Device Payment Awards for Users Sample Clauses

How much are the Device Payment Awards for Users. If you are a User, you may be eligible for a Device Payment Award for each Recalled Device you purchased, leased, or rented. The amount of the award depends on the specific model of your Recalled Device: Recalled Device User Device Payment Award (Per Device) System One 50 Series ASV4 (Auto SV4) $469.14 System One 50 Series Base $69.14 System One 50 Series BiPAP $159.46 System One 60 Series ASV4 (Auto SV4) $424.32 System One 60 Series Base $68.24 System One 60 Series BiPAP $152.70 C-series S/T, AVAPS (C-series and C-series HT) $394.37 DreamStation CPAP $55.63 DreamStation ASV $379.50 DreamStation ST, AVAPS $329.05 DreamStation BiPAP $130.63 DreamStation Go $107.43 E30 $453.83 OmniLab Advanced Plus $165.99 Trilogy 100/200, Xxxxxx Plus, Aeris LifeVent $1,552.25 V30 auto $67.12 These awards are based on the relative pricing of the devices. For example, a basic CPAP machine (DreamStation CPAP) is less expensive than a full ventilator system (Trilogy 100/200), and the Device Payment Awards take that relative pricing into account. If more than one User makes a claim for a Device Payment Award with respect to the same Recalled Device (e.g., a rental Recalled Device), the Device Payment Award will be allocated by the Settlement Administrator among those Users on a pro rata basis after Claims Period Deadline. If a User returned their Recalled Device to Philips Respironics under warranty (outside of a Recall Program) and received another Recalled Device for free pursuant to that warranty, the User is only eligible for a Device Payment Award for the Recalled Device provided to the User for free under warranty, not the original Recalled Device returned to Philips Respironics under warranty. If a User returned his or her Recalled Device under warranty (outside of a Recall Program) and received his or her full payment back, the User is not eligible for a Device Payment Award for the Recalled Device the User returned. Please keep in mind that if you returned a Recalled Device to Philips Respironics and received a Remanufactured Device from Philips Respironics, your potential claim for Settlement benefits is for the Recalled Device, not the Remanufactured Device.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to How much are the Device Payment Awards for Users

  • System for Award Management (XXX) Requirement Alongside a signed copy of this Agreement, Grantee will provide Florida Housing with a XXX.xxx proof of registration and Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) number. Grantee will continue to maintain an active XXX registration with current information at all times during which it has an active award under this Agreement.

  • System for Award Management (XXX) XXX.gov)

  • Selection Criteria for Awarding Task Order The Government will award to the offeror whose proposal is deemed most advantageous to the Government based upon an integrated assessment using the evaluation criteria. The Government will evaluate proposals against established selection criteria specified in the task order RFP. Generally, the Government's award decision will be based on selection criteria which addresses past performance, technical acceptability, proposal risk and cost. Among other sources, evaluation of past performance may be based on past performance assessments provided by TO Program Managers on individual task orders performed throughout the life of the contract. The order of importance for the factors will be identified in the RFP for the specified task order.

  • Conditions for Award of Contract 7. The Borrower shall not award any Works contract which involves environmental impacts until:

  • Benchmarks for Measuring Accessibility For the purposes of this Agreement, the accessibility of online content and functionality will be measured according to the W3C’s Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 Level AA and the Web Accessibility Initiative Accessible Rich Internet Applications Suite (WAI-ARIA) 1.0 for web content, which are incorporated by reference. Adherence to these accessible technology standards is one way to ensure compliance with the College’s underlying legal obligations to ensure that people with disabilities are able to acquire the same information, engage in the same interactions, and enjoy the same benefits and services within the same timeframe as their nondisabled peers, with substantially equivalent ease of use; that they are not excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, or otherwise subjected to discrimination in any College programs, services, and activities delivered online, as required by Section 504 and the ADA and their implementing regulations; and that they receive effective communication of the College’s programs, services, and activities delivered online.

  • File Management and Record Retention relating to CRF Eligible Persons or Households Grantee must maintain a separate file for every applicant, Eligible Person, or Household, regardless of whether the request was approved or denied.

  • District’s Evaluation of Consultant and Consultant’s Employees and/or Subcontractors The District may evaluate the Consultant in any way the District is entitled pursuant to applicable law. The District’s evaluation may include, without limitation:

  • STATEWIDE ACHIEVEMENT TESTING When CONTRACTOR is an NPS, per implementation of Senate Bill 484, CONTRACTOR shall administer all Statewide assessments within the California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (“CAASP”), Desired Results Developmental Profile (“DRDP”), California Alternative Assessment (“CAA”), achievement and abilities tests (using LEA-authorized assessment instruments), the Fitness Gram with the exception of the English Language Proficiency Assessments for California (“ELPAC”) to be completed by the LEA, and as appropriate to the student, and mandated by XXX xxxxxxxx to LEA and state and federal guidelines. CONTRACTOR is subject to the alternative accountability system developed pursuant to Education Code section 52052, in the same manner as public schools. Each LEA student placed with CONTRACTOR by the LEA shall be tested by qualified staff of CONTRACTOR in accordance with that accountability program. XXX shall provide test administration training to CONTRACTOR’S qualified staff. CONTRACTOR shall attend LEA test training and comply with completion of all coding requirements as required by XXX.

  • Post-Award Small Business Program Re Representation If applicable, The Contractor shall report timely and accurately their small business program re-representation and update XXX.xxx.

  • RIGHT OF ALLOTTEE TO USE COMMON AREAS AND FACILITIES SUBJECT TO PAYMENT OF TOTAL MAINTENANCE CHARGES The Allottee hereby agrees to purchase the [Apartment/Plot] on the specific understanding that is/her right to the use of Common Areas shall be subject to timely payment of total maintenance charges, as determined and thereafter billed by the maintenance agency appointed or the association of allottees (or the maintenance agency appointed by it) and performance by the Allottee of all his/her obligations in respect of the terms and conditions specified by the maintenance agency or the association of allottees from time to time.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.