Impairment of Goodwill Sample Clauses

Impairment of Goodwill. The goodwill associated with or inherent in Seller’s trademarks (both registered and unregistered) has not been impaired.
Sample 1Sample 2See All (4)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Impairment of Goodwill. The goodwill associated with or inherent in the each TPT Corporation’s respective trademarks (both registered and unregistered) has not been impaired.
Sample 1Sample 2
Impairment of Goodwill. The goodwill associated with or inherent in D-Vasive’s trademarks (both registered and unregistered) has not been impaired.
Sample 1
Impairment of Goodwill. The goodwill associated with or inherent in AFI’s trademarks (both registered and unregistered) has not been impaired.
Sample 1
Impairment of Goodwill. The goodwill associated with or inherent in the each SyntheMed Corporation’s respective trademarks (both registered and unregistered) has not been impaired.
Sample 1
Impairment of Goodwill. The goodwill associated with or inherent in Demonsaw’s trademarks (both registered and unregistered) has not been impaired.
Sample 1
Impairment of Goodwill. At December 31, 2005 and 2004, Duke Energy had goodwill balances of $3,775 million and $4,148 million, respectively. Duke Energy evaluates the impairment of goodwill under SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” The majority of Duke Energy’s goodwill at December 31, 2005 relates to the acquisition of Westcoast in March 2002, whose assets were primarily included within the Natural Gas Transmission segment. The remainder relates to International Energy’s Latin American operations and Crescent. As of the acquisition date, Duke Energy allocates goodwill to a reporting unit, which Duke Energy defines as an operating segment or one level below an operating segment. As required by SFAS No. 142, Duke Energy performs an annual goodwill impairment test and updates the test if events or circumstances occur that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. Key assumptions used in the analysis include, but are not limited to, the use of an appropriate discount rate, estimated future cash flows and estimated run rates of operation, maintenance, and general and administrative costs. In estimating cash flows, Duke Energy incorporates expected growth rates, regulatory stability and ability to renew contracts as well as other factors into its revenue and expense forecasts. As a result of the 2005 impairment test required by SFAS No. 142, Duke Energy did not record any impairment on its goodwill. Had the discount rate used to determine fair value of the reporting units been 1% lower, there would still not have been any impairment recorded in 2005. In the third quarter of 2003, Duke Energy recorded a $254 million goodwill impairment charge to write off all of the goodwill related to the former XXXX operations, most of which related to certain aspects of the trading and marketing business, and was recorded as a component of continuing operations. This impairment charge reflected the reduction in scope and scale of DETM’s business and the continued deterioration of market conditions affecting merchant generation operations during 2003. Duke Energy used a discounted cash flow analysis utilizing the key assumptions described above to perform the analysis. Management continues to remain alert for any indicators that the fair value of a reporting unit could be below book value and will assess goodwill for impairment as appropriate. Unbilled and Estimated Revenues. Revenues on sales of electricity, primarily at U.S. Fr...
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Impairment of Goodwill

  • Procurement of Goods Part A: General Goods shall be procured in accordance with the provisions of Section I of the "Guidelines for Procurement under IBRD Loans and XXX Credits" published by the Bank in January 1995 and revised in January 1996 (the Guidelines) and the following provisions of this Section, as applicable. Part B: International Competitive Bidding

  • COUNTERFEIT GOODS Seller agrees that it will not furnish to Jeppesen Goods or separately-identifiable items or components of Goods that: (i) are an unauthorized copy or substitute of an “Original Equipment Manufacturer” or “Original Component Manufacturer” (collectively, “OEM”) item; (ii) are not traceable to an OEM sufficient to ensure authenticity in OEM design and manufacture; (iii) do not contain proper external or internal materials or components required by the OEM or are not constructed in accordance with OEM design; (iv) have been re- worked, re-marked, re-labeled, repaired, refurbished, or otherwise modified from OEM design but not disclosed as such or are represented as OEM authentic or new; or (v) have not passed successfully all OEM required testing, verification, screening, and quality control processes, (collectively “Counterfeit Goods”). Notwithstanding the foregoing, Goods or items that contain modifications, repairs, re-work, or re-marking as a result of Seller’s or its subcontractor’s design authority, material review procedures, quality control processes or parts management plans, and that have not been misrepresented or mismarked without legal right to do so, will not be deemed Counterfeit Goods. Counterfeit Goods will be deemed nonconforming for this PO under which they were delivered. Seller will implement and/or maintain an appropriate strategy to ensure that Goods furnished to Jeppesen under this PO are not Counterfeit Goods. Seller’s strategy will include, but is not limited to, the direct procurement of items from OEMs or authorized suppliers, conducting approved testing or inspection to ensure the authenticity of items, and, when items are to be procured from non-authorized suppliers, obtaining from such non-authorized suppliers appropriate certificates of conformance that provide one or more of the following: (i) the OEM’s original certificate of conformance for the item; (ii) sufficient records providing unbroken supply chain traceability to the OEM; or (iii) test and inspection records demonstrating the item’s authenticity. If Seller becomes aware or suspects that it has furnished Counterfeit Goods to Jeppesen under this PO, Seller promptly, but in no case later than thirty (30) days from discovery, will notify Jeppesen in writing and replace, at Seller’s expense, such Counterfeit Goods with OEM or Jeppesen- approved Goods that conform to the requirements of this PO. Seller will be liable for all costs related to the replacement of Counterfeit Goods, installation of authentic Goods, and any testing or validation necessitated by the installation of authentic Goods after the Counterfeit Goods have been replaced. Seller bears responsibility for procuring authentic Goods or items from its subcontractors and will ensure that all such subcontractors comply with the requirements of this Section.

  • Other Methods of Procurement of Goods and Works. The following table specifies the methods of procurement, other than International Competitive Bidding, which may be used for goods and works. The Procurement Plan shall specify the circumstances under which such methods may be used: (a) National Competitive Bidding (b) Shopping (c) Direct Contracting

  • Classification of Goods The classification of goods in trade between the Parties shall be in conformity with the Harmonized System.

  • Other Methods of Procurement of Goods and Works The following table specifies the methods of procurement, other than International Competitive Bidding, which may be used for goods and works. The Procurement Plan shall specify the circumstances under which such methods may be used: (a) National Competitive Bidding (b) Shopping (c) Direct Contracting

  • Procurement of Goods and Works Except as ADB may otherwise agree, Goods and Works shall only be procured on the basis of the methods of procurement set forth below:

  • Procurement of Goods and Services (a) If the HSP is subject to the procurement provisions of the BPSAA, the HSP will abide by all directives and guidelines issued by the Management Board of Cabinet that are applicable to the HSP pursuant to the BPSAA. (b) If the HSP is not subject to the procurement provisions of the BPSAA, the HSP will have a procurement policy in place that requires the acquisition of supplies, equipment or services valued at over $25,000 through a competitive process that ensures the best value for funds expended. If the HSP acquires supplies, equipment or services with the Funding it will do so through a process that is consistent with this policy.

  • Particular Methods of Procurement of Goods Works and Services (other than Consultants’ Services)

  • Particular Methods of Procurement of Goods and Works International Competitive Bidding. Goods and works shall be procured under contracts awarded on the basis of International Competitive Bidding.

  • Release of Goods 1. Each Party shall adopt or maintain simplified customs procedures for the efficient release of goods in order to facilitate trade between the Parties. 2. Pursuant to paragraph 1, each Party shall adopt or maintain procedures that: (a) provide for the immediate release of goods upon receipt of the customs declaration and fulfillment of all applicable requirements and procedures; (b) provide for the electronic submission and processing of documentation and data, including manifests, in advance of the arrival of the goods in order to expedite the release of goods from customs control upon arrival; (c) allow goods to be released at the point of arrival without requiring temporary transfer to warehouses or other facilities; and (d) require that the importer be informed if a Party does not promptly release goods, including, to the extent permitted by its law, the reasons why the goods are not released and which border agency, if not the customs administration, has withheld release of the goods. 3. Each Party shall adopt or maintain procedures that provide for the release of goods prior to a final determination and payment of any customs duties, taxes, fees, and charges imposed on or in connection with importation of the goods, when these are not determined prior to or promptly upon arrival, provided that the goods are otherwise eligible for release and any security required by the importing Party has been provided. 4. If a Party allows for the release of goods conditioned ona security, it shall adopt or maintain procedures that: (a) ensure that the amount of the security is no greater than that required to ensure that obligations arising from the importation of the goods will be fulfilled; (b) ensure that the security shall be discharged as soon as possible after its customs administration is satisfied that the obligations arising from the importation of the goods have been fulfilled or, for instruments covering multiple entries, until it is no longer required by the customs administration; and (c) allow an importer to provide security using a non-cash financial instrument, including, if applicable, when an importer frequently enters goods, an instrument covering multiple entries. 5. Nothing in this Article requires a Party to release a good if its requirements for release have not been met nor prevents a Party from liquidating a security in accordance with its law. 6. Each Party shall allow, to the extent practicable, goods intended for import to be moved within its territory under customs control from the point of entry into the Party's territory to another customs office in its territory from where the goods are intended to be released, provided the applicable regulatory requirements are met.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!