Inability to Perform Annual Inspection Sample Clauses

Inability to Perform Annual Inspection a) In the event the technician arrives onsite and is refused access to perform the annual service, the Owner will be charged the annual service fee, the contract will be terminated and the Owner/Biofilter service site will be reported to the local Chief Building Official, in accordance with the Ontario Building Code section 8.9.2.3.(3)(b).
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Inability to Perform Annual Inspection

  • Inability to Perform This Lease and the obligations of the Tenant hereunder shall not be affected or impaired because the Landlord is unable to fulfill any of its obligations hereunder or is delayed in doing so, if such inability or delay is caused by reason of strike, labor troubles, acts of God, or any other cause beyond the reasonable control of the Landlord.

  • WARRANTY OF CONTRACTOR’S ABILITY TO PERFORM The Contractor warrants that, to the best of its knowledge, there is no pending or threatened action, proceeding, or investigation, or any other legal or financial condition, that would in any way prohibit, restrain, or diminish the Contractor’s ability to satisfy its Contract obligations. The Contractor warrants that neither it nor any affiliate is currently on the Suspended Vendor List, Convicted Vendor List, or the Discriminatory Vendor List, or on any similar list maintained by any other state or the federal government. The Contractor shall immediately notify the Department in writing if its ability to perform is compromised in any manner during the term of the Contract. Information Technology Staff Augmentation Services Contract No. 80101507-21-STC-ITSA Contract Exhibit F Resume Self-Certification Form Contractor’s candidates shall complete this Resume Self-Certification Form. Completed Resume Self-Certification Forms shall be submitted within the Contractor’s response to Customer’s requests for quote. “I the undersigned do hereby certify, under the penalty of perjury, that information in my resume submitted for consideration of the State of Florida contract position is true, correct, complete, and made in good faith to the best of my knowledge and belief. If an omission, falsification, misstatement, or misrepresentation has been made regarding my education, work ability, experience, employment history, and/or fitness for employment as a contractor, I may be disqualified as a contractor, and the matter will be reported to appropriate agency or law enforcement personnel. I understand that there may be civil and/or criminal penalties for misrepresenting pertinent information in connection with contract positions, including, but not limited to, penalties available under sections 287.133 or 817.566, Florida Statutes. I further understand that if I am not a United States citizen, violation cases may be reported to the US Department of Homeland Security for potential deportation.” “In addition, I the undersigned do hereby consent to the release of my information by employers, educational institutions, law enforcement agencies, and other individuals and organizations to investigators and other authorized agents of Florida for verification and investigation purposes. I understand that any documents submitted to procure a contract(s) with the State of Florida, including resumes, are public records.” Print Full Legal Name of Candidate Candidate’s Signature Date Candidate’s Form of Identification Presented Identification number Contractor’s Witness Signature One Date Contractor’s Witness Signature Two Date Print Name Contractor’s Witness One Print Name Contractor’s Witness Two Information Technology Staff Augmentation Services Contract No. 80101507-21-STC-ITSA Contract Exhibit G Contractor Selection Justification Form Customers shall complete this Contractor Selection Justification Form for each candidate selected and attach all completed forms to the purchase order. Date: Contractor’s Name: _ Contractor’s Contact Information: Candidate’s Name: Address: _ Phone: _ Email: _ Date Candidate will be available: _ Hourly rate of candidate: $ Position candidate recommended for: _ Justification for selection of candidate: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Agency: Division/Section/Unit: _ Printed Name: _ Title: _ Signature _ Date: Information Technology Staff Augmentation Services Contract No. 80101507-21-STC-ITSA Contract Exhibit H Contractor Performance Survey Note: This is an example of the questions contained in the Contractor Performance Survey. The actual survey will be provided in electronic form. Customers shall complete this Contractor Performance Survey for each Contractor on a quarterly basis. Customers will electronically submit the completed Contractor Performance Survey(s) to the Department Contract Manager no later than the due date indicated the Scope of Work. Contractor's Name: Quarter: Purchase Order (PO) Number: PO Total $ Amount: PO Starting Date Ending Date Please review the attached Rating Definitions and provide your opinion by rating the following: Quality of Service

  • Ability to Perform The Servicer does not believe, nor does it have any reason or cause to believe, that it cannot perform each and every covenant contained in this Agreement;

  • Warranty of Ability to Perform The Contractor warrants that, to the best of its knowledge, there is no pending or threatened action, proceeding, or investigation, or any other legal or financial condition, that would in any way prohibit, restrain, or diminish the Contractor’s ability to satisfy its Contract obligations. The Contractor warrants that neither it nor any affiliate is currently on the convicted vendor list maintained pursuant to section 287.133 of the Florida Statutes, or on any similar list maintained by any other state or the federal government. The Contractor shall immediately notify the Customer in writing if its ability to perform is compromised in any manner during the term of the Contract.

  • Authorization to Perform Services The Consultant is not authorized to perform any services or incur any costs whatsoever under the terms of this Agreement until receipt of a written Notice to Proceed from the City.

  • Extended Illness Sick leave for extended illness (5 or more days) will be paid only during the time period in which a physician certifies the employee to be physically or mentally disabled, and only to the extent of the number of days accumulated.

  • Termination of Contractor’s Responsibilities This Agreement will be considered complete when all work has been completed and accepted by the COUNTY and all warranty periods have expired. The CONTRACTOR will then be released from further obligation except as set forth in this Agreement.

  • Reasonable Suspicion Testing The Employer may, but does not have a legal duty to, request or require an employee to undergo drug and alcohol testing if the Employer or any supervisor of the employee has a reasonable suspicion (a belief based on specific facts and rational inferences drawn from those facts) related to the performance of the job that the employee:

  • Requester and Approved User Responsibilities The Requester agrees through the submission of the DAR that the PI named has reviewed and understands the principles for responsible research use and data management of the genomic datasets as defined in the NIH Security Best Practices for Controlled-Access Data Subject to the GDS Policy. The Requester and Approved Users further acknowledge that they are responsible for ensuring that all uses of the data are consistent with national, tribal, and state laws and regulations, as appropriate, as well as relevant institutional policies and procedures for managing sensitive genomic and phenotypic data. The Requester certifies that the PI is in good standing (i.e., no known sanctions) with the institution, relevant funding agencies, and regulatory agencies and is eligible to conduct independent research (i.e., is not a postdoctoral fellow, student, or trainee). The Requester and any Approved Users may use the dataset(s) only in accordance with the parameters described on the study page and in the 1 If contractor services are to be utilized, PI requesting the data must provide a brief description of the services that the contractor will perform for the PI (e.g., data cleaning services) in the research use statement of the DAR. Additionally, the Key Personnel section of the DAR must include the name of the contractor’s employee(s) who will conduct the work. These requirements apply whether the contractor carries out the work at the PI’s facility or at the contractor’s facility. In addition, the PI is expected to include in any contract agreement requirements to ensure that any of the contractor’s employees who have access to the data adhere to the NIH GDS Policy, this Data Use Certification Agreement, and the NIH Security Best Practices for Controlled-Access Data Subject to the GDS Policy. Note that any scientific collaborators, including contractors, who are not at the Requester must submit their own DAR. Addendum to this Agreement for the appropriate research use, as well as any limitations on such use, of the dataset(s), as described in the DAR, and as required by law. Through the submission of this DAR, the Requester and Approved Users acknowledge receiving and reviewing a copy of the Addendum which includes Data Use Limitation(s) for each dataset requested. The Requester and Approved Users agree to comply with the terms listed in the Addendum. Through submission of the DAR, the PI and Requester agree to submit a Project Renewal or Project Close-out prior to the expiration date of the one (1) year data access period. The PI also agrees to submit an annual Progress Update prior to the one (1) year anniversary2 of the project, as described under Research Use Reporting (Term 10) below. By approving and submitting the attached DAR, the Institutional Signing Official provides assurance that relevant institutional policies and applicable local, state, tribal, and federal laws and regulations, as applicable, have been followed, including IRB approval, if required. Approved Users may be required to have IRB approval if they have access to personal identifying information for research participants in the original study at their institution, or through their collaborators. The Institutional Signing Official also assures, through the approval of the DAR, that other institutional departments with relevant authorities (e.g., those overseeing human subjects research, information technology, technology transfer) have reviewed the relevant sections of the NIH GDS Policy and the associated procedures and are in agreement with the principles defined. The Requester acknowledges that controlled-access datasets subject to the NIH GDS Policy may be updated to exclude or include additional information. Unless otherwise indicated, all statements herein are presumed to be true and applicable to the access and use of all versions of these datasets.

  • Reasonable Cause Testing Reasonable cause for testing is a belief that an employee is under the influence of a drug and/or alcohol based on specific facts and/or reasonable inferences derived from those facts. An observing supervisor shall describe and document the following: -Specific observations concerning the appearance, behavior, speech or performance of the employee; and/or -Violation of safety rule or other unsafe work incident which, after investigation, leads the supervisor(s) to believe that drug and/or alcohol use may be a contributing factor; and/or -Other physical, circumstantial or immediate indicators of drug and/or alcohol use.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.