Internal Evaluation and Quality Assessment Mechanisms Sample Clauses

Internal Evaluation and Quality Assessment Mechanisms. Quality assurance and evaluation in the EUSA_ID partnership refers to different levels such as the performance of grantees, the performance of partner programmes, the performance in terms of general services offered to applicants and grantees and the consortium performance: • The performance of grantees will be monitored by referring to regular progress reports signed by the student and the hosting institution and supplemented by a semester transcript. These documents have to be submitted to the home institution and the coordinator. Hosting institutions also conduct feedback meetings with grantees once a semester. • Performance of partner programmes will be monitored by referring to existing evaluation instruments at partner HEIs such as standardized course evaluation questionnaires which are widely used in Master programmes represented in EUSA_ID. As use of partner specific evaluation instruments is limited by obligations to maintain confidentiality a feedback questionnaire for grantees will be developed which shall be submitted together with progress reports. To ensure confidentiality a grantees representative will be designated to collect questionnaires and forward them to the coordinators. The questionnaire will not only focus on academic aspects like course offers and supervision procedures but also on other performance indicators related to general services offered to applicants and grantees. • Performance in terms of general services offered to applicants and grantees will be part of the feedback meetings with grantees and included in the questionnaire. Items to be considered include the quality of information provided during the application phase, the quality of counselling services during the application phase, the quality of preparatory and supporting services before the start of the mobility period, the quality of services offered for integration at the hosting institution, and the quality of non-academic services during the mobility period
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Internal Evaluation and Quality Assessment Mechanisms

  • SMHS Governance, Safety and Quality Requirements 4.1 Participates in the maintenance of a safe work environment.

  • Project Monitoring Reporting and Evaluation The Recipient shall furnish to the Association each Project Report not later than forty-five (45) days after the end of each calendar semester, covering the calendar semester.

  • NMHS Governance, Safety and Quality Requirements 3.1 Participates in the maintenance of a safe work environment.

  • EMHS Governance, Safety and Quality Requirements 4.1 Participates in the maintenance of a safe work environment.

  • STANDARDS AND QUALITY The Supplier shall at all times during the Contract Period ensure that the Services are delivered in accordance with: the Digital Service Design Manual (and the Supplier shall comply with the processes and procedures set out therein); the Standards; the KPIs; the Methodology; the applicable SOW; and all other applicable provisions of this Contract.

  • REPORTING AND EVALUATION The Provider agrees to comply with 7 AAC 81.120, Confidentiality and 7 AAC 81.150, Reports, and other applicable state or federal law regarding the submission of information, including the provisions of Section VI of this Agreement. The Provider agrees to submit any reporting information required under this Agreement and to make available information deemed necessary by DHSS to evaluate the efficacy of service delivery or compliance with applicable state or federal statutes or regulations. The Provider agrees to provide state officials and their representatives access to facilities, systems, books and records, for the purpose of monitoring compliance with this Agreement and evaluating services provided under this Agreement. On-site Quality Assurance Reviews may be conducted by DHSS staff to ensure compliance with service protocols. The Provider will ensure that DHSS staff has access to program files for the purposes of follow-up, quality assurance monitoring and fiscal administration of the program.

  • Evaluation, Testing, and Monitoring 1. The System Agency may review, test, evaluate and monitor Grantee’s Products and services, as well as associated documentation and technical support for compliance with the Accessibility Standards. Review, testing, evaluation and monitoring may be conducted before and after the award of a contract. Testing and monitoring may include user acceptance testing. Neither the review, testing (including acceptance testing), evaluation or monitoring of any Product or service, nor the absence of review, testing, evaluation or monitoring, will result in a waiver of the State’s right to contest the Grantee’s assertion of compliance with the Accessibility Standards.

  • Program Monitoring and Evaluation (c) The Recipient shall prepare, or cause to be prepared, and furnish to the Association not later than six months after the Closing Date, a report of such scope and in such detail as the Association shall reasonably request, on the execution of the Program, the performance by the Recipient and the Association of their respective obligations under the Legal Agreements and the accomplishment of the purposes of the Financing.”

  • Project Monitoring Reporting Evaluation A. The Project Implementing Entity shall monitor and evaluate the progress of its activities under the Project and prepare Project Reports in accordance with the provisions of Section 5.08(b) of the General Conditions and on the basis of indicators agreed with the Bank. Each such report shall cover the period of one

  • Monitoring and Adjusting Forecasts Verizon will, for ninety (90) days, monitor traffic on each trunk group that it establishes at ECI’s suggestion or request pursuant to the procedures identified in Section 14.2 of this Attachment. At the end of such ninety-(90) day period, Verizon may disconnect trunks that, based on reasonable engineering criteria and capacity constraints, are not warranted by the actual traffic volume experienced. If, after such initial ninety (90) day period for a trunk group, Verizon determines that any trunks in the trunk group in excess of two (2) DS1s are not warranted by actual traffic volumes (considering engineering criteria for busy Centium Call Second (Hundred Call Second) and blocking percentages), then Verizon may hold ECI financially responsible for the excess facilities and disconnect such excess facilities.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.