Monitoring and Evaluation a. The AGENCY shall expeditiously provide to the COUNTY upon request, all data needed for the purpose of monitoring, evaluating and/or auditing the program(s). This data shall include, but not be limited to, clients served, services provided, outcomes achieved, information on materials and services delivered, and any other data required, in the sole discretion of the COUNTY, that may be required to adequately monitor and evaluate the services provided under this Contract. Monitoring shall be performed in accordance with COUNTY’S established Noncompliance Standards, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Attachment “C”.
b. The AGENCY agrees to permit persons duly authorized by the COUNTY to interview any clients and all current and/or former employees of the AGENCY to be assured of the AGENCY’S satisfactory performance of the terms of this Contract.
c. Following such evaluation, monitoring, and/or audit, the COUNTY will deliver a report of its findings and recommendations with regard to the AGENCY’S conformance with this Contract’s terms and conditions to the AGENCY and/or Board of Directors’ President, and members, whenever applicable. If deficiencies are noted, a written notice of corrective action will be issued to the AGENCY which will specify deficiencies and provide a timeline for correction of those deficiencies. Within the designated timeframe in the written notice of corrective action, the AGENCY shall submit to the COUNTY’S CCC manager (“Manager”), or their designee, a corrective action plan to rectify all deficiencies identified by the COUNTY.
d. Failure by the AGENCY to correct noted deficiencies, as outlined in the written notice of corrective action, may result in the AGENCY being deemed in breach of the Contract terms.
e. The AGENCY shall cooperate with the COUNTY on all reviews to ensure compliance with all applicable COUNTY guidelines and requirements for general fund recipients.
Monitoring and Evaluation. 1. GRANTEE agrees to cooperate with CITY on the implementation, monitoring and evaluation of this Program and to comply with any and all reporting, data collection, and evaluation requirements established by CITY, including but not limited to; submission of reports as outlined in this AGREEMENT.
Monitoring and Evaluation. The City shall have the right to monitor and evaluate the progress and performance of the Subrecipient to assure that the terms of this Agreement are being satisfactorily fulfilled in accordance with City’s and other applicable monitoring and evaluation criteria and standards. The City shall at least quarterly review the Subrecipient’s performance using on-site visits, progress reports required to be submitted by the Subrecipient, audit findings, disbursements transactions and contact with the Subrecipient as necessary. The Subrecipient shall furnish to the City quarterly program and financial reports of its activities in such form and manner as may be requested by the City. Subrecipients shall fully cooperate with City in relation to such monitoring and evaluation.
Monitoring and Evaluation. 14.1 The CGIAR’s M&E Framework is intended to support successful execution of the SRF and translate the CGIAR’s vision into tangible results.
14.2 Under the CGIAR’s M&E Framework, including as may be specified as part of the Common Operational Framework, periodic objective assessments are expected to be conducted on the extent to which CRPs and other aspects of the CGIAR are likely to or have achieved their stated objectives, as articulated in the SRF, the CGIAR Principles and the Joint Declaration.
14.3 Fund Donors are, to the extent not otherwise required by their respective statutory, regulatory or policy environments, expected to manage their monitoring and evaluation needs and responsibilities with respect to the CGIAR Fund and their Bilateral Funding, if any, collectively through the Common Operational Framework, thereby refraining from additional, duplicative evaluations.
14.4 The Fund Council monitors the performance of its support units, including the Trustee, Fund Office and ISPC. Such performance is monitored in the following four areas of accountability, as relevant: (i) strategic impact, (ii) quality and relevance of programmatic performance, (iii) managerial and governance performance, and (iv) financial performance and resource mobilization.
Monitoring and Evaluation. A. Authorized State representatives shall have the right to monitor and evaluate the Contractor’s administrative, fiscal and program performance pursuant to this Agreement. Said monitoring and evaluation may include, but is not limited to, administrative processes, fiscal, data and procurement components. This will include policies, procedures, procurement, audits, inspections of project premises, interviews of project staff and participants, and when applicable, inspection of food preparation sites.
B. The Contractor shall cooperate with the State in the monitoring and evaluation processes, which include making any administrative, program and fiscal staff available during any scheduled process.
C. The Contractor shall monitor contracts and subcontracts to ensure compliance with laws, regulations, and the provisions of contracts that may have a direct and/or material effect on each of its CDA funded programs.
D. The Contractor is responsible for maintaining supporting documentation including financial and statistical records, contracts, subcontracts, monitoring reports, and all other pertinent records until an audit has occurred and an audit resolution has been issued or unless otherwise authorized in writing by CDA.
Monitoring and Evaluation. The Recipient and/or its designee under this Agreement shall participate with Provider to monitor the delivery of services under this Agreement and further to coordinate any service or program evaluation that may be necessary during or at the conclusion of the term of this Agreement.
Monitoring and Evaluation. The Authority will supervise the progress of the Project throughout the grant funding period and reserves the right to: carry out Evaluation Visits at a time agreed with the Grantee and after giving reasonable notice; and/or to appoint an external evaluator.
Monitoring and Evaluation. The City reserves the right to monitor and evaluate the progress and performance of Contractor to ensure that the terms of this Agreement are being satisfactorily met in accordance with the City’s and other applicable monitoring and evaluating criteria and standards. Contractor will cooperate with the City relating to such monitoring and evaluation.
Monitoring and Evaluation. 4.4.1 Grantee agrees that the City or its designee may carry out monitoring and evaluation activities to ensure adherence by the Grantee and Subgrantees to the Program Work Statement, Program Performance Measures, and Program Budget, as well as other provisions of this Agreement. Grantee shall fully cooperate in any monitoring or review by the City and further agrees to designate a staff member to coordinate monitoring and evaluation activities.
4.4.2 The City expressly reserves the right to monitor client-level data related to services provided under this Agreement. If the Grantee asserts that client-level data is legally protected from disclosure to the City, a specific and valid legal reference to this assertion must be provided and is subject to acceptance by the City’s Law Department.
4.4.3 Grantee shall provide the City with copies of all evaluation or monitoring reports received from other funding sources during the Agreement Term upon request following the receipt of the final report.
4.4.4 Grantee shall keep on file copies of all notices of Board of Directors meetings, Subcommittee or Advisory Board meetings, and copies of approved minutes of those meetings.
Monitoring and Evaluation. 14.1 Progress in delivering widening participation strategy is monitored by the University’s Education Committee, chaired by the Pro Vice-Chancellor (Education and Students) and including Students’ Union representation.
14.2 In addition, the Education Committee (through its Student Recruitment Committee – also chaired by the Pro Vice-Chancellor Education, with a membership which includes admissions and widening participation expertise as well as Students’ Union representation) will require each of the University’s faculties and relevant Professional Services divisions to submit, and report against, an annual action plan, containing detailed actions supporting delivery of the Widening Participation Strategy.
14.3 Operational responsibility for delivery and monitoring rests with the Widening Participation and UK Student Recruitment team, reporting to the Director of Student Recruitment, Access and Admissions. This team conducts a detailed annual review of progress against access agreement commitments, reporting key conclusions, achievements or concerns to the Student Recruitment Committee, which is accountable to Education Committee for overseeing compliance and monitoring progress against OFFA-related targets.
14.4 Strategy development is routinely informed by research commissioned from the University’s Widening Participation Research Cluster. For example, our contextualised approach to selection, which has led to a lower offer to any applicant from a low performing school, was developed as a result of research conducted by the Research Cluster. This indicated a correlation between A-Level attainment, low school performance and student success on undergraduate programmes at the University.
14.5 Recent Research Cluster projects include an analysis of the impact of the University’s student finance package on our ability to attract and retain a diverse student community. This research informed the University’s decision to strategically rebalance funds away from bursaries and towards outreach19.
14.6 We are also funding studies conducted by leading academic researchers into: efficacy of our widening participation progress measures; the impact of prior educational attainment and other relevant student background factors on the progress and retention of disadvantaged students at the University; the role which self-identification and aspiration play in the university application decision-making process; fostering a culture of belonging amongst widening participati...
