Interpretation of Article 6. With respect to paragraph 1 of Article 6 of the Agreement, the term “in accordance with its domestic laws” refers to procedural matters to facilitate the entry of the representatives of a Contracting Party to the territory of the other Contracting Party for the purposes provided in Article 6.
Interpretation of Article 6. The provisions of Sections 2 and 3 of this Article 6 shall not apply to the responsibility or liability of a director or officer, as such, pursuant to any criminal statute or for the payment of taxes pursuant to local, state or federal law. The provisions of this Article 6 have been adopted pursuant to the authority of sections 204A(10) and 801 of the Pennsylvania Business Corporation Law, shall be deemed to be a contract with each director or officer of the Corporation who serves as such at any time while this Article is in effect, and such provisions are cumulative of and shall be in addition to and independent of any and all other limitations on the liabilities of directors or officers of the Corporation, as such, or rights of indemnification by the Corporation to which a director or officer of the Corporation may be entitled, whether such limitations or rights arise under or are created by any statute, rule of law, Bylaw, agreement, vote of shareholders or disinterested directors or otherwise. Each person who serves as a director or officer of the Corporation while this Article 6 is in effect shall be deemed to be doing so in reliance on the provisions of this Article. No amendment to or repeal of this Article 6, nor the adoption of any provision of these Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation inconsistent with this Article 6, shall apply to or have any effect on, the liability or alleged liability of any director or officer of the Corporation for or with respect to any acts or omissions of such director or officer occurring prior to such amendment, repeal or adoption of an inconsistent provision. In any action, suit or proceeding involving the application of the provisions of this Article 6, the party or parties challenging the right of a director or officer to the benefits of this Article 6 shall have the burden of proof.
