INVESTIGATION AND FINDINGS. The Superintendent or designee, shall notify the employee of a pending investigation. Upon request of an employee or his/her representative, prior to taking action to suspend, dismiss an employee, or reduce his/her salary, the Superintendent, or designee, will meet with the employee to discuss the situation and consider any evidence or information the employee may wish to provide.
INVESTIGATION AND FINDINGS. The United States Attorney’s Office for the Western District of Washington (“U.S. Attorney’s Office”) is authorized to investigate alleged violations of Title III of the ADA. 28 C.F.R. § 36.502. It has the authority to, where appropriate, negotiate voluntary settlements, and to bring civil actions enforcing Title III of the ADA should the terms of the settlement be breached. 28 C.F.R. § 36.503 Complainant and her Companion are both Deaf and as such, are individuals with a “disability” within the meaning of the ADA. 42 U.S.C. § 12102; 28 C.F.R. § 36.104. Overlake Medical Center is a “public accommodation” within the meaning of Title III of the ADA, 42 U.S.C. § 12181(7)(F) and its implementing regulations, 28 C.F.R. § 36.104, as it operates Overlake Medical Center, a place of public accommodation. The ADA prohibits public accommodations, including hospitals, from discriminating on the basis of disability in the full and equal enjoyment of their goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages or accommodations. 42 U.S.C. § 12182(a); 28 C.F.R. § 36.201(a). Discrimination includes failing to take such steps as necessary to ensure that no individual with a disability is excluded, denied services, segregated, or otherwise treated differently than any other individual because of the absence of auxiliary aids and services. 42 U.S.C. § 12182(b)(2)(A)(iii); 28 C.F.R. § 36.
INVESTIGATION AND FINDINGS. The United States Attorney for the Northern District of Georgia (“United States Attorney”) is authorized under 42 U.S.C. § 12133 and 28 C.F.R. Part 35, Subpart F, to investigate the allegations of the complaint in this matter to determine DeKalb Regional’s compliance with Title II of the ADA. It has the authority to bring civil actions enforcing Title II of the ADA. Complainant is an individual with a “disability” within the meaning of the ADA. 42 U.S.C. § 12102(2); 28 C.F.R. § 35.
INVESTIGATION AND FINDINGS. The United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia (“United States Attorney”) is authorized to investigate alleged violations of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, as amended (“ADA”). 42 U.S.C. § 12188(b); 28 C.F.R. §§ 36.502, 36.503. It has the authority to, where appropriate, negotiate voluntary settlements, and to bring civil actions enforcing Title III of the ADA should the terms of the settlement be breached. Complainants X.X. and N.C. are deaf and as such, are individuals with a “disability” within the meaning of the ADA. 42 U.S.C. § 12102; 28 C.F.R. § 36.104. Complainant D.L. is Complainants’ adult son and as such has a known relationship or association with an individual with a disability. 42 U.S.C. § 12182(b)(1)(E); 28 C.F.R. § 36.
INVESTIGATION AND FINDINGS. The United States Department of Justice ("Department") and the U.S. Attorney for the District of Minnesota ("U.S. Attorney") are authorized under 28 C.F.R. Part 35, Subpart F, to investigate the allegations of the complaint in this matter to determine SMDC's compliance with Title III of the ADA. It has the authority to issue findings, and, where appropriate, negotiate and secure voluntary compliance agreements. Furthermore, the Department and U.S. Attorney are authorized under 42 U.S.C. § 12133 to bring civil actions enforcing Title III of the ADA should they fail to secure voluntary compliance pursuant to Subpart F. Pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 363A.28, subd. 6, the MDHR conducted an investigation into the allegations in [redacted]'s charge of discrimination. Under Minn. Stat. § 363A.28, subd. 8, the MHRA has the authority and obligation to endeavor to eliminate the unfair discriminatory practices through education, conciliation, and voluntary settlement agreements. Furthermore, the MDHR is authorized under Minn. Stat. §§363A. 28, subd. 6; 363A. 29; and 363A.33 to begin an administrative proceeding or a civil action to enforce the MHRA in if efforts to obtain voluntary compliance are unsuccessful. SMDC is a private, non-profit corporation and the corporate parent of non-profit corporations that own and operate two acute care hospitals licensed by the State of Minnesota. SMDC operates facilities that are "public accommodations" within the meaning Title III of the ADA, 42U.S.C. § 12181(7)(F), and it's implementing regulation at 28 C.F.R. § 36. 104. SMDC owns and operates "places of public accommodation" within the meaning of the MHRA, Minn. Stat. §363A.03, subd. 34. Following its investigation, the United States determined that SMDC failed to provide effective communication to the [redacted]s on May 10, 2004. The MDHR completed its separate investigation and concluded that there was probable cause to believe that an unfair discriminatory practice was committed during the hospitalization of [redacted]. Specifically, the United States and the MDHR concluded that SMDC failed to provide a sign language interpreter to the [redacted]s on May 10, 2004, in order to convey important discharge and post-surgery care instructions. In addition, the United States and the MDHR determined that SMOC lacked an effective protocol for obtaining interpreters for scheduled surgeries. Although SMDC disputes these findings and [redacted]'s allegations, SMDC agrees to resolve this mat...
INVESTIGATION AND FINDINGS. 15 The Superintendent or designee, shall notify the employee of a pending 18 Superintendent, or designee, will meet with the employee to discuss the 19 situation and consider any evidence or information the employee may wish to 20 provide. 21 Article 26 • Discipline 67
INVESTIGATION AND FINDINGS. The U.S. Attorney’s Office is authorized under 42 U.S.C. § 12188 and 28 C.F.R. Part 36, Subpart E, to investigate the allegations of the complaint to determine Briarleaf’s compliance with title III of the ADA. The U.S. Attorney’s Office has the authority to, where appropriate, negotiate and secure voluntary compliance agreements such as this Agreement, and to bring civil actions enforcing title III of the ADA should it fail to secure voluntary compliance.
INVESTIGATION AND FINDINGS. The United States Department of Justice ("Department") and the U.S. Attorney for the District of Minnesota ("U.S. Attorney") are authorized under 28 C.F.R. Part 35, Subpart F, to investigate the allegations of the complaint in this matter to determine HealthEast's compliance with Title III of the ADA. It has the authority to issue findings, and, where appropriate, negotiate and secure voluntary compliance agreements. Furthermore, the Department and U.S. Attorney are authorized under 42 U.S.C. § 12133 to bring civil actions enforcing Title III of the ADA should they fail to secure voluntary compliance pursuant to Subpart F.
INVESTIGATION AND FINDINGS. This matter was initiated by a complaint filed with the United States against the Detroit Public Schools, alleging violations of title II of the ADA, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12131-12134, and its implementing regulation, 28 C.F.R. Part 35. The Complainant, who is deaf, is the parent of a child who was a student at the School District's Early Childhood Intervention Program during the 2011-2013 school years. This program provides family-centered early intervention services for infants and toddlers with developmental delays. Parental involvement is a key component of the program. The Complainant alleged that the School District denied her effective communication by refusing to provide her with a sign language interpreter at either the home or center-based teaching sessions, so that she could actively participate in the education of her child. Complainant is deaf and relies upon American Sign Language as her primary means of communication. Complainant is a qualified individual with a disability within the meaning of the ADA. 00 X.X.X. §00000; 00 X.X.X. §00.000. Xxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxx is authorized, under 28 C.F.R. Part 35, Subpart F, to investigate the allegations of the complaint in this matter to determine the School District's compliance with Title II of the ADA and the Title II implementing regulation at 28 C.F.R.
INVESTIGATION AND FINDINGS. The United States Department of Justice (the “Department”) and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of Illinois (“U.S. Attorney’s Office”) are authorized to investigate alleged violations of Title III of the ADA, to use alternative means of dispute resolution, where appropriate, including settlement negotiations to resolve disputes, and to bring a civil action in federal court in any case that involves a pattern or practice of discrimination or that raises an issue of general public importance. 42 U.S.C. §§ 12188(b), 12212; 28 C.F.R. §§ 36.502, 36.503, 36.506.
