Jostens Lawsuit Sample Clauses

Jostens Lawsuit. 44 ARTICLE XIII TERMINATION..................................................... 45 13.1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Jostens Lawsuit. Regarding the Legal Proceeding styled Taylor Publishing Co. v. Jostens, Inc. No. 4:97 CV 11 in the United Xxxxxx District Court for the Eastern District of Texas and No. 99-40154 in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (collectively, the "Jostens Lawsuit"), each of Buyer and TPC acknowledge that Seller is currently paying expenses and fees associated with the proceeding of the Jostens Lawsuit before the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. After the Closing Date, Seller will continue to pay and be fully responsible for any fees and expenses incurred after the Closing Date that are associated with the prosecution of the Jostens Lawsuit and will indemnify and hold the Company harmless from any Losses arising out of, based upon, attributable to or resulting from the Jostens Lawsuit. Each of Buyer and TPC agree to make available to Seller upon prior written request (i) any of the Company's personnel whose assistance or participation is reasonably required by Seller and (ii) those Books and Records which are reasonably required by Seller for the prosecution of the Jostens Lawsuit and all future proceedings relating to the Jostens Lawsuit, including providing documents, witnesses, reasonable access to management and other assistance; provided, however, that any such assistance or participation by such personnel or availability of such Books and Records does not unduly interfere with the normal conduct of the Company's business. Seller shall pay to Company a per diem charge at the rate of $500 per 8-hour day (prorated for partial days to the nearest quarter of a day) for each of the Company's personnel required to assist Seller pursuant to this Section 12.7 and shall reimburse the Company for any reasonable documented out-of-pocket expenses, including travel and other related expenses, as and when incurred by the Company or such personnel pursuant to this Section 12.7 to the extent such expenses are not paid directly by Seller. TPC hereby grants and assigns to Seller an undivided interest in any proceeds actually collected from the Jostens Lawsuit and each of Buyer, TPC and Seller agree that proceeds actually collected in relation to the Jostens Lawsuit will be allocated as follows: (i) TPC is entitled to an amount equal to 10% of the amount actually collected pursuant to the Jostens Lawsuit (net of fees and expenses of the Jostens Lawsuit that have been incurred directly by Seller, including legal fees); provided, however, th...

Related to Jostens Lawsuit

  • Investigations; Litigation There is no investigation or review pending (or, to the knowledge of Parent, threatened) by any Governmental Entity with respect to Parent or any of its Subsidiaries which would have, individually or in the aggregate, a Parent Material Adverse Effect, and there are no actions, suits, inquiries, investigations or proceedings pending (or, to Parent’s knowledge, threatened) against or affecting Parent or its Subsidiaries, or any of their respective properties at law or in equity before, and there are no orders, judgments or decrees of, or before, any Governmental Entity, in each case which would have, individually or in the aggregate, a Parent Material Adverse Effect.

  • Jury Duty and Court Appearances Leave of absence without loss of pay and benefits will be provided to an employee summoned to serve on a jury or when subpoenaed or summoned as a witness in a criminal or civil proceeding not occasioned by the employee's private affairs, or when the employee accompanies a dependent child when the child is subpoenaed or summoned to appear as a witness in a criminal or civil proceeding. An employee in receipt of pay or benefits under this Article has the responsibility to reimburse the employer all monies paid to him/her by the Court, except travelling and meal allowances not reimbursed by the employer.

  • No Violation, Litigation or Regulatory Action 1. The Company has complied in all material respects with all requirements of any laws or court orders, which are applicable to the business and assets of the Project. 2. There are no lawsuits, claims, suits, proceedings or investigations pending or, to the knowledge of the Company, threatened against or affecting the Company in respect of the assets or the business of the Project nor, to the knowledge of the Company, is there any basis for any of the same, and there is no lawsuit, suit or proceeding pending in which the Company is the plaintiff or claimant which relates to the business or assets of the Project. 3. There is no action, suit or proceeding pending or, to the knowledge of the Company, threatened which questions the legality or propriety of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. 4. There has been no investigation conducted or charges, complaints or actions brought by the State of Illinois or any governmental body within the State of Illinois (including the Federal government) with respect to the Company or its officers and directors. 5. The Company and its officers and directors have not been the subject of any criminal investigations or charges. 6. The Company would not have Placed in Service the Capital Improvements and created or retained the requisite number of New Employees and Retained Employees without the benefits of the Credit. Proof of this shall include, but is not limited to, correspondence, financial plans and prospectuses, internal memoranda and other written documentation demonstrating the Company would not have taken the actions without the award of the Credit.

  • Litigation, Labor Controversies, etc There is no pending or, to the knowledge of the Borrower, threatened litigation, action, proceeding, or labor controversy affecting the Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries, or any of their respective properties, businesses, assets or revenues, which could reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect, except as disclosed in Item 6.7 ("Litigation") of the Disclosure Schedule.

  • Civil Actions Except where the Labour/Management Committee considers that there has been flagrant or wilful negligence on the part of an employee, the Employer agrees not to seek indemnity against an employee whose actions result in a judgment against the Employer. The Employer agrees to pay any judgment against an employee arising out of the performance of his/her duties. The Employer also agrees to pay any legal costs incurred in the proceedings including those of the employee.

  • Litigation and Related Matters The commencement of, or any material development in, any action, suit, proceeding or investigation affecting the Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries or any of their respective properties before any arbitrator or Governmental Authority, (i) in which the amount involved that the Borrower reasonably determines is not covered by insurance or other indemnity arrangement is $50,000,000 or more, (ii) with respect to any Document or any material Indebtedness or preferred stock of the Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries or (iii) which, if determined adversely to the Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries, could reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect.

  • Governing Law, Regulatory Authority, and Rules The validity, interpretation and enforcement of this Agreement and each of its provisions shall be governed by the laws of the state of New York, without regard to its conflicts of law principles. This Agreement is subject to all Applicable Laws and Regulations. Each Party expressly reserves the right to seek changes in, appeal, or otherwise contest any laws, orders, or regulations of a Governmental Authority.

  • Dismissal of Litigation Within five (5) days of the Effective Date, Summit, VISX and Pillar Point shall cause all of the Summit/VISX Litigation (as hereinafter defined) to be dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. As used herein, "Summit/VISX Litigation" means VISX Partner, Inc. v. Summit Partner, Inc., Santx Xxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx Court, Case No. CV 772057; VISX, Incorporated v. Pillar Point Partners, et al., Santx Xxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx Court, Case No. 770042; and VISX Partner, Inc., on behalf Pillar Point Partners, United States District Court, District Of Massachusetts, Case No. 96-11739-PBS. The term "Summit/VISX Litigation" includes all counterclaims, cross-claims and the like asserted in the foregoing actions.

  • Statutes; Court Orders No Law shall have been enacted, entered, promulgated or enforced by any court of competent jurisdiction or other Governmental Entity that prohibits the consummation of the Merger, and no Governmental Entity of competent jurisdiction shall have issued a final, non-appealable order or taken any other action permanently restraining, enjoining or otherwise prohibiting the consummation of the Merger or the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement.

  • ABSENCE OF LITIGATION AND/OR REGULATORY PROCEEDINGS Except as set forth in the SEC Documents, there is no action, suit, proceeding, inquiry or investigation before or by any court, public board, government agency, self-regulatory organization or body pending or, to the knowledge of the executive officers of Company or any of its Subsidiaries, threatened against or affecting the Company, the Common Stock or any of the Company’s Subsidiaries or any of the Company’s or the Company’s Subsidiaries’ officers or directors in their capacities as such, in which an adverse decision could have a Material Adverse Effect.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!