Jurisdiction Following Entry of the Judicial Consent Decree Sample Clauses

Jurisdiction Following Entry of the Judicial Consent Decree. Following entry of the Judicial Consent Decree, the Parties agree the United States District Court shall have jurisdiction over the subject matter of the Judicial Consent Decree and personal jurisdiction over, at a minimum, Atlantic Richfield, the Regional Board, and any other State Parties named as Settling Defendants in the Consent Decree with respect thereto. Solely for the purposes of the Judicial Consent Decree, Atlantic Richfield, the Regional Board, and any other State Party that executes the Consent Decree, hereby waive, and agree to ensure that the Judicial Consent Decree similarly waives, all objections, challenges, and defenses, whether based on immunity or other factual or legal grounds, that any such Party may have to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court. For purposes of this Section VII.B.2, a claim reserved under Section II.F.1 of this Agreement and arising after entry of the Judicial Consent Decree shall be considered to be within the subject matter of the Judicial Consent Decree and, accordingly, subject to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court, which jurisdiction shall not be challenged by the State Parties. If and to the extent the Judicial Consent Decree fails to adopt, incorporate, and supersede any of the operative provisions of this Agreement, the Parties agree that the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles shall retain and shall continue to have jurisdiction over the subject matter of this Agreement and over the Parties as necessary to enforce the terms of this Agreement. As between Atlantic Richfield and the State Parties, in the event of any conflict between the terms of the Judicial Consent Decree and this Agreement with respect to a Party’s obligation to perform Response Actions or pay Response Costs, this Agreement shall govern and control. In the event both the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles and the United States District Court have jurisdiction over a dispute between the parties or any matter requiring enforcement of the terms of this Agreement and/or the Judicial Consent Decree, the Parties agree that such dispute or matter shall be submitted to the United States District Court without the Parties filing any request for abstention by the United States District Court or asserting primary jurisdiction by another court or administrative agency or any similar objection to the dispute’s resolution by that court.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Jurisdiction Following Entry of the Judicial Consent Decree

  • Payment by the Judicial Council A. In accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the Judicial Council will pay the Contractor the actual cost not to exceed the total Contract Amount, as set forth in Table 1, below, for performing the Work of this Agreement. Payment will be at the prices set forth herein and based upon the actual and allowable cost to perform the Work. Table 1: Description Exhibit Estimated Total Cost Sleeping Rooms C $@,@@@.@@ Meeting and Function Rooms D $@,@@@.@@ Food and Beverage Service E $@,@@@.@@ Miscellaneous Requirements and Expenses F $@,@@@.@@ Total Contract Amount: $@@@@.@@

  • Program Requirements Provided At No Charge to the Judicial Council A. The Contractor shall provide the following items during the Program at no charge to the Judicial Council:

  • Waiver of Appellate and Post-Conviction Rights a. The defendant acknowledges, understands and agrees that by pleading guilty pursuant to this plea agreement he waives his right to appeal or collaterally attack a finding of guilt following the acceptance of this plea agreement, except on grounds of (1) ineffective assistance of counsel; or (2) prosecutorial misconduct.

  • Final Approval Order and Judgment 68. Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Approval of the Settlement will include a request to the Court for a scheduled date on which the Final Approval Hearing will occur. Plaintiff shall file her Motion for Final Approval of the Settlement, and application for attorneys’ fees, costs, and expenses and for Service Award for the Class Representative, no later than 45 days before the Final Approval Hearing. At the Final Approval Hearing, the Court will hear argument on Plaintiff’s Motion for Final Approval of the Settlement, and on Class Counsel’s application for attorneys’ fees, costs, and expenses, and for the Service Award for the Class Representative. In the Court’s discretion, the Court also will hear argument at the Final Approval Hearing from any Settlement Class Members (or their counsel) who object to the Settlement or to Class Counsel’s application for attorneys’ fees, costs, expenses, or the Service Award application, provided the objector(s) submitted timely objections that meet all of the requirements listed in the Agreement.

  • COMPETENT JURISDICTION The entire Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of Gibraltar and the parties hereto irrevocably submit to the jurisdiction of the Courts of Gibraltar and irrevocably consents to the service of process out of such Courts by mailing copies thereof by registered mail, postage prepaid to his/her address.

  • Arbitrator's Jurisdiction The jurisdiction and authority of the arbitrator and his opinion and award shall be confined exclusively to the interpretation and/or application of the provision(s) of this Agreement at issue between the Union and the Administration. The arbitrator shall have no authority to add to, detract from, alter, amend, or modify any provision of this Agreement; to impose on either party a limitation or obligation not explicitly provided for in this Agreement; or to establish or alter any wage rate or wage structure. The arbitrator shall not hear or decide more than one grievance without the mutual consent of the Administration and the Union. The written award of the arbitrator on the merits of any grievance adjudicated within his jurisdiction and authority shall be final and binding on the aggrieved employee, the Union and the Administration, unless either party contests it before a court of competent jurisdiction as permitted by state law.

  • Invoicing for Charges Against the Judicial Council’s Master Account A. The Contractor shall establish a Master Account for the Judicial Council’s charges provided for under the exhibits of this Agreement.

  • Governing Law; Jurisdiction; Venue This Agreement and all acts and transactions hereunder and all rights and obligations of Silicon and Borrower shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. As a material part of the consideration to Silicon to enter into this Agreement, Borrower (i) agrees that all actions and proceedings relating directly or indirectly to this Agreement shall, at Silicon's option, be litigated in courts located within California, and that the exclusive venue therefor shall be Santa Xxxxx County; (ii) consents to the jurisdiction and venue of any such court and consents to service of process in any such action or proceeding by personal delivery or any other method permitted by law; and (iii) waives any and all rights Borrower may have to object to the jurisdiction of any such court, or to transfer or change the venue of any such action or proceeding.

  • Recourse to Agencies or Courts of Competent Jurisdiction Notwithstanding Section 11.2, nothing in this Agreement shall restrict the rights of a Party to file a complaint with the FERC under relevant provisions of the Federal Power Act or with the PUCO under relevant provisions of the Legal Authorities. The Parties’ agreement under this Section 11.3 is without prejudice to any Party’s right to contest jurisdiction of the FERC or PUCO to which a complaint is brought.

  • Jurisdiction of Courts Québec hereby appoints the person from time to time who holds the position of Delegate General of Québec in New York, Xxx Xxxxxxxxxxx Xxxxx, 00xx xxxxx, Xxx Xxxx, Xxx Xxxx 00000-0000, as its authorized agent (the “Authorized Agent”) upon whom process may be served in any action by any Underwriter, or by any person controlling such Underwriter, and based upon this Agreement which may be instituted in any State or Federal court in The City of New York, and expressly accepts the non-exclusive jurisdiction of any such court in respect of such action. Québec hereby irrevocably waives any immunity to service of process in respect of any such action to which the Authorized Agent might otherwise be entitled. Such appointment shall be irrevocable as long as any of the Securities remain outstanding, except that, if for any reason the Authorized Agent ceases to be able to act as agent or no longer has an address in The City of New York, Québec will appoint another person or persons in The City of New York, selected in its discretion, as Authorized Agent(s). Québec will take any and all action, including the filing of any and all documents and instruments that may be necessary to continue such appointment or appointments in full force and effect as aforesaid. Service of process upon the Authorized Agent together with written notice of such service mailed or delivered to Québec at its address set forth in Section 11, shall be deemed in every respect effective service of process upon Québec. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any action by an Underwriter, or by any person controlling such Underwriter, and based upon this Agreement may be instituted in any competent court in Québec. Québec hereby waives, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, any immunity to jurisdiction to which it might otherwise be entitled in any action based on this Agreement which may be instituted as provided in this Section in any State or Federal court in The City of New York or in any competent court in Québec.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.