Justification of financing required Sample Clauses

Justification of financing required. The following table outlines effort for the first 2 years of the project for NA3 – User Training and Induction. Effort shown as “Unfunded” is matching effort contributed from the partners’ existing Grid and related activities. The separation between “Funded” and “Unfunded” depends on the accounting model chosen by each partner. For Full Cost (FC and FCF) model partners, the funded effort is reimbursed at 50%. Both funded and unfunded effort committed to the project will be subject to reporting to the European Commission. This table differs from those showing effort elsewhere in the project as, in the context of training, it is possible to use bursts of effort in a location, and to achieve presentation of courses with a few person weeks of effort. For example, the typical arrangement will be that NeSC (UEDIN) will produce (revise) a course, or set of courses. Then a team in a particular country will translate (revise) that material in the local language, schedule and arrange local presentations, and conduct the courses with support from the NeSC team when it is required. This means that, in contrast with software engineering and operations, sustained engagement is not necessary. Consequently, it is an advantage to plan to use small units of labour resource in a large number of locations, as this will reach a large user community. We also take into account the different employment costs in these different countries.

Justification of financing required. The following table outlines effort for the first 2 years of the project for NA3 – User Training and Induction. Effort shown in brackets is matching effort contributed from the partners’ existing Grid and related activities. Both funded and unfunded effort committed to the project will be subject to reporting to the European Commission. This table differs from those showing effort elsewhere in the project as, in the context of training, it is possible to use bursts of effort in a location, and to achieve presentation of courses with a few person weeks of effort. E.G. the typical arrangement will be that NeSC (UEDIN) will produce (revise) a course, or set of courses. Then a team in a particular country will translate (revise) that material in the local language, schedule and arrange local presentations, and conduct the courses with support from the NeSC team when it is required. This means that, in contrast with software engineering and operations, sustained engagement is not necessary. Consequently, it is an advantage to plan to use small units of labour resource in a large number of locations, as this will reach a large user community. We also take into account the different employment costs in these different countries.