Common use of Library Rank Promotion Committee Procedures Clause in Contracts

Library Rank Promotion Committee Procedures. (i) The chairperson of the Peer Evaluation Committee shall forward to the Library Rank Promotion Committee the documentation for each candidate to be considered by the Library Rank Promotion Committee. The documentation shall include the complete dossier together with a written submission from the Peer Evaluation Committee. (ii) The chairperson of the Peer Evaluation Committee shall present the cases of all the candidates to the Library Rank Promotion Committee. (iii) The Library Rank Promotion Committee shall consider for promotion each candidate on evidence presented. If the Library Rank Promotion Committee proposes to recommend against promotion it shall, before making a final recommendation, notify the candidate of its tentative decision and invite the candidate to comment on the proposed recommendation. The candidate shall have the right to meet with the Library Rank Promotion Committee to discuss these reasons and/or to submit a response in writing before the recommendation is formally made to the President. (iv) The University Librarian, as chairperson of the Committee, shall maintain a record of the results of the balloting and the recommendations of the Committee and shall make these known to all members of the Committee present at the time and other members, if any, within five (5) working days thereafter. (v) The Library Rank Promotion Committee shall recommend for promotion to the President by April 15 of each year those candidates receiving a majority of votes cast. (vi) In the case of recommendations against promotion, the Library Rank Promotion Committee shall indicate in writing to the candidate at least in which area or areas of performance the Committee would expect evidence of further development before recommending in favour of promotion.

Library Rank Promotion Committee Procedures. (i) The chairperson Chairperson of the Peer Evaluation Committee shall forward to the Library Rank Promotion Committee the documentation for each candidate to be considered by the Library Rank Promotion Committee. The documentation shall include the complete dossier together with a written submission from the Peer Evaluation Committee. (ii) The chairperson Chairperson of the Peer Evaluation Committee shall present the cases of all the candidates to the Library Rank Promotion Committee. (iii) The Library Rank Promotion Committee shall consider for promotion each candidate on evidence presented. If the Library Rank Promotion Committee proposes to recommend against promotion it shall, before making a final recommendation, notify the candidate of its tentative decision and invite the candidate to comment on the proposed recommendation. The candidate shall have the right to meet with the Library Rank Promotion Committee to discuss these reasons and/or to submit a response in writing before the recommendation is formally made to the President. (iv) The University Librarian, as chairperson Chairperson of the Committee, shall maintain a record of the results of the balloting and the recommendations of the Committee and shall make these known to all members of the Committee present at the time and other members, if any, within five (5) working days thereafter. (v) The Library Rank Promotion Committee shall recommend for promotion to the President by April 15 of each year those candidates receiving a majority of votes cast. (vi) In the case of recommendations against promotion, the Library Rank Promotion Committee shall indicate in writing to the candidate at least in which area or areas of performance the Committee would expect evidence of further development before recommending in favour of promotion.

Library Rank Promotion Committee Procedures. (i) The chairperson of the Peer Evaluation Committee shall forward to the Library Rank Promotion Committee the documentation for each candidate to be considered by the Library Rank Promotion Committee. The documentation shall include the complete dossier together with a written submission from the Peer Evaluation Committee. (ii) . The chairperson of the Peer Evaluation Committee shall present the cases of all the candidates to the Library Rank Promotion Committee. (iii) . The Library Rank Promotion Committee shall consider for promotion each candidate on evidence presented. If the Library Rank Promotion Committee proposes to recommend against promotion it shall, before making a final recommendation, notify the candidate of its tentative decision and invite the candidate to comment on the proposed recommendation. The candidate shall have the right to meet with the Library Rank Promotion Committee to discuss these reasons and/or to submit a response in writing before the recommendation is formally made to the President. (iv) . The University Librarian, as chairperson of the Committee, shall maintain a record of the results of the balloting and the recommendations of the Committee and shall make these known to all members of the Committee present at the time and other members, if any, within five (5) working days thereafter. (v) . The Library Rank Promotion Committee shall recommend for promotion to the President by April 15 of each year those candidates receiving a majority of votes cast. (vi) In the case of recommendations against promotion, the Library Rank Promotion Committee shall indicate in writing to the candidate at least in which area or areas of performance the Committee would expect evidence of further development before recommending in favour of promotion.

Library Rank Promotion Committee Procedures. (i) The chairperson of the Peer Evaluation Committee shall forward to the Library Rank Promotion Committee the documentation for each candidate to be considered by the Library Rank Promotion Committee. The documentation shall include the complete dossier together with a written submission from the Peer Evaluation Committee. (ii) . The chairperson of the Peer Evaluation Committee shall present the cases of all the candidates to the Library Rank Promotion Committee. (iii) . The Library Rank Promotion Committee shall consider for promotion each candidate on evidence presented. If the Library Rank Promotion Committee proposes to recommend against promotion it shall, before making a final recommendation, notify the candidate of its tentative decision and invite the candidate to comment on the proposed recommendation. The candidate shall have the right to meet with the Library Rank Promotion Committee to discuss these reasons and/or to submit a response in writing before the recommendation is formally made to the President. (iv) . The University Librarian, as chairperson of the Committee, shall maintain a record of the results of the balloting and the recommendations of the Committee and shall make these known to all members of the Committee present at the time and other members, if any, within five (5) working days thereafter. (v) . The Library Rank Promotion Committee shall recommend for promotion to the President by April 15 of each year those candidates receiving a majority of votes cast. (vi) . In the case of recommendations against promotion, the Library Rank Promotion Committee shall indicate in writing to the candidate at least in which area or areas of performance the Committee would expect evidence of further development before recommending in favour of promotion. A candidate not recommended by the appropriate committee or promoted by the Board of Governors has recourse to the procedures under Article or as appropriate.