Limitations and directions for future Sample Clauses

Limitations and directions for future research The results in this study have been obtained by using self-report questionnaires. To obtain meaningful results we used questionnaires that were validated and structurally equivalent across cultural groups as much as possible. However, in studies with immigrant children it has been found that using teacher and parental reports may provide results that are different from those obtained in self-reports (Xxxxxxxxx et al., 1990; Xxxxxxx & Xxxxx, 1993; Xxxxxxx et al., 2003). As schools only had a limited amount of time to participate in research we could not use a longitudinal design. The hypothesized directions of effects that are presented in this book are all derived from theoretical frameworks and prior research, but without a longitudinal design we cannot be sure that the hypothesized direction of the effects is correct. A third important point of critique has to be made with regards to the samples. Immigrant students are known to drop out of junior vocational education more often than national students, 16.8 percent as opposed to 11.2 percent (Herweijer, 2009); this may have contributed to finding confirmation for the immigrant paradox. This study provides an overview of the acculturation and adaptation of the largest group of immigrant adolescents in the Netherlands, those in junior vocational education. When compared with other adolescents in junior vocational education these immigrant adolescents are doing rather well. However, when compared to a nationwide sample, the under representation in higher education suggests that the position of immigrant adolescents remains to be improved. As such, future studies should address the question why immigrant adolescents have a positive pattern of adaptation, but fail to perform as well as national students in terms of education.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Limitations and directions for future research A study of this nature, where links are sought between a range of variables that are essentially predictors, is best served by regression analysis. However due to extensive recruitment difficulties, large enough Ns were not possible to make regression feasible. The scarcity of fathers with OCD in major mental health facilities identifiable as a recruitment strategy and in general was curious and the answer could be twofold. It is well known that men with OCD are less likely to marry and have children (Castle, Xxxxx et al. 1995); therefore this scarcity could be a genuine reflection of reality. However given the nature of the participating father’s obsessional thoughts (the majority concerning harming their children or family) it is also possible they stay away from statutory services through fear of negative consequences. This may explain why the majority of OCD fathers were recruited via adverts rather than through mental health services. Additionally it is possible that the burden of taking part in research for the few that were undergoing treatment was prohibitive for these fathers. This is supported by the fact that the one father who was recruited via an IAPT service dropped out of the project. In being able to run regression analysis it would also be desirable to have measures of maternal factors to see what proportion of variance in COCD scores is accounted for by each parent as in the Kilic studies (Xxxxx, Xxxxxxx et al. 2003; Xxxxx, Xxxxx et al. 2011). Given the fathers group also have significant levels of comorbidity (although similar to those identified in the literature e.g. by Xxxxxxx, Xxxxx et al. (2001) this type of analysis would also allow more sophisticated examination of the role of comorbidities in child outcomes. Another route to teasing apart the effects of comorbidity would be to examine a group of fathers with moderate to severe depression with the same measures and compare results to the OCD fathers. A related issue is the recruitment of the participating fathers in terms of volunteering. Informal conversations at first contact revealed that the reasons fathers took part in the study fell into two groups: 1. Those who believed OCD was genetic and little to do with parenting 2. Those who felt their OCD had developed as a result of their own parenting and were concerned the pattern would repeat in the next generation. Whilst both groups were concerned about their children developing OCD, these ideas are likely to have influ...

Related to Limitations and directions for future

  • Exceptions and Limitations For the avoidance of doubt, where Exceptions and Limitations apply to Your use, this Public License does not apply, and You do not need to comply with its terms and conditions.

  • Conditions and Limitations The admission of any Person as a Substituted Member or an Additional Member shall be conditioned upon (i) such Person’s written acceptance and adoption of all the terms and provisions of this Agreement, either by (A) execution and delivery of a counterpart signature page to this Agreement countersigned by the Managing Member on behalf of the Company or (B) any other writing evidencing the intent of such Person to become a Substituted Member or an Additional Member and such writing is accepted by the Managing Member on behalf of the Company.

  • Funding Disclaimers and Labeling A. Grantee shall not use System Agency’s name or refer to System Agency directly or indirectly in any media appearance, public service announcement, or disclosure relating to this Grant Agreement including any promotional material without first obtaining written consent from System Agency. The foregoing prohibition includes, without limitation, the placement of banners, pop-up ads, or other advertisements promoting Grantee’s or a third party’s products, services, workshops, trainings, or other commercial offerings on any website portal or internet-based service or software application hosted or managed by Grantee. This does not limit the Grantee’s responsibility to comply with obligations related to the Texas Public Information Act or Texas Open Meetings Act.

  • Limitation of Vendor Indemnification and Similar Clauses This is a requirement of the TIPS Contract and is non-negotiable. TIPS, a department of Region 8 Education Service Center, a political subdivision, and local government entity of the State of Texas, is prohibited from indemnifying third-parties (pursuant to the Article 3, Section 52 of the Texas Constitution) except as otherwise specifically provided for by law or as ordered by a court of competent jurisdiction. Article 3, Section 52 of the Texas Constitution states that "no debt shall be created by or on behalf of the State … " and the Texas Attorney General has opined that a contractually imposed obligation of indemnity creates a "debt" in the constitutional sense. Tex. Att'y Gen. Op. No. MW-475 (1982). Thus, contract clauses which require TIPS to indemnify Vendor, pay liquidated damages, pay attorney's fees, waive Vendor's liability, or waive any applicable statute of limitations must be deleted or qualified with ''to the extent permitted by the Constitution and Laws of the State of Texas." Does Vendor agree? Yes, I Agree (Yes) Alternative Dispute Resolution Limitations This is a requirement of the TIPS Contract and is non-negotiable. TIPS, a department of Region 8 Education Service Center, a political subdivision, and local government entity of the State of Texas, does not agree to binding arbitration as a remedy to dispute and no such provision shall be permitted in this Agreement with TIPS. Vendor agrees that any claim arising out of or related to this Agreement, except those specifically and expressly waived or negotiated within this Agreement, may be subject to non-binding mediation at the request of either party to be conducted by a mutually agreed upon mediator as prerequisite to the filing of any lawsuit arising out of or related to this Agreement. Mediation shall be held in either Camp or Titus County, Texas. Agreements reached in mediation will be subject to the approval by the Region 8 ESC's Board of Directors, authorized signature of the Parties if approved by the Board of Directors, and, once approved by the Board of Directors and properly signed, shall thereafter be enforceable as provided by the laws of the State of Texas. Does Vendor agree? Yes Does Vendor agree? Yes, Vendor agrees (Yes) No Waiver of TIPS Immunity This is a requirement of the TIPS Contract and is non-negotiable. Vendor agrees that nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as a waiver of sovereign or government immunity; nor constitute or be construed as a waiver of any of the privileges, rights, defenses, remedies, or immunities available to Region 8 Education Service Center or its TIPS Department. The failure to enforce, or any delay in the enforcement, of any privileges, rights, defenses, remedies, or immunities available to Region 8 Education Service Center or its TIPS Department under this Agreement or under applicable law shall not constitute a waiver of such privileges, rights, defenses, remedies, or immunities or be considered as a basis for estoppel. 5 Does Vendor agree? Yes, Vendor agrees (Yes)

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!