MILESTONES AND MEANS OF VERIFICATION Sample Clauses

MILESTONES AND MEANS OF VERIFICATION. Milestone number Milestone description Indicative completion date Means of verification
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
MILESTONES AND MEANS OF VERIFICATION. Milestone number Milestone description Indicative completion date Means of verification 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Table 1: Planned sources of financing of the eligible costs of the action Financing sources Amount of financial contribution to the action eligible costs (EUR) MIT Amount of financial contribution to the action eligible costs (EUR) MEDDE Table 2: Indicative breakdown per activity and per beneficiary of estimated eligible costs of the action (EUR) Activities 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total Pro-rata share of the estimated eligible costs (%) Eligible direct costs Table 3: Indicative breakdown per beneficiary of the maximum CEF contribution (EUR) Estimated contribution Pro-rata share of the maximum CEF contribution (%) MIT 449,335,327 55.22% MEDDE 364,446,573 44.78% Total 813,781,900 100.00% "
MILESTONES AND MEANS OF VERIFICATION. Milestone number Milestone description Indicative completion date Means of verification Table 1: Planned sources of financing of the eligible costs of the action Financing sources Amount of financial contribution to the action eligible costs (EUR) MTES Amount of financial contribution to the action eligible costs (EUR) ASFA Amount of financial contribution to the action eligible costs (EUR) DdI Amount of financial contribution to the action eligible costs (EUR) Bordeaux INP Amount of financial contribution to the action eligible costs (EUR) CEREMA Financing sources Amount of financial contribution to the action eligible costs (EUR) URCA Amount of financial contribution to the action eligible costs (EUR) UPHF Amount of financial contribution to the action eligible costs (EUR) VEDECOM Amount of financial contribution to the action eligible costs (EUR) GC Amount of financial contribution to the action eligible costs (EUR) KEYNECTIS Financing sources Amount of financial contribution to the action eligible costs (EUR) CeA Amount of financial contribution to the action eligible costs (EUR) EMS Amount of financial contribution to the action eligible costs (EUR) Aix-en-Provence Amount of financial contribution to the action eligible costs (EUR) UGE Table 2: Indicative breakdown per activity and per beneficiary of estimated eligible costs of the action (EUR) Activities 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Total Pro-rata share of the estimated eligible costs (%) Eligible direct costs Activity 1 54,382 179,690 209,441 135,208 125,116 703,837 3.27 Activity 2 596,428 2,906,402 3,045,185 3,651,064 2,752,536 12,951,615 60.15 Activity 3 539,122 1,283,789 1,760,021 2,332,866 845,466 6,761,264 31.4 Activity 4 104,928 257,542 265,901 265,851 222,476 1,116,698 5.19 TOTAL ELIGIBLE DIRECT COSTS 1,294,860 4,627,423 5,280,548 6,384,989 3,945,594 21,533,414 100 Annual instalments of maximum CEF contribution 647,430 2,313,711.5 2,640,274 3,192,494.5 1,972,797 10,766,707 50 EMS 0 0 0 46,725 46,725 93,450 0.43 Aix-en-Provence 0 0 0 30,000 22,500 52,500 0.24 UGE 0 172,500 142,500 240,000 224,270 779,270 3.62 Table 3: Indicative breakdown per beneficiary of the maximum CEF contribution (EUR) Estimated contribution Pro-rata share of the maximum CEF contribution (%) MTES 3,220,825 29.91% ASFA 964,323 8.96% DdI 222,373 2.07% Bordeaux INP 245,000 2.28% CEREMA 841,636 7.82% EURECOM 102,009 0.95% IGN 228,768 2.12% IMT 689,900 6.41% UCA 197,500 1.83% URCA 295,500 2.74% UPHF 352,000 3.27% VEDECOM 150,814 ...

Related to MILESTONES AND MEANS OF VERIFICATION

  • Third Party Verification 4.8.1 The SPD shall be further required to provide entry to the site of the Power Project free of all encumbrances at all times during the Term of the Agreement to SECI and a third Party nominated by any Indian Governmental Instrumentality for inspection and verification of the works being carried out by the SPD at the site of the Power Project. 4.8.2 The third party may verify the construction works/operation of the Power Project being carried out by the SPD and if it is found that the construction works/operation of the Power Project is not as per the Prudent Utility Practices, it may seek clarifications from SPD or require the works to be stopped or to comply with the instructions of such third party.

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order. (b) The technical evaluation committee may call the responsive bidders for discussion or presentation to facilitate and assess their understanding of the scope of work and its execution. However, the committee shall have sole discretion to call for discussion / presentation. (c) Financial bids of only those bidders who qualify the technical criteria will be opened provided all other requirements are fulfilled. (d) AIIMS Jodhpur shall have right to accept or reject any or all tenders without assigning any reasons thereof.

  • Medical Verification The Town may require medical verification of an employee’s absence if the Town perceives the employee is abusing sick leave or has used an excessive amount of sick leave. The Town may require medical verification of an employee’s absence to verify that the employee is able to return to work with or without restrictions.

  • E-Verification The Vendor represents and warrants that it will ensure its compliance with the Mississippi Employment Protection Act of 2008, and will register and participate in the status verification system for all newly hired employees. Mississippi Code Annotated §§71-11-1 et seq. The term “employee” as used herein means any person that is hired to perform work within the State of Mississippi. As used herein, “status verification system” means the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigration Responsibility Act of 1996 that is operated by the United States Department of Homeland Security, also known as the E-Verify Program, or any other successor electronic verification system replacing the E-Verify Program. Vendor agrees to maintain records of such compliance. Upon request of the State and after approval of the Social Security Administration or Department of Homeland Security when required, Vendor agrees to provide a copy of each such verification. Vendor further represents and warrants that any person assigned to perform services hereafter meets the employment eligibility requirements of all immigration laws. The breach of this agreement may subject Vendor to the following: termination of this contract for goods or services and ineligibility for any state or public contract in Mississippi for up to three (3) years with notice of such cancellation/termination being made public; the loss of any license, permit, certification, or other document granted to Vendor by an agency, department or governmental entity for the right to do business in Mississippi for up to one (1) year; or,

  • Search, Enquiry, Investigation, Examination And Verification a. The Property is sold on an “as is where is basis” subject to all the necessary inspection, search (including but not limited to the status of title), enquiry (including but not limited to the terms of consent to transfer and/or assignment and outstanding charges), investigation, examination and verification of which the Purchaser is already advised to conduct prior to the auction and which the Purchaser warrants to the Assignee has been conducted by the Purchaser’s independent legal advisors at the time of execution of the Memorandum. b. The intending bidder or the Purchaser is responsible at own costs and expenses to make and shall be deemed to have carried out own search, enquiry, investigation, examination and verification on all liabilities and encumbrances affecting the Property, the title particulars as well as the accuracy and correctness of the particulars and information provided. c. The Purchaser shall be deemed to purchase the Property in all respects subject thereto and shall also be deemed to have full knowledge of the state and condition of the Property regardless of whether or not the said search, enquiry, investigation, examination and verification have been conducted. d. The Purchaser shall be deemed to have read, understood and accepted these Conditions of Sale prior to the auction and to have knowledge of all matters which would have been disclosed thereby and the Purchaser expressly warrants to the Assignee that the Purchaser has sought independent legal advice on all matters pertaining to this sale and has been advised by his/her/its independent legal advisor of the effect of all the Conditions of Sale. e. Neither the Assignee nor the Auctioneer shall be required or bound to inform the Purchaser of any such matters whether known to them or not and the Purchaser shall raise no enquiry, requisition or objection thereon or thereto.

  • Program Monitoring and Evaluation The Recipient shall prepare, or cause to be prepared, and furnish to the Association not later than six months after the Closing Date, a report of such scope and in such detail as the Association shall reasonably request, on the execution of the Program, the performance by the Recipient and the Association of their respective obligations under the Legal Agreements and the accomplishment of the purposes of the Financing.”

  • Electronic Visit Verification ("EVV A. To ensure: 1. the EVV system is used to verify the provision of services governed under 40 TAC, Chapter 68 or its successor; 2. only authorized people access the Contractor's EVV account; 3. all data elements required by HHSC or HHSC's designee are uploaded or entered and maintained in the EVV system completely, accurately, and prior to submitting the claim; 4. that each time services governed by 40 TAC Chapter 68 or its successor are delivered to an individual, the Contractor's staff uses an HHSC-approved EVV system; and 5. service delivery documentation is immediately available for review by HHSC when requested. B. Equipment provided to Contractor by HHSC, HHSC’s designee, or an HHSC-approved EVV vendor, must be returned in good condition when the equipment is no longer needed under this Contract. In the context of this agreement, “good condition” means Contractor must not place any marks or identifying information on the equipment and may not alter information on the equipment including logos and serial numbers. If the equipment is lost, stolen, marked, altered or damaged by Contractor, Contractor may be required to pay the replacement cost for each piece of equipment that is lost, stolen, marked or damaged. Replacement costs for lost, stolen, marked or damaged equipment may be assessed periodically. If Contractor recovers previously lost or stolen equipment for which Contractor paid the replacement cost in the prior 12 months, Contractor may return the equipment and be reimbursed for the replacement costs within 12 months of the date HHSC, HHSC’s designee or an HHSC-approved EVV vendor (as applicable) received payment in full from the Contractor. This is provided the equipment is returned in good condition as specified above. C. HHSC may perform EVV compliance oversight reviews to determine if Contractor has complied with EVV compliance requirements as outlined in 40 TAC Chapter 68 or its successor, EVV Policy posted on the HHSC EVV website or EVV Policy Handbook. D. If the Contractor determines an electronic record in the EVV system needs to be adjusted at any time, the Contractor will make the adjustment in the EVV system using the most appropriate EVV reason code number(s), EVV reason code description(s) and enter any required free text when completing visit maintenance in the EVV system, if applicable. E. Contractor must begin using an HHSC-approved EVV system prior to submitting an EVV relevant claim. F. All claims for services required to use EVV (EVV claims) must match to an accepted EVV visit transaction in the EVV Aggregator (the state’s centralized EVV database) prior to reimbursement of an EVV claim. Without a matching accepted EVV visit transaction, the claim will be denied. G. Contractor must submit all EVV related claims through the Texas Medicaid Claims Administrator, or as otherwise described in the EVV Policy posted on the HHSC EVV website or in the EVV Policy Handbook. H. Contractor must complete all required EVV training as outlined in the EVV Policy posted on the HHSC EVV website or EVV Policy Handbook: • Prior to using either an EVV vendor system or an EVV proprietary system and • Yearly thereafter. I. Contractor and, if applicable, the Contractor’s appointed EVV system administrator, must complete, sign and date the EVV Onboarding Form as outlined in 40 TAC Chapter 68 or its successor, EVV Policy posted on the HHSC website or EVV Policy Handbook.

  • Evaluation, Testing, and Monitoring 1. The System Agency may review, test, evaluate and monitor Grantee’s Products and services, as well as associated documentation and technical support for compliance with the Accessibility Standards. Review, testing, evaluation and monitoring may be conducted before and after the award of a contract. Testing and monitoring may include user acceptance testing. Neither the review, testing (including acceptance testing), evaluation or monitoring of any Product or service, nor the absence of review, testing, evaluation or monitoring, will result in a waiver of the State’s right to contest the Grantee’s assertion of compliance with the Accessibility Standards. 2. Grantee agrees to cooperate fully and provide the System Agency and its representatives timely access to Products, records, and other items and information needed to conduct such review, evaluation, testing, and monitoring.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!