MUTUAL RECOMMENDATION – APPROVAL OF MOU Sample Clauses

MUTUAL RECOMMENDATION – APPROVAL OF MOU. This agreement constitutes a mutual recommendation of this new MOU by the parties hereto, to the City Council, that one or more ordinances and/or resolutions be adopted and implemented accepting its provisions and effecting the changes enumerated herein relating to wages, hours, benefits and other terms and conditions of employment for unit employees represented by the Xxxxxx City Employees Association.
Sample 1Sample 2See All (7)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
MUTUAL RECOMMENDATION – APPROVAL OF MOU. This agreement constitutes a mutual recommendation of this new MOU by the parties hereto, to the City Council, that one or more ordinances and/or resolutions be adopted and implemented accepting its provisions and effecting the changes enumerated herein relating to wages, hours, benefits and other terms and conditions of employment for unit employees represented by the Xxxxxx City Police Officers Association. – A – Acting Pay 11 Accumulation, Use and Requests for Leave 38 Accumulation of Leave 38 Advance of Vacation or Sick Leave 38 Failure to File a Prior Request 38 Requesting Leave 38 Use of Leave 38 Agency Shop 3 – B – Bargaining Unit Changes 2 Bilingual Pay 17 Compensation 18 Limitations 18 Purpose 17 Qualification 18 – C – CalPERS Cost Sharing 27 CalPERS Employee Contribution for “Classic” Members 26 CalPERS Employee Contribution for “New Member” Employees Hired on or after January 1, 2013 and Defined as Such in in Accordance with AB 340 27 PERS Employee Retirement Contributions 26 Change of Assignment 14 Regular Assignments 14 City Rights – Content and Contractors 34 Civil Service Rules/City Policies 57 Compensatory Time 24 Excess Compensatory Time 24 Maximum Accumulation 24 Separation from Service 24 – D – Dental Insurance 32 Discipline 55 Deductions 3 Dues / Insurance Check-Off 3 Indemnification 4 Drugs and Alcohol in the Workplace 56 – E – Emergency Waiver 57 Employee and Employer Rights 2 Equivalent Biweekly, Monthly and Annual Rate. 9 – F – Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA) & California Family Rights Act (CFRA) 52 Approval Process for FMLA 53 Eligibility for FMLA and CFRA 52 Employee Rights under FMLA 53 Expiration of FMLA 54 Privacy under FMLA 53 Use of Accruals While on FMLA 54 Field Training Officer Pay 13 Compensation 13 Purpose 13 Frequency of Paycheck Issuance 9 Full Agreement and Implementation 58 Compliance 58 Full Agreement – Waiver of Meet and Confer 57 Obligation to Support 58 – G – Grievance 55 General Provisions 57 – H – – I – Initial Pay Rate Determination 10 Initial Pay Rate for Police Recruit 10 Initial Pay Rates for Police Officers 10 In-Lieu of Holidays 39 Accrual Balance Not to Exceed Maximum Annual In-Lieu of Holidays 39 Bi-Weekly Accrual Rate 39 One-Time Annual Election – 112 Hours (Non-PERSable) 39 Cash-Out Option 40 Conversion to Deferred Compensation 40 Eligibility 39 Limitation 40 IRS Section 125 Flexible Spending Account 33 – J – – L – Leaves of Absence 38 Leaves of Absence Policy 38 Leaves of Absence without Pay 49 Benef...
Sample 1
MUTUAL RECOMMENDATION – APPROVAL OF MOU. This agreement constitutes a mutual recommendation of this new MOU by the parties hereto, to the City Council, that one or more ordinances and/or resolutions be adopted and implemented accepting its provisions and effecting the changes enumerated herein relating to wages, hours, benefits and other terms and conditions of employment for unit employees represented by the Xxxxxx City Police Officers Association. Appendix "A" OPERATIONS BUREAU Sample Work Schedule TEAM 1 TEAM 2 TEAM 3 TEAM 4 TEAM 5 4/10 Days 4/10 Mids 4/10 Xxxxxx Total Officers Assigned to Patrol 3/12.5 Days 3/12.5 Xxxxxx TWThF 0600-1600 TWThF 1400-0000 TWThF 2100-0700 SaSuM 0700-1930 SaSuM 1900-0730 Lieutenant Lieutenant Team 1: 8 (6) Lieutenant Lieutenant Lieutenant Team 2: 8 (6) Lieutenant Team 3: 8 (7) Sergeant Sergeant Sergeant Team 4: 8 (8) Sergeants Sergeant Sergeant Sergeant Sergeant Team 5: 8 (8) Sergeant Sergeant Sergeant Sergeant Sergeant Officers Officers Officers Total on Teams: 40 Minimum: 35 Officers Officers
Sample 1

Related to MUTUAL RECOMMENDATION – APPROVAL OF MOU

  • Conclusion and Recommendations D. Evaluations for Offenders without a sex offense conviction shall answer the following additional referral questions in the evaluations:

  • Approval of Agreement The Board of Directors of the Company has authorized the execution and delivery of this Agreement by the Company and has approved this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby.

  • Approval/Non-Approval We will notify you whether your Application has been approved or denied within 14 days after the date we receive a completed Application. Notification may be in person or by mail or telephone unless you have requested that notification be by mail. You must not assume approval until you receive actual notice of approval. The 14-day time period may be changed only by separate written agreement.

  • Application Approval Our representative will notify you (or one of you, if there are co-applicants) of the Application approval, execute the Lease agreements for signature prior to occupancy, and, once complete, credit the application deposit of all applicants toward the required security deposit.

  • Conclusions and Recommendations The demonstration and evaluation process provided an opportunity to test community specific tools with a range of end users from the memory institution domain and to gain greater insight into both the current and future evolution of the SHAMAN prototypes for preservation, access and re-use. Xxxx et al. (2000) in their user evaluation study of the Alexandria Digital Library which incorporated the evaluation of a Web prototype by earth scientists, information specialists and educators raised four key questions in relation to their findings that SHAMAN may be well advised to consider, they are paraphrased here with our conclusions from the investigations. What have we learned about our target organizations and potential users?  Memory institutions are most definitely not a homogenised group; their needs and requirements differ greatly across the domain.  Representatives of the archives community are agreed on the benefits of SHAMAN‟s authenticity validation function.  The representatives of government information services remained unconvinced as to the need or benefit of grid technologies or distributed ingest while librarians saw the value of grid access as an asset of the framework. What have we learned about the evaluation approach for digital preservation?  Within the limits of the exercise, in terms of time-frame and resources, the approach adopted has generated useful information for the further development of demonstrators and for the development of the SHAMAN framework overall. What have we learned about the SHAMAN ISP1 demonstrator?  Respondents to the evaluation questionnaires and the focus groups indicate that, overall, the presentation of the demonstrator worked effectively and that, in general, participants in the demonstration and evaluation events were able to understand the intentions of the demonstration and to apply the ideas presented to their own context. What have we learned about the applicability of the SHAMAN framework to memory institutions?  Respondents to the questionnaires and participants in the focus groups readily identified the value of the SHAMAN framework to their own operations. The majority had not yet established a long-term digital preservation policy, but recognized the need. Generally, the concepts of distributed ingest and grid operations found favour.  Virtually all practitioners in the focus groups, however, drew attention to need of a lower level demonstration that would be closer to their everyday preservation troubles, especially for digital preservation to be applied to non-textual materials, such as film, photographs and sound archives. In addition to the criteria suggested by Xxxx et al., we can add a further project-related question: What have we learned that has implications for the training and dissemination phase of the Project?  It was not part of the remit of the demonstration and evaluation specifically to discover information of relevance to the training and dissemination function. However, a number of factors will affect the efficacy of any training programme in particular. o First, no common understanding of digital preservation can be assumed of the potential target audiences for training. Consequently, it is likely that self-paced learning materials will be most effective in presenting the SHAMAN framework. o Secondly, the aims of SHAMAN as a project must be conveyed clearly: specifically, that it is a kind of „proof-of-concept‟ project and is not intended to deliver a package of programs capable of being implemented by institutions. o Thirdly, it needs to be emphasised that the SHAMAN framework is not limited to text documents; it can be applied to materials of all kinds. However, the demonstrations relate to bodies of material that were actually available for use. o Fourthly, the existing presentation materials are capable of being adapted for use in training activities. o Finally, the target audiences will appreciate the possibility of online access to the demonstrator, which will need to have very great ease of access in order that people with diverse backgrounds are able to use it with equal facility. We believe that, overall, WP14 has met its aims and objectives in this demonstration and evaluation of ISP1. Valuable lessons have been learnt by all parties involved, which will be transferred to the evaluation of ISP2 in the coming months.

  • Effect of non-approval of proposals (6) Notwithstanding that under subclause (1) any proposals of the Company are approved by the Minister or determined by arbitration award, unless each and every such proposal and matter is so approved or determined by 31 October 1992 or by such extended date or period if any as the Company shall be granted pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement then the Minister may give to the Company 12 months notice of intention to determine this Agreement and unless before the expiration of the said 12 months period all the detailed proposals and matters are so approved or determined this Agreement shall cease and determine subject however to the provisions of Clause 35. Implementation of proposals

  • Manufacturer's Recommendations All work or materials shall be installed in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations and requirements. The Contractor shall obtain the manufacturer’s recommendations and requirements, for its use at the Site in executing the Work, copies of bulletins, circulars, catalogues, or other publications bearing the manufacturer’s titles, numbers, editions, dates, etc. If the manufacturer’s recommendations and requirements are not available, the Contractor shall request installation instructions from the Design Professional.

  • PROCEDURE FOR APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT 28. Acceptance of this Settlement Agreement shall be sought at a hearing of the Central Regional Council of the MFDA on a date agreed to by counsel for Staff and the Respondent.

  • JOINT SETTLEMENT RECOMMENDATION 2. Staff conducted an investigation of the Respondent’s activities. The investigation disclosed that the Respondent had engaged in activity for which the Respondent could be penalized on the exercise of the discretion of the Hearing Panel pursuant to s. 24.1 of By-law No. 1.

  • PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT 3. Promptly upon execution of this Stipulation, Lead Plaintiffs will move for preliminary approval of the Settlement, certification of the Settlement Class for settlement purposes only, and the scheduling of a hearing for consideration of final approval of the Settlement, which motion shall be unopposed by Defendants. Concurrently with the motion for preliminary approval, Lead Plaintiffs shall apply to the Court for, and Defendants shall agree to, entry of the Preliminary Approval Order, substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A. RELEASE OF CLAIMS

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.