No Substitutions Without Approval Sample Clauses

No Substitutions Without Approval. The ODR and the A/E may receive and consider the Contractor's request for substitution when the Contractor agrees to reimburse the Owner for review costs and satisfies 8.3.5.1, 8.3.5.2, and 8.3.5.3 in combination with one or more of the items in 8.3.5.4 through 8.3.5.11 of the following conditions, as determined by the Owner. If the Contractor does not satisfy these conditions, the ODR and A/E will return the request without action except to record noncompliance with these requirements. The Owner will not consider the request if the Contractor cannot provide the product or method because of failure to pursue the Work promptly or coordinate activities properly. 8.3.5.1 The Contract Documents do not require extensive revisions. 8.3.5.2 Proposed changes are in keeping with the general intent of the Contract Documents and the design intent of the A/E and do not result in an increase in cost to the Owner. 8.3.5.3 The request is timely, fully documented, and properly submitted. 8.3.5.4 The Contractor cannot provide the specified product, assembly or method of construction within the Contract Time. 8.3.5.5 The request directly relates to an "or-equal" clause or similar language in the Contract Documents. 8.3.5.6 The request directly relates to a "product design standard" or “performance standard” clause in the Contract Documents. 8.3.5.7 The requested substitution offers the Owner a substantial advantage in cost, time, energy conservation or other considerations, after deducting additional responsibilities the Owner must assume. 8.3.5.8 The specified product or method of construction cannot receive necessary approval by an authority having jurisdiction, and the ODR can approve the requested substitution. 8.3.5.9 The Contractor cannot provide the specified product, assembly or method of construction in a manner that is compatible with other materials and the Contractor certifies that the substitution will overcome the incompatibility . 8.3.5.10 The Contractor cannot coordinate the specified product, assembly or method of construction with other materials and the Contractor certifies it can coordinate the proposed substitution. 8.3.5.11 The specified product, assembly or method of construction cannot provide a warranty required by the Contract Documents and the Contractor certifies that the proposed substitution provides the required warranty.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
No Substitutions Without Approval. City and A/E may receive and consider Contractor’s request for substitution when Contractor agrees to reimburse City for review costs and satisfies the requirements of this section. If Contractor does not satisfy these conditions, City and A/E will return the request without action except to record noncompliance with these requirements. City will not consider the request if Contractor cannot provide the product or method because of failure to pursue the Work promptly or coordinate activities properly. Contractor’s request for a substitution may be considered by City and A/E when: 7.3.5.1 The Contract Documents do not require extensive revisions; and 7.3.5.2 Proposed changes are in keeping with the general intent of the Contract Documents and the design intent of A/E and do not result in an increase in cost to City; and 7.3.5.3 The request is timely, fully documented, properly submitted and one or more of the following apply: 7.3.5.3.1 Contractor cannot provide the specified product, assembly or method of construction within the Contract Time; 7.3.5.3.2 The request directly relates to an “or-equal” clause or similar language in the Contract Documents; 7.3.5.3.3 The request directly relates to a “product design standard” or “performance standard” clause in the Contract Documents; 7.3.5.3.4 The requested substitution offers City a substantial advantage in cost, time, energy conservation or other considerations, after deducting additional responsibilities City must assume; 7.3.5.3.5 The specified product or method of construction cannot receive necessary approval by an authority having jurisdiction, and City can approve the requested substitution; 7.3.5.3.6 Contractor cannot provide the specified product, assembly or method of construction in a manner that is compatible with other materials and where Contractor certifies that the substitution will overcome the incompatibility; 7.3.5.3.7 Contractor cannot coordinate the specified product, assembly or method of construction with other materials and where Contractor certifies they can coordinate the proposed substitution; or 7.3.5.3.8 The specified product, assembly or method of construction cannot provide a warranty required by the Contract Documents and where Contractor certifies that the proposed substitution provides the requiredwarranty. 7.3.5.3.9 The manufacture of the specified product has been removed from production due to cancellation or obsolescence.
No Substitutions Without Approval. Contractor may make substitutions only with the consent of the Owner, after evaluation and recommendation by the Design Professional and in accordance with a Change Order.
No Substitutions Without Approval. Owner and A/E may receive and consider Contractor’s request for substitution when Contractor agrees to reimburse Owner for review costs and satisfies the requirements of this section. If Contractor does not satisfy these conditions, Owner and A/E will return the request without action except to record noncompliance with these requirements. Owner will not consider the request if Contractor cannot provide the product or method because of failure to pursue the Work promptly or coordinate activities properly.
No Substitutions Without Approval. Owner and A/E may receive and consider Xxxxxxxxxx’s request for substitution when Contractor agrees to reimburse Owner for review costs and satisfies the requirements of this section. If Contractor does not satisfy these conditions, Owner and A/E will return the request without action except to record noncompliance with these requirements. Owner will not consider the request if Contractor cannot provide the product or method because of failure to pursue the Work promptly or coordinate activities properly.
No Substitutions Without Approval. The Contractor may make substitutions only with the written consent of the Owner, after evaluation and recommendation by the Architect/Engineer, and in accordance with a Change Order. If the Contractor has good reason for objecting to the use of a material, appliance, or method of construction as shown or specified, it shall register its objections with the Architect/Engineer in writing, sending a copy to the Owner; otherwise, it shall proceed with the work with the understanding that a satisfactory job is required.
No Substitutions Without Approval. The ODR and the AE may receive and consider the CM-at-Risk's request for substitution when the CM-at-Risk agrees to reimburse the Owner for review costs and if the request satisfies in 8.3.5.1, 8.3.5.2, and 8.3.5.3 in combination with one or more of the items in 8.3.5.4 through 8.3.5.11 of the following conditions, as determined by the Owner. If the CM-at-Risk does not satisfy these conditions, the ODR and AE will return the request without action except to record noncompliance with these requirements. The Owner will not consider the request if the CM-at-Risk cannot provide the product or method because of failure to pursue the Work promptly or coordinate activities properly. 8.3.5.1 The Contract Documents do not require extensive revisions. 8.3.5.2 Proposed changes are in keeping with the general intent of the Contract Documents and the design intent of the AE and do not result in an increase in cost to the Owner. 8.3.5.3 The request is timely, fully documented, and properly submitted. 8.3.5.4 The CM-at-Risk cannot provide the specified product, assembly or method of construction within the Contract Time. 8.3.5.5 The request directly relates to an "or-equal" clause or similar language in the Contract Documents. 8.3.5.6 The request directly relates to a "product design standard" or “performance standard” clause in the Contract Documents. 8.3.5.7 The requested substitution offers the Owner a substantial advantage in cost, time, energy conservation or other considerations, after deducting additional responsibilities the Owner must assume. 8.3.5.8 The specified product or method of construction cannot receive necessary approval by an authority having jurisdiction, and the ODR can approve the requested substitution. 8.3.5.9 The CM-at-Risk cannot provide the specified product, assembly or method of construction in a manner that is compatible with other materials and where the CM-at- Risk certifies that the substitution will overcome the incompatibility.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to No Substitutions Without Approval

  • Limitation on Transactions with Affiliates (a) The Company shall not, and shall not permit any Restricted Subsidiary to, directly or indirectly, enter into or conduct any transaction or series of related transactions (including the purchase, sale, lease or exchange of any property or the rendering of any service) with any Affiliate of the Company (an “Affiliate Transaction”) unless (i) the terms of such Affiliate Transaction are not materially less favorable to the Company or such Restricted Subsidiary, as the case may be, than those that could be obtained at the time in a transaction with a Person who is not such an Affiliate and (ii) if such Affiliate Transaction involves aggregate consideration in excess of $15.0 million, the terms of such Affiliate Transaction have been approved by a majority of the Disinterested Directors. For purposes of this Section 412(a), any Affiliate Transaction shall be deemed to have satisfied the requirements set forth in this Section 412(a) if (x) such Affiliate Transaction is approved by a majority of the Disinterested Directors or (y) in the event there are no Disinterested Directors, a fairness opinion is provided by a nationally recognized appraisal or investment banking firm with respect to such Affiliate Transaction. (b) The provisions of Section 412(a) shall not apply to: (i) any Restricted Payment Transaction, (1) the entering into, maintaining or performance of any employment contract, collective bargaining agreement, benefit plan, program or arrangement, related trust agreement or any other similar arrangement for or with any employee, officer or director heretofore or hereafter entered into in the ordinary course of business, including vacation, health, insurance, deferred compensation, severance, retirement, savings or other similar plans, programs or arrangements, (2) the payment of compensation, performance of indemnification or contribution obligations, or any issuance, grant or award of stock, options, other equity-related interests or other securities, to employees, officers or directors in the ordinary course of business, (3) the payment of reasonable fees to directors of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries (as determined in good faith by the Company or such Subsidiary), (4) any transaction with an officer or director in the ordinary course of business not involving more than $100,000 in any one case, or (5) Management Advances and payments in respect thereof, (iii) any transaction with the Company, any Restricted Subsidiary or any Receivables Entity, (iv) any transaction arising out of agreements or instruments in existence on the Issue Date, and any payments made pursuant thereto, (v) any transaction in the ordinary course of business on terms not materially less favorable to the Company or the relevant Restricted Subsidiary than those that could be obtained at the time in a transaction with a Person who is not an Affiliate of the Company, (vi) any transaction in the ordinary course of business, or approved by a majority of the Board of Directors, between the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary and any Affiliate of the Company controlled by the Company that is a joint venture or similar entity, (vii) the execution, delivery and performance of any Tax Sharing Agreement and any Management Agreements, including (1) payment to CDR or any Affiliate of CDR of a fee of up to $18.0 million plus out-of-pocket expenses in connection with the Transactions, and (2) payment to CDR or any Affiliate of CDR of fees of up to $2.0 million in any fiscal year, and fees in connection with any acquisition, merger, recapitalization or similar transaction as provided in any such Management Agreement, plus all out-of-pocket expenses incurred by CDR or any such Affiliate in connection with its performance of management consulting, monitoring, financial advisory or other services with respect to the Company and its Restricted Subsidiaries, and (viii) the Transactions, all transactions in connection therewith (including the financing thereof), and all fees and expenses paid or payable in connection with the Transactions.

  • Transactions with Affiliates Directly or indirectly enter into or permit to exist any material transaction with any Affiliate of Borrower, except for transactions that are in the ordinary course of Borrower’s business, upon fair and reasonable terms that are no less favorable to Borrower than would be obtained in an arm’s length transaction with a non-affiliated Person.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!