Notices of Violation. On or about April 29, 2021, September 10, 2021 and July 21, 2022, Xxxxxxx served Xxxxxx.xxx, Inc. and certain requisite public enforcement agencies with 60-Day Notices of Violation (notice), alleging that Xxxxxx.xxx, Inc. violated Proposition 65 when it failed to warn customers or consumers in California that the Products expose users to lead. To the best of the Parties’ knowledge, no public enforcer has commenced and is diligently prosecuting the allegations set forth in the notice. The Settling Entity understands that Xxxxxxx may need to issue a 60-Day Notice of Violation expressly naming the Settling Entity. To facilitate the issuance of such sixty-day letter, the Settling Entity agrees to certain conditions set forth below.
Notices of Violation. Except as otherwise disclosed to Purchaser in writing, as of the Effective Date, Seller has not received any written notice from any governmental authority claiming that any of the Properties is in material violation of any applicable law, code, rule, regulation, ordinance, license or permit (including, without limitation, any Environmental Law).
Notices of Violation. On or about February 5, March 11 and April 29, 2021, Xxxxxxx served Walmart Inc. and certain requisite public enforcement agencies with 60-Day Notices of Violation (notices), alleging that Walmart Inc. violated Proposition 65 when it failed to warn customers or consumers in California that the Products expose users to lead. To the best of the Parties’ knowledge, no public enforcer has commenced and is diligently prosecuting the allegations set forth in the notices.
Notices of Violation. Tenant, at its expense, and with diligence and dispatch, shall procure the cancellation or discharge of all notices of violation arising from or otherwise connected with Tenant’s Changes which shall be issued by any governmental, public, or quasi-public authority having or asserting jurisdiction. However, nothing herein contained shall prevent Tenant from contesting, in good faith and at its own expense, any such notice of violation, provided that Landlord’s rights hereunder are in no way compromised or diminished thereby.
Notices of Violation. As soon as Seller has knowledge or immediately upon receipt of written notice thereof, Seller shall provide Purchaser with written notice of any violation of any legal requirements or insurance requirements affecting the Property, any service of process relating to the Property or which affects Seller’s ability to perform its obligations under this Agreement, any complaints or allegations of default received from Tenant, the landowner under the Parking License or any other correspondence or notice received by Seller which has or has the potential to have a material adverse effect on the Property.
Notices of Violation. Seller has received no notice, and, to the Knowledge of Seller, there is no pending notice, of violation of any Legal Requirement, nor the pendency of any Proceeding, threatened or otherwise, which could prohibit, impede, delay or adversely effect the ability of Seller to effect the transactions contemplated in this Agreement.
Notices of Violation. From the Effective Date to the date of Closing, as soon as Contributor has knowledge or immediately upon receipt of written notice thereof, Contributor shall provide GIPLP with written notice of any violation of any legal requirements or insurance requirements affecting the Property, any service of process relating to the Property or which affects Contributor’s ability to perform its obligations under this Agreement, any complaints or allegations of default received from Tenant or any other correspondence or notice received by Contributor which has or has the potential to have a material adverse effect on the Property.
Notices of Violation. Seller shall promptly notify Purchaser in writing of, and shall promptly deliver to Purchaser a copy of any written notice Seller may receive, on or before the Closing, from any Governmental Authority, concerning a violation of laws at the Property that has not been previously disclosed to Purchaser.
Notices of Violation. On July 10, 2020, Xxxxx served Beadsmith and various public enforcement agencies with a document entitled “60-Day Notice of Violation” that provided public enforcers and the noticed entities with notice of alleged violations of Health & Safety Code § 25249.6 for failing to warn consumers of the presence of DEHP, a toxic chemical found in the Beadsmith plier and tool Covered Products (hereafter defined) sold in California (AG Notice 2020-01683). On January 29, 2021, Xxxxx served Beadsmith and various public enforcement agencies with a document entitled “Supplemental 60-Day Notice of Violation” that provided public enforcers and the noticed entities with notice of alleged violations of Health & Safety Code § 25249.6 for failing to warn consumers of the presence of Lead, a toxic chemical found in the brass craft gauge Covered Products (hereafter defined) sold in California (AG Notice 2021-00181). On March 10, 2021, Xxxxx served Beadsmith and various public enforcement agencies with a document entitled “Supplemental 60-Day Notice of Violation” that provided public enforcers and the noticed entities with notice of alleged violations of Health & Safety Code § 25249.6 for failing to warn consumers of the presence of DEHP, a toxic chemical found in the Beadsmith craft tool kit Covered Products (hereafter defined) sold in California (AG Notice 2021-00683). These July 10, 2020, January 29, 2021, and March 10, 2021 Notices of Violation from Davia to Beadsmith shall hereafter be collectively referred to as “Notices.” Beadsmith represents that, as of the date it executes this Agreement, it is not aware of any public enforcer that is diligently prosecuting a Proposition 65 enforcement action related to DEHP or Lead in the Covered Products, as identified in the Notices.
Notices of Violation. On or about August 8, 2020, October 30, 2020, April 29, 2021 and July 21, 2022, Xxxxxxx served Xxxxxx.xxx, Inc. and certain requisite public enforcement agencies with 60- Day Notices of Violation (notice), alleging that Xxxxxx.xxx, Inc. violated Proposition 65 when it failed to warn customers or consumers in California that the Products expose users to lead. To the best of the Parties’ knowledge, no public enforcer has commenced and is diligently prosecuting the allegations set forth in the notice.
