ODIP 3 report on impacts assessment Sample Clauses

ODIP 3 report on impacts assessment. Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx (IFREMER) reminded that the target of prototype 3 target is to merge together resources from the three regions and this prototype is more a regional and regional pilots status category oriented. There are many results based on different implementations. Three standards were identified as good for the conceptual approach of what should be described in terms of observations systems and observations. Also the implementation of a RESTful JSON approach might be more efficient and would facilitate the development of Web clients that will be used on top of these services and the drafted demonstration use case that was identified did not achieve yet that. The decided performance indicators allowed to consider that depending on the type of SOS service, there are two different approaches, one is to have one ncSOS service per file (or per single granule) and the other which is being developed now, is to have a SOS services on the collection level of data sets (52°North, oceanotron, sensorCloud are doing this). The identified implications for prototype 2 are the standardization of the profiles of the observation systems and the observations themselves and specifically the restful API profiles. At regional level the impact is that work needs to be done on the implementation of the standards, but it seems that big steps have done since last Workshop at Liverpool.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to ODIP 3 report on impacts assessment

  • ASSESSMENT REPORT Within 120 days following the general election held on November 2nd 2003, the returning officer of the munici- pality shall forward, in accordance with section 659.3 of the Act respecting elections and referendums in munici- palities (R.S.Q., c. E-2.2), an assessment report to the Chief Electoral Officer and the Minister setting out relevant ways to improve the trial and addressing, in particular, the following points : — the preparations for the election (choice of the new method of voting, communications plan, etc.) ; — the conduct of the advance poll and the poll ; — the cost of using the electronic voting system : – the cost of adapting election procedures ; – non-recurrent costs likely to be amortized ; – a comparison between the actual polling costs and the estimated polling costs using the new methods of voting and the projected cost of holding the general election on November 2nd 2003 using traditional methods ; — the number and duration of incidents during which voting was stopped, if any ; — the advantages and disadvantages of using the new method of voting ; — the results obtained during the addition of the votes and the correspondence between the number of ballot paper cards issued to the deputy returning officers and the number of ballot paper cards returned used and unused ; — the examination of rejected ballot papers, if it has been completed.

  • Self-Assessment (a) Subject to clause 4.4(b), for Services that are Self-Assessable:

  • Loss Assessment We will pay up to $1000 for your share of loss assessment charged during the policy period against you by a corporation or as- sociation of property owners, when the assess- ment is made as a result of:

  • Impact Assessment If Service Provider desires to make any change, upgrade, replacement or addition that may have an adverse impact or require changes as described in Section 9.6(c) or increase the risk of Service Provider not being able to provide the Services in accordance with this Agreement or violate or be inconsistent with DIR Standards or Strategic Plans, then Service Provider shall prepare a written risk assessment and mitigation plan (1) describing in detail the nature and extent of such adverse impact or risk, (2) describing any benefits, savings or risks to DIR or the DIR Customers associated with such change, and (3) proposing strategies to mitigate any adverse risks or impacts associated with such change and, after consultation and agreement with DIR, implement the plan.

  • Risk Assessment An assessment of any risks inherent in the work requirements and actions to mitigate these risks.

  • Single Audit Report A. The parties shall comply with the requirements of the Single Audit Act of 1984, P.L. 98-502, ensuring that the single audit report includes the coverage stipulated in 2 CFR 200.

  • Review of assessment The assessment of the applicable percentage should be subject to annual review or earlier on the basis of a reasonable request for such a review. The process of review shall be in accordance with the procedures for assessing capacity under the Supported Wage System.

  • Environmental Assessment and Mitigation Development of a transportation project must comply with applicable environmental laws. The party named in article 1, Responsible Parties, under AGREEMENT is responsible for the following:

  • Evaluation Cycle: Formative Assessment A) A specific purpose for evaluation is to promote student learning, growth and achievement by providing Educators with feedback for improvement. Evaluators are expected to make frequent unannounced visits to classrooms. Evaluators are expected to give targeted constructive feedback to Educators based on their observations of practice, examination of artifacts, and analysis of multiple measures of student learning, growth and achievement in relation to the Standards and Indicators of Effective Teaching Practice.

  • Screening and Assessment Grantee shall:

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!