ASSESSMENT REPORT. Within 120 days following the referendum held on October 26th, 2003, the clerk or secretary-treasurer of the municipality shall forward, in accordance with section 659.3 of the Act respecting elections and refer- endums in municipalities (R.S.Q., c. E-2.2), an assessment report to the Chief Electoral Officer and the Minister setting out the points required to improve testing of a new voting method, including the following : — the preparations for the referendum (choice of the new method of voting, communications plan, etc.) ; — the conduct of the advance poll and the poll ; — the cost of using the electronic voting system : – the cost of adapting referendum procedures ; – non-recurrent costs likely to be amortized ; – a comparison between the actual polling costs and the estimated polling costs using the new methods of voting and the projected cost of holding the referendum of October 26th, 2003 using traditional methods ; — the number and duration of incidents during which voting was stopped, if any ; — the advantages and disadvantages of using the new method of voting ; — the results obtained during the addition of the votes and the correspondence between the number of ballot paper cards issued to the deputy returning officers and the number of ballot paper cards returned used and unused ; — the examination of rejected ballot papers, if it has been completed.
ASSESSMENT REPORT. Within 120 days following the general election held on November 3rd 2002, the returning officer of the munici- pality shall forward, in accordance with section 659.3 of the Act respecting elections and referendums in munici- palities (R.S.Q., c. E-2.2), an assessment report to the Chief Electoral Officer and the Minister addressing, in particular, the following issues : — the preparations for the election (choice of the new method of voting, communications plan, etc.) ; — the conduct of the advance poll and the poll ; — the cost of using the electronic voting system : – the cost of adapting election procedures ; – non-recurrent costs likely to be amortized ; – a comparison between the actual polling costs and the estimated polling costs using the new methods of voting and the projected cost of holding the general election on November 3rd 2002 using traditional methods ; — the number and duration of incidents during which voting was stopped, if any ; — the advantages and disadvantages of using the new method of voting ; — the results obtained during the addition of the votes and the correspondence between the number of votes cast and the number of electors admitted to vote.
ASSESSMENT REPORT. A report of the results of student assessments of a Faculty Member shall be transmitted to the Faculty Member and, except for those covered under Subdivision 3.26, entered in the Faculty Member’s evaluation file. The individual student assessment response sheets shall be considered as part of the evaluation file.
ASSESSMENT REPORT. Within 120 days following the municipal election held on 3rd November 2002 the returning officer of the municipality shall forward, in accordance with section 659.3 of the Act respecting elections and referendums in municipalities (R.S.Q., c. E-2.2), an assessment report to the Chief Electoral Officer and the Minister address- ing, in particular, the following issues : — the preparations for the election (choice of the new method of voting, communications plan, etc.) ; — the conduct of the advance poll and the poll ; — the cost of using the electronic voting system : – the cost of adapting election procedures ; – non-recurrent costs likely to be amortized ; – a comparison between the actual polling costs and the estimated polling costs using the new methods of voting and the projected cost of holding the municipal election on 3rd November 2002 using traditional methods ; — the number and duration of incidents during which voting was stopped, if any ; — the advantages and disadvantages of using the new method of voting ; — the results obtained during the addition of the votes and the correspondence between the number of votes cast and the number of electors admitted to vote.
ASSESSMENT REPORT. THE CONTRACTOR will present XXX a full report of the results of the Assessment Program within the three (3) months following the date of its termination. Said report will include at least: a geologic description of the Discovery and its structural configuration; the physical properties of the rocks and fluids present in the fields associated to the Discovery; the pressure, volume and analysis of the field fluids temperature; the production capacity (per well and for the entire Discovery); and an estimate of the recoverable reserves of hydrocarbons.
Paragraph 1: If THE CONTRACTOR includes the drilling of Exploration Xxxxx in the Assessment programs undertaken during the Exploration Period, it may credit both compliance of the Exploration Program as well as corresponding Assessment Program by drilling two (2) Exploration Xxxxx, provided that the same type of Exploration Well is contemplated in the phase of the Exploration Program immediately following the beginning of the Assessment Program and drilling concludes prior to the date of termination of the Assessment Program in which they were included or the phase of the Exploration Program to which said xxxxx correspond, whichever is closest. In this case, THE CONTRACTOR will return XXX the portion of the Contract Area in which no exploration activities will be undertaken during the time remaining in the Exploration Period.
Paragraph 2: In case the discovery of Non Associated Natural Gas or Heavy Liquid Hydrocarbons or Non Conventional Hydrocarbons, and at any time during the second half of the Assessment Period, THE CONTRACTOR may request XXX an extension of the Assessment Program for up to two (2) additional years; this term may be extended at ANH’s criteria, with the purpose of undertaking feasibility studies to build infrastructure, with regards to production methods and/ or market development. In these cases, the request will include in the Assessment Program, the information related to the feasibility studies that THE CONTRACTOR considers necessary to undertake. At the end of the extension granted, THE CONTRACTOR will provide XXX the conclusions and recommendations of the feasibility studies.
Paragraph 3: This clause only applies to discovering Exploration Xxxxx drilled by THE CONTRACTOR outside of the areas designated as Assessment or Production. Consequently, when new volumes of Hydrocarbons found are part of one same Assessment or production Area, there will be no new Assessment Period.
ASSESSMENT REPORT. Within 120 days following the general election held on November 2nd, 2003, the returning officer of the munici- pality shall forward, in accordance with section 659.3 of the Act respecting elections and referendums in munici- palities (R.S.Q., c. E-2.2), an assessment report to the Chief Electoral Officer and the Minister addressing, in particular, the following issues : — the preparations for the election (choice of the new method of voting, communications plan, etc.) ; — the conduct of the advance poll and the poll ; — the cost of using the electronic voting system : – the cost of adapting election procedures ; – non-recurrent costs likely to be amortized ; –a comparison between the actual polling costs and the estimated polling costs using the new methods of voting and the projected cost of holding the general election on November 2nd, 2003 using traditional methods ; — the number and duration of incidents during which voting was stopped, if any ; — the advantages and disadvantages of using the new method of voting, including the addition of a photograph on the graphical representation of a ballot paper placed on the voting terminal ; — the results obtained during the addition of the votes and the correspondence between the number of votes cast and the number of electors admitted to vote.
ASSESSMENT REPORT. The assessment report is the outcome of the work of the review team and the accreditation organizations will make their decisions based upon the information in this report. NVAO and AACSB do accept a joint report, however, for the purpose of consistency, AACSB does require that the team follows the AACSB prescribed reporting outline. This report may include specific NVAO sections, as long as this is clearly indicated, and the report enables both boards/committees to make a substantiated decision. In the case of a joint team report all topics (standards) from both frameworks should be discussed. The NVAO grants accreditation per program. Therefore, the report needs to state a judgment per program. Furthermore, the NVAO assessment framework prescribes the need for a judgment per standard (meets the standard, partially meets the standard, or does not meet the standard) and per programme (positive, conditionally positive, negative). For NVAO to decide on accreditation the panel needs to state and motivate these judgments in the report. In addition, a substantive summary of the report needs to be added to the report. It is important to note that the reports used by the NVAO as the basis for its decision, are published on the NVAO website for any stakeholder to access and read. At least all sections of the report regarding NVAO standards, will be published. A format for this report will be provided. Institutions agree to the publication of the assessment report when opting for the joint process.
ASSESSMENT REPORT. Within 120 days following the election of the warden of RCM of “Basques” held on November 3th of the year 2002, the returning officer shall forward, in accordance with section 659.3 of the Act respecting elections and referendums in municipalities (R.S.Q., c. E-2.2), an assessment report to the chief electoral officer and to the Minister addressing relevant aspects for improving the testing of the new method of voting, such as : — the preparations for the election (choice of the new method of voting, communications plan, etc.) ; — the conduct of the poll ; — the cost of using voting by mail : – the cost of adapting election procedures ; – non-recurrent costs likely to be amortized ; – a comparison between the actual polling costs and the estimated polling costs using the new methods of voting and, where applicable, the planned costs for the traditional election of the warden of RCM of “Basques” held on November 3th of the year 2002 ; — the advantages and disadvantages of using the new method of voting.
ASSESSMENT REPORT. An Assessment Report must be prepared by the relevant Victorian Minister which takes into account: the Information in the Assessment Documentation; and any other Information relating to relevant impacts that is available to the relevant Victorian Minister. Specified manner of assessment – Item 2.1(d) (Planning and Environment Xxx 0000 (Vic)) Any controlled action subject to this Agreement and assessed using the assessment approach specified at Item 2.1(d) of this Schedule must be subject to the following requirements. Prior to any hearing being conducted by persons appointed by the Victorian Minister as an advisory committee (Advisory Committee) under section 151 of the Planning and Environment Xxx 0000 (see Item 6.3(a)) in respect of the action, the proponent of the action is to prepare assessment documentation that describes: the proposed action; the likely relevant impacts of the action, as defined in section 82 of the EPBC Act, and includes an assessment of those impacts; to the extent practicable, any feasible alternatives to the proposed action that could avoid or reduce relevant impacts; and possible mitigation measures. Once prepared by the proponent to the satisfaction of the relevant Victorian Minister, the assessment document must be released for public comment for at least 28 calendar days. When the public is invited to comment on the assessment document the invitation must: be published in a newspaper circulating generally in each State and Territory; and include the matters specified in Schedule 1, Item 7.04 of the EPBC Regulations. The proponent of the action being assessed must be provided with any submissions made by the public during the period that the assessment document is released for public comment. The proponent is to provide the Advisory Committee with a written response to submissions from the public that relate to relevant impacts. Persons are to be appointed by the Victorian Minister as an advisory committee under section 151 of the Planning and Environment Xxx 0000. The persons appointed as the Advisory Committee are to be independent and to have sufficient power to investigate the action adequately. The Advisory Committee is to consider the action in accordance with terms of reference provided by the Victorian Minister that will ensure that it: conducts a formal public hearing in relation to the action; assesses all relevant impacts of the action, as defined in section 82 of the EPBC Act, and includes an assessment of those im...
ASSESSMENT REPORT. An Assessment Report must be prepared by the relevant Victorian Minister which takes into account: the Information in the Assessment Documentation; and any other Information relating to relevant impacts that is available to the relevant Victorian Minister. Specified manner of assessment – Item 2.1(g) (Environment Protection Xxx 0000 (Vic)) Any controlled action subject to this Agreement and assessed using the assessment approach specified at Item 2.1(g) of this Schedule must be subject to the following requirements. An application for works approval under section 19B of the Environment Protection Act 1970 (Vic) is to include or be combined with relevant supporting documentation that describes: the proposed action; the likely relevant impacts of the action, as defined in section 82 of the EPBC Act, and includes an assessment of those impacts; to the extent practicable, any feasible alternatives to the proposed action that could avoid or reduce relevant impacts; and possible mitigation measures. Once prepared by the proponent to the satisfaction of the Environment Protection Authority constituted under the Environment Protection Act 1970 (Vic), the application and relevant supporting documentation must be released for public comment for at least 21 calendar days. When the public is invited to comment, the invitation must: include the matters specified in Schedule 1, Item 7.04 of the EPBC Regulations; and be published on a website approved by the Environment Protection Authority and linked to the Department’s website; or be advertised in newspapers circulating generally in each State and Territory. Prior to submitting final Assessment Documentation to the Environment Protection Authority, the proponent must have been provided with any submissions made by the public during the period that the application and relevant supporting documentation is released for public comment. The proponent must provide the Environment Protection Authority with final Assessment Documentation that: includes an assessment of the relevant impacts of the action as defined in section 82 of the EPBC Act; and summarises, or takes into account, the issues raised by the public in response to the invitation for public comment described in Item 9.2 of this Schedule 1.
