Operational Negligence Sample Clauses

Operational Negligence. 95. 122. At the material times, the DefendantsNorthwood Halifax owed a duty of care to Residents to take reasonable care, and implement reasonable practices, policies and procedures, to prevent the spread of COVID-19 within the Long-Term Care Facility that houses the Residents, who are vulnerable and elderly. The DefendantsNorthwood Halifax breached the requisite standard of care by acting negligently, and/or failing to act at all, in the face of a global pandemic, spread through human-to- human contact, with potentially lethal complications for elderly persons. Such negligence includes, but is not limited to, the following: a. the DefendantsNorthwood Halifax chose not to exercise reasonable care in implementing practices, procedures, and/or policies to prevent and/or control the spread of COVID-19 in the Long-Term Care Facility; b. the DefendantsNorthwood Halifax did not take all reasonable and necessary steps to mitigate and/or control the risks posed by the design of their Long-Term Care Facility, including its shared private and communal spaces and its crowded nature; c. the DefendantsNorthwood Halifax did not require, enforce or facilitate adequate physical distancing or quarantine measures in a timely manner, or at all; d. the DefendantsNorthwood Halifax chose not to restrict visitors, shipments, or dangerous person-to-person contact, including the known shared use of personal care items and an ice machine, in a timely and adequate manner, or at all; e. the DefendantsNorthwood Halifax did not adequately limit or otherwise control staff members’ and Residents’ travel between different areas of the Long-Term Care Facility, in a timely and adequate manner; f. the DefendantsNorthwood Halifax chose not to administer sufficient COVID-19 testing in the Facility;
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Operational Negligence. The Province breached its duty of care to Residents through its negligent regulation, oversight and control of the Facility. 140. At material times hereto, the Province had made the decision to, and had assumed responsibility for, funding a significant portion of the costs incurred in the operation of the Long-Term Care Facility. The Province thus had a duty to have a reasonable funding scheme, based on the number of residents, known accommodation space and issues, the condition of the Long-Term Care Facility and other factors indicating need. The Province further owed the residents of the Long-Term Care Facility a duty to maintain adequate and reasonable funding of the Long-Term Care Facility to ensure its safe operation and to refrain from sudden, arbitrary reductions in funding that posed a known risk to the health and safety of vulnerable elderly persons residing in the Facility. 141. It is reasonably foreseeable that a failure to adhere to the standard of care could cause significant harm to the Residents, Plaintiff and Class. 142. Particulars of the operational negligence of the Province include, but are not limited to, the following:

Related to Operational Negligence

  • Express Negligence THE PARTIES INTEND THAT THE INDEMNITIES SET FORTH IN THIS ARTICLE 8 BE CONSTRUED AND APPLIED AS WRITTEN ABOVE, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY RULE OF CONSTRUCTION TO THE CONTRARY. WITHOUT LIMITING THE FOREGOING, SUCH INDEMNITIES WILL APPLY NOTWITHSTANDING ANY STATE’S “EXPRESS NEGLIGENCE” OR SIMILAR RULE THAT WOULD DENY COVERAGE BASED ON AN INDEMNIFIED PARTY’S SOLE OR CONCURRENT, ACTIVE OR PASSIVE NEGLIGENCE OR GROSS NEGLIGENCE. IT IS THE INTENT OF THE PARTIES THAT, TO THE EXTENT PROVIDED ABOVE, THE INDEMNITIES SET FORTH IN THIS ARTICLE 8 WILL APPLY TO AN INDEMNIFIED PARTY’S SOLE OR CONCURRENT, ACTIVE OR PASSIVE NEGLIGENCE OR GROSS NEGLIGENCE. THE PARTIES AGREE THAT THIS PROVISION IS “CONSPICUOUS” FOR PURPOSES OF ALL STATE LAWS.

  • Negligence We will only be liable for the proportion to which the loss or damage to the Goods is caused by or contributed to by Our negligence (including the negligence of any Subcontractor, but excluding the negligence of any Third Party Provider), and in any event that liability will be limited to $100 per item or package, or $1,000 in respect of all Goods moved or stored under this agreement (whichever is the lesser).

  • Misconduct Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, the Options shall terminate in their entirety, regardless of whether the Options are vested, immediately upon Optionee’s discharge of employment or other service relationship for Cause or upon Optionee’s commission of any of the following acts during any period following the cessation of Optionee’s employment or other service relationship during which the Options otherwise would be exercisable: (i) fraud on or misappropriation of any funds or property of the Corporation, or (ii) breach by Optionee of any provision of any employment, non-disclosure, non-competition, non-solicitation, assignment of inventions, or other similar agreement executed by Optionee for the benefit of the Company, as determined by the Administrator, which determination will be conclusive.

  • No Liability for Ordinary Negligence Neither Silicon, nor any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, attorneys or any other Person affiliated with or representing Silicon shall be liable for any claims, demands, losses or damages, of any kind whatsoever, made, claimed, incurred or suffered by Borrower or any other party through the ordinary negligence of Silicon, or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, attorneys or any other Person affiliated with or representing Silicon, but nothing herein shall relieve Silicon from liability for its own gross negligence or willful misconduct.

  • Negligent or Willful Damage Un- designated timber meeting Utilization Standards and un- necessarily damaged or negligently or willfully cut by Pur- chaser, if included by Contracting Officer.

  • Reporting of Abuse, Neglect, or Exploitation Consistent with provisions of 33 V.S.A. §4913(a) and §6903, Party and any of its agents or employees who, in the performance of services connected with this agreement, (a) is a caregiver or has any other contact with clients and (b) has reasonable cause to believe that a child or vulnerable adult has been abused or neglected as defined in Chapter 49 or abused, neglected, or exploited as defined in Chapter 69 of Title 33 V.S.A. shall: as to children, make a report containing the information required by 33 V.S.A. §4914 to the Commissioner of the Department for Children and Families within 24 hours; or, as to a vulnerable adult, make a report containing the information required by 33 V.S.A. §6904 to the Division of Licensing and Protection at the Department of Disabilities, Aging, and Independent Living within 48 hours. Party will ensure that its agents or employees receive training on the reporting of abuse or neglect to children and abuse, neglect or exploitation of vulnerable adults.

  • Lobbying Activities - Standard Form - LLL No response Do not upload this form unless Vendor has reportable lobbying activities. There are Attributes entitled, “2 CFR Part 200 or Federal Provision - Xxxx Anti-Lobbying Amendment – Continued.” Properly respond to those Attributes and only upload this form if applicable/instructed. If upload is required based on your response to those Attributes, the Disclosure of Lobbying Activities – Standard Form - LLL must be downloaded from the “Attachments” section of the IonWave eBid System, reviewed, properly completed, and uploaded to this location.

  • Professional Responsibility 19.01 The parties agree that resident care is enhanced if concerns relating to professional practice and workload are resolved in a timely and effective manner, as set out below; In the event that the Home assigns a number of residents or a workload to an individual employee or group of employees, such that she or they have cause to believe that she or they are being asked to perform more work than is consistent with proper resident care, she or they shall: i) At the time the workload issue occurs, discuss the issue within the Home to develop strategies to meet resident care needs using current resources. If necessary, using established lines of communication, seek immediate assistance from an individual(s) identified by the Home who has responsibility for timely resolution of workload issues. ii) Failing resolution at the time of occurrence of the workload issue, complain in writing to the Union-Management Committee within twenty (20) calendar days of the alleged improper assignment. The chairperson of the Union-Management Committee shall convene a meeting of the Union-Management Committee within twenty (20) calendar days of the filing of the complaint. The Union-Management Committee shall hear and attempt to resolve the complaint to the satisfaction of both parties. The Employer will provide a written response to the Union, with a copy to the ONA representation within ten (10) calendar days. iii) Prior to the complaint being forwarded to the Independent Assessment Committee, the Union may forward a written report outlining the complaint and recommendations to the Director of Resident Care and/or the Administrator. iv) At any time during this process, the parties may agree to the use of a mediator to assist in the resolution of the Professional Practice issues. v) Any settlement arrived at under 19.01 (a) i) – iii) shall be signed by the parties. vi) Failing resolution of the complaint within twenty (20) calendar days of the meeting of the Union-Management Committee, the complaint shall be forwarded to an independent Assessment Committee composed of three (3) registered nurses; one chosen by the Ontario Nurses' Association, one chosen by the Home and one chosen from a panel of independent registered nurses who are well respected within the profession. The member of the Committee chosen from the panel of independent registered nurses shall act as Chairperson. vii) The Independent Assessment Committee shall set a date to conduct a hearing into the complaint, within twenty (20) calendar days of its appointment, and shall be empowered to investigate as is necessary to properly assess the merits of the complaint. The Independent Assessment Committee shall report its findings, in writing, to the parties within twenty (20) calendar days following completion of its hearing. (b) i) The list of Independent Assessment Committee Chairpersons is attached as Appendix “B”. The members of the panel shall sit in rotation as agreed by the parties. If a panel member is unable to sit within the time limit stipulated, the panel member next scheduled to sit will be appointed by the parties.

  • Conducts activities regulated by (a) a Board member, or (b) an employee or by the Board member or another employee directing that employee;

  • Negligent Fire A “Negligent Fire” is a fire caused by negligence or fault of Purchaser’s Opera- tions, including, but not limited to, one caused by smoking by persons engaged in Purchaser’s Operations during the course of their employment, or during rest or lunch peri- ods; or if Purchaser’s failure to comply with the require- ments of BT7.2 and BT7.3 results in a fire starting or permits a fire to spread. Damages and the cost of sup- pressing Negligent Fires shall be borne by Purchaser.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!