Option Pricing Theory Sample Clauses

Option Pricing Theory. The option pricing theory developed by Black, Scholes(1973), and Xxxxxx(1973), for pricing financial derivatives is the building block of the RCP option pricing approach in this paper. The concept of option pricing theory in finance was imported to seek to value managerial flexibilities on real assets or properties. The option pricing theory is based on the assumption that the stock price follows an uncertain diffusion process of a log-normal distribution called a ‘Geometric Brownian Motion' proven to appropriately model the price of an asymmetric payoff of financial securities(Black and Scholes. 1973; Xxxxxxxxxx. 1998). The uncertainty of the value of real asset is reasonably reflected through this diffusion process(Xxxxxxx and Xxxxxxxx. 1978; Xxxxx and Pindyck. 1994). Equation<4> describes the diffusion process of Geometric Brownian motion process in a capital market:  dS  u dt + σ dx <4> S Where, S is stock price, u is instantaneous rate of return, σ is instantaneous standard deviation of rate of return, and dx is random increment to a standard wiener process. In the option pricing theory, which falls into two folds; Black-Scholes model(continuous-time approach) and Binomial model(discrete-time approach), the value of a European call option can be obtained by solving the partial differential equation derived by Black and Scholes(1973), subject to one terminal and two boundary conditions(Jun and Xxx. 2009). This Black-Scholes equation is based on the complex mathematical process and that is why the Black-Scholes equation is analytically limited in modeling and calculating the option. For this reason, it has been necessary to use a numerical solution such as the binomial model that this paper follows(Cox et al. 1979). Recently, we can see there have been more efforts to evaluate real assets based on the option pricing theory.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Option Pricing Theory

  • Alternate or Supplemental Pricing Documents No response Optional. If when completing Pricing Form 1 & Pricing Form 2 you direct TIPS to view additional, alternate, or supplemental pricing documentation, you may upload that documentation.

  • Payment of Fee The cash management fee referred to in Clause 9.1 (Fee Payable) shall only be payable to the Current Issuer Cash Manager on each Payment Date in the manner contemplated by, in accordance with and subject to the provisions of the Current Issuer Pre-Enforcement Revenue Priority of Payments or, as the case may be, the Current Issuer Post-Enforcement Priority of Payments.

  • Payment of Fees and Expenses Borrower shall have paid to Lender all fees, charges, and other expenses which are then due and payable as specified in this Agreement or any Related Document.

  • NEGOTIATION OF A SUBSEQUENT AGREEMENT The parties agree to commence negotiations for a new collective agreement to succeed this Agreement at least 3 months before the nominal expiry date. The parties intend to conclude these negotiations prior to the nominal expiry date. These negotiations shall be conducted on a collective basis between the parties with the negotiated outcome being subject to approval of a vote of the employees collectively.

  • Contract Renegotiation, Suspension, or Termination Due to Change in Funding If the funds DSHS relied upon to establish this Contract or Program Agreement are withdrawn, reduced or limited, or if additional or modified conditions are placed on such funding, after the effective date of this contract but prior to the normal completion of this Contract or Program Agreement:

  • Exceptions and Extension of Payment Due Date NYSERDA has determined that, notwithstanding the provisions of Sections 504.3 and 504.4 of this Exhibit, any of the following facts or circumstances, which may occur concurrently or consecutively, reasonably justify extension of the Payment Due Date:

  • Payment of Fees All fees payable hereunder shall be paid on the dates due, in immediately available funds, to the Administrative Agent (or to the Issuing Lender, in the case of fees payable to it) for distribution, in the case of commitment fees and participation fees, to the Lenders entitled thereto. Fees paid shall not be refundable under any circumstances.

  • Sale of Note; Change of Loan Servicer; Notice of Grievance The Note or a partial interest in the Note (together with this Security Instrument) can be sold one or more times without prior notice to Borrower. A sale might result in a change in the entity (known as the “Loan Servicer”) that collects Periodic Payments due under the Note and this Security Instrument and performs other mortgage loan servicing obligations under the Note, this Security Instrument, and Applicable Law. There also might be one or more changes of the Loan Servicer unrelated to a sale of the Note. If there is a change of the Loan Servicer, Borrower will be given written notice of the change which will state the name and address of the new Loan Servicer, the address to which payments should be made and any other information RESPA requires in connection with a notice of transfer of servicing. If the Note is sold and thereafter the Loan is serviced by a Loan Servicer other than the purchaser of the Note, the mortgage loan servicing obligations to Borrower will remain with the Loan Servicer or be transferred to a successor Loan Servicer and are not assumed by the Note purchaser unless otherwise provided by the Note purchaser. Neither Borrower nor Lender may commence, join, or be joined to any judicial action (as either an individual litigant or the member of a class) that arises from the other party’s actions pursuant to this Security Instrument or that alleges that the other party has breached any provision of, or any duty owed by reason of, this Security Instrument, until such Borrower or Lender has notified the other party (with such notice given in compliance with the requirements of Section 15) of such alleged breach and afforded the other party hereto a reasonable period after the giving of such notice to take corrective action. If Applicable Law provides a time period which must elapse before certain action can be taken, that time period will be deemed to be reasonable for purposes of this paragraph. The notice of acceleration and opportunity to cure given to Borrower pursuant to Section 22 and the notice of acceleration given to Borrower pursuant to Section 18 shall be deemed to satisfy the notice and opportunity to take corrective action provisions of this Section 20.

  • Deadlines for Providing Insurance Documents after Renewal or Upon Request As set forth herein, certain insurance documents must be provided to the OGS Procurement Services contact identified in the Contract Award Notice after renewal or upon request. This requirement means that the Contractor shall provide the applicable insurance document to OGS as soon as possible but in no event later than the following time periods:  For certificates of insurance: 5 business days  For information on self-insurance or self-retention programs: 15 calendar days  For other requested documentation evidencing coverage: 15 calendar days  For additional insured and waiver of subrogation endorsements: 30 calendar days Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Contractor shall have promptly requested the insurance documents from its broker or insurer and shall have thereafter diligently taken all steps necessary to obtain such documents from its insurer and submit them to OGS, OGS shall extend the time period for a reasonable period under the circumstances, but in no event shall the extension exceed 30 calendar days.

  • OVERPAYMENT OF PURCHASES OR UNDERPAYMENT OF FEES Without limiting any other remedy available to any Purchaser, Contractor shall (a) reimburse Purchasers for any overpayments inconsistent with the terms of this Master Contract or Purchase Orders placed thereunder, at a rate of 125% of any such overpayments, found as a result of the examination of Contractor’s records; and (b) reimburse Enterprise Services for any underpayment of vendor management fees, at a rate of 125% of such fees found as a result of the examination of Contractor’s records (e.g., if Contractor underpays the Vendor Management Fee by $500, Contractor would be required to pay to Enterprise Services $500 x 1.25 = $625); Provided, however, that, in the event Contractor timely discovers and corrects any Purchaser overpayment or Contractor underpayment of vendor management fees and does so prior to the initiation of any audit, Contractor shall be entitled to reimburse Purchaser or pay to Enterprise Services the actual amount of such Purchaser overpayment or such underpayment of vendor management fees.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.