Past Performance. The Government will evaluate the contractor's performance on the NETCENTS-2 Orders provided in Exhibit B, CDRL B001. The PCO will determine the quality of the work performed based on an integrated assessment of data obtained in the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting Systems (CPARS) and information obtained from Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) channels, interviews with customers, program managers and/or contracting officers for NETCENTS-2 task orders. Based on the contractor performance records above, the PCO will determine if there is an expectation that the contractor will successfully perform the required efforts under the unrestricted NetOps and Infrastructure Solutions contract.
Past Performance. Past performance information is relevant information, for future source selection purposes, regarding a Contractor’s actions under a previously awarded contracts. It includes, for example, the Contractor’s record of conforming to contract requirements and to standards of good workmanship; record of forecasting and controlling costs; adherence to contract schedules, including the administrative aspects of performance; history of reasonable and cooperative behavior and commitment to customer satisfaction; reporting into required databases; record of integrity and business ethics; and, business-like concern for the interest of the customer. The OASIS Program Office requires use of the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) modules as the secure, confidential, information management tool to facilitate the performance evaluation process for task orders awarded under OASIS SB. However, if a customer agency requires an alternative past performance assessment reporting system for a specific task order(s) other than CPARS, the alternative reporting system takes precedence over CPARS. The COCM will serve as a primary contact and who will be authorized access to the evaluation for review and comment for OASIS SB and task orders awarded under OASIS SB. The COCM shall respond promptly to past performance evaluations as documented by the OCO at the task order level and the OASIS SB CO for OASIS SB. In addition, the COCM will be required to identify an alternate contact that will be responsible for notifying the OASIS SB CO in the event the primary contact is unavailable to process evaluations within the required 30-day time frame.
Past Performance. You understand that even if we have been successful with other projects, we might not be successful with this project.
Past Performance. The second criteria examined will be the past performances of the candidates. Both the District and the Association agree to review and revise the evaluation criteria so that clear delineation can be made on the past performances of bargaining unit members.
Past Performance a) Past Performance will be evaluated to establish a Performance Confidence Assessment Rating that will reflect the Government’s confidence that the offeror will successfully perform the requirements of the solicitation, based upon the prime and principal subcontractor’s (if proposed) recent and relevant past and present performance record.
b) The Government will evaluate a maximum of five (5) most relevant government or commercial past performance contract references of the prime and principal subcontractors’ recent and relevant past performance. Up to three (3) of the five (5) most relevant government or commercial past performance contract references may be from principal subcontractors, with a maximum of two (2) references provided for a single principal subcontractor.
c) There are two aspects to the past performance evaluation: Relevancy, and Demonstrated Past Performance. An initial consideration in determining the relevancy of a past performance record involves Recency. Recency is expressed as a time period during which past performance references are considered relevant, and is critical to establishing the relevancy of past performance information. A recency determination will be made for each offeror’s past performance submission. A determination of Recent will be assigned to offerors’ submissions which contain performance within five (5) years of the RFP issuance date. A determination of Not Recent will be assigned to offer submissions which do not contain performance within five (5) years of the RFP issuance date, or for which the Past Performance record’s award date cannot be determined, and the submission will not be evaluated or rated. Only submissions meeting the parameters established in this RFP will be evaluated to receive a Relevance or Past Performance Confidence rating. In general, more recent performance will be considered more relevant than less recent performance.
d) The Performance Confidence Assessment Ratings are set forth in Section M Part C 3.0. As part of the assessment, the government may also take into account any show cause notices, cure notices and terminations for default that are deemed relevant to this solicitation’s effort.
e) In assigning a Performance Confidence Assessment Rating and/or in the selection official’s tradeoff decision: past performance contract references of an entity performing as a prime contractor will be considered more significant than a past performance effort of the entity performing as a subco...
Past Performance. At NYSERDA’s discretion, an employee of a Participating Contractor who has demonstrated unprofessionalism, unethical behavior or has exhibited poor workmanship on one or more past Program projects may be prohibited from working on Program projects. This includes any staff member associated with a former Participating Contractor who was under suspension or terminated from the Program, or any other NYSERDA program. NYSERDA will notify the Participating Contractor of any individuals prohibited from working on Program projects and these individuals will continue to be prohibited from working on Program projects unless written consent is provided by NYSERDA.
Past Performance. The historic performance of the Sub-Fund (including Unit Classes), once available, shall be published on the website of the LAFV (Liechtensteinischer Anlagefondsverband) (xxx.xxxx.xx). Past performance is not a guarantee or indication of present and/or future performance.
Past Performance. You understand that even if affiliates of the Company have been successful in the past, this doesn’t mean the Company will be successful.
Past Performance. The past performance evaluation will assess the offeror’s probability of meeting the solicitation requirements. To develop an overall rating, the Government’s evaluation will take into account relevant information submitted by each offeror as part of its proposal and the Government’s assessment and evaluation of other sources of information. Offerors are cautioned that the Government may use data provided in the offeror’s proposal and data obtained from other sources. Other sources of information for past performance may include, but are not limited to, CPARS reports, FAPIIS, ESRS, other databases, questionnaires and interviews.
(1) The Government will consider the recency and relevancy of past performance information compared to the requirements detailed in the WI Package, the source of the information, the context of the data and general trends in the offeror’s performance and any associated risk.
(a) To be considered recent, the effort must be on-going and at least 50% complete or must have been performed during the past three (3) years from the date of issuance of the solicitation. Past performance information that fails this condition will not be evaluated.
(b) To be considered relevant, the recent effort must be similar in terms of size, scope, and magnitude in comparison to the requirement detailed in the WI Package. Past performance information that fails this condition will not be evaluated.
(2) The Government will consider the extent of the offeror’s ability to perform a previous contract successfully in the areas of: (a) quality of product or services; (b) timeliness or scheduling of supplies/deliveries; (c) business relations/customer satisfaction; and (d) key personnel and staffing (including subcontractors).
(3) The Government will consider the company itself, predecessor companies, key personnel who have relevant experience, and subcontractors who will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement.
(4) For all offerors, the Government will consider historical compliance with the requirements of FAR Part 52.219-8 (Utilization of Small Business Concerns). In addition, for large business, the Government will consider historical compliance with the requirements of FAR Part 52.219-9 (Small Business Subcontracting Plan) and DFARS 252.219-7003 (Small Business Subcontracting Plan, (DoD Contracts) – Basic). The Government reserves the right to consider Past Performance Questionnaires received after the due date for receipt of proposals. The Go...
Past Performance. ● Please outline the experience your firm has had in performing work ● For each former and/or current project, please include the name of the client and his or her contact information (current and most recent information required, within the last year). ● The quality of the work performed by the Offeror, ● The capability performed by the Offeror, ● The timeliness of the effort of the Offeror, and ● Whether the Client would use Offeror’s services should they have similar needs in the future?
