Common use of Past Performance Clause in Contracts

Past Performance. The past performance evaluation will assess the offeror’s probability of meeting the solicitation requirements. To develop an overall rating, the Government’s evaluation will take into account relevant information submitted by each offeror as part of its proposal and the Government’s assessment and evaluation of other sources of information. Offerors are cautioned that the Government may use data provided in the offeror’s proposal and data obtained from other sources. Other sources of information for past performance may include, but are not limited to, CPARS reports, FAPIIS, ESRS, other databases, questionnaires and interviews. (1) The Government will consider the recency and relevancy of past performance information compared to the requirements detailed in the WI Package, the source of the information, the context of the data and general trends in the offeror’s performance and any associated risk. (a) To be considered recent, the effort must be on-going and at least 50% complete or must have been performed during the past three (3) years from the date of issuance of the solicitation. Past performance information that fails this condition will not be evaluated. (b) To be considered relevant, the recent effort must be similar in terms of size, scope, and magnitude in comparison to the requirement detailed in the WI Package. Past performance information that fails this condition will not be evaluated. (2) The Government will consider the extent of the offeror’s ability to perform a previous contract successfully in the areas of: (a) quality of product or services; (b) timeliness or scheduling of supplies/deliveries; (c) business relations/customer satisfaction; and (d) key personnel and staffing (including subcontractors). (3) The Government will consider the company itself, predecessor companies, key personnel who have relevant experience, and subcontractors who will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement. (4) For all offerors, the Government will consider historical compliance with the requirements of FAR Part 52.219-8 (Utilization of Small Business Concerns). In addition, for large business, the Government will consider historical compliance with the requirements of FAR Part 52.219-9 (Small Business Subcontracting Plan) and DFARS 252.219-7003 (Small Business Subcontracting Plan, (DoD Contracts) – Basic). The Government reserves the right to consider Past Performance Questionnaires received after the due date for receipt of proposals. The Government reserves the right to contact references for verification or additional information and the right to consider other relevant past performance information. The Government may call customers, whether or not provided by the offeror, to inquire about the offerors’ past performance. The Government does not assume the duty to search for data to cure the problems it finds with the information provided by the offeror. The burden of providing thorough and complete past performance information remains with the offeror. In accordance with FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iv), an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available, will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Solicitation, Offer and Award

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Past Performance. The past performance evaluation will assess the offeror’s probability of meeting the solicitation requirements. To develop an overall rating, the Government’s evaluation will take into account relevant information submitted by each offeror as part of its proposal and the Government’s assessment and evaluation of other sources of information. Offerors are cautioned that the Government may use data provided in the offeror’s proposal and data obtained from other sources. Other sources of information for past performance may include, but are not limited to, CPARS reports, FAPIIS, ESRS, other databases, questionnaires and interviews. (1) The Government will consider the recency and relevancy of past performance information compared to the requirements detailed in the WI Package, the source of the information, the context of the data and general trends in the offeror’s performance and any associated risk. (a) To be considered recent, the effort must be on-going and at least 50% complete or must have been performed during the past three (3) years from the date of issuance of the solicitation. Past performance information that fails this condition will not be evaluated. (b) To be considered relevant, the recent effort must be similar in terms of size, scope, magnitude, and magnitude complexity in comparison to the requirement detailed in the WI Package. Past performance information that fails this condition will not be evaluated. (2) The Government will consider the extent of the offeror’s ability to perform a previous contract successfully in the areas of: (a) quality of product or services; (b) timeliness or scheduling of supplies/deliveries; (c) business relations/customer satisfaction; and (d) key personnel and staffing (including subcontractors). (3) The Government will consider the company itself, predecessor companies, key personnel who have relevant experience, and subcontractors who will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement. (4) For all offerors, the Government will consider historical compliance with the requirements of FAR Part 52.219-8 (Utilization of Small Business Concerns). In addition, for large business, the Government will consider historical compliance with the requirements of FAR Part 52.219-9 (Small Business Subcontracting Plan) and DFARS 252.219-7003 (Small Business Subcontracting Plan, (DoD Contracts) – Basic). The Government reserves the right to consider Past Performance Questionnaires received after the due date for receipt of proposals. The Government reserves the right to contact references for verification or additional information and the right to consider other relevant past performance information. The Government may call customers, whether or not provided by the offeror, to inquire about the offerors’ past performance. The Government does not assume the duty to search for data to cure the problems it finds with the information provided by the offeror. The burden of providing thorough and complete past performance information remains with the offeror. In accordance with FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iv), an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available, will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Contract

Past Performance. The past performance evaluation will assess the offeror’s probability of meeting the solicitation requirements. To develop an overall rating, the Government’s evaluation will take into account relevant information submitted by each offeror as part of its proposal and the Government’s assessment and evaluation of other sources of information. Offerors are cautioned that the Government may use data provided in the offeror’s proposal and data obtained from other sources. Other sources of information for past performance may include, but are not limited to, CPARS reports, FAPIIS, ESRS, other databases, questionnaires and interviews. (1) The Government will consider the recency and relevancy of past performance information compared to the requirements detailed in the WI Package, the source of the information, the context of the data and general trends in the offeror’s performance and any associated risk. (a) To be considered recent, the effort must be on-going and at least 50% complete or must have been performed during the past three (3) years from the date of issuance of the solicitation. Past performance information that fails this condition will not be evaluated. (b) To be considered relevant, the recent effort must be similar in terms of size, scope, and magnitude in comparison to the requirement detailed in the WI Package. Past performance information that fails this condition will not be evaluated. (2) The Government will consider the extent of the offeror’s ability to perform a previous contract successfully in the areas of: (a) quality of product or services; (b) timeliness or scheduling of supplies/deliveries; (c) business relations/customer satisfaction; and (d) key personnel and staffing (including subcontractors). (3) The Government will consider the company itself, predecessor companies, key personnel who have relevant experience, and subcontractors who will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement. (4) For all offerors, the Government will consider historical compliance with the requirements of FAR Part 52.219-8 (Utilization of Small Business Concerns). In addition, for large business, the Government will consider historical compliance with the requirements of FAR Part 52.219-9 (Small Business Subcontracting Plan) and DFARS 252.219-7003 (Small Business Subcontracting Plan, (DoD Contracts) – BasicBasic (DEVIATION 2018- O0007)). The Government reserves the right to consider Past Performance Questionnaires received after the due date for receipt of proposals. The Government reserves the right to contact references for verification or additional information and the right to consider other relevant past performance information. The Government may call customers, whether or not provided by the offeror, to inquire about the offerors’ past performance. The Government does not assume the duty to search for data to cure the problems it finds with the information provided by the offeror. The burden of providing thorough and complete past performance information remains with the offeror. In accordance with FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iv), an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available, will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Contract

Past Performance. The past performance evaluation will assess the offeror’s probability of meeting the solicitation requirements. To develop an overall rating, the Government’s evaluation will take into account relevant information submitted by each offeror as part of its proposal and the Government’s assessment and evaluation of other sources of information. Offerors are cautioned that the Government may use data provided in the offeror’s proposal and data obtained from other sources. Other sources of information for past performance may include, but are not limited to, CPARS PPIRS reports, FAPIIS, ESRS, other databases, questionnaires and interviews. (1) The Government will consider the recency recently and relevancy of past performance information compared to the requirements detailed in the WI PackagePWS, the source of the information, the context of the data and general trends in the offeror’s performance and any associated risk. (a) To be considered recent, the effort must be on-going and at least 50% complete or must have been performed during the past three (3) years from the date of issuance of the solicitation. Past performance information that fails this condition will not be evaluated. (b) To be considered relevant, the recent effort must be similar in terms of size, scope, and magnitude in comparison to the requirement detailed in the WI PackageSOW. Past performance information that fails this condition will not be evaluated. (2) The Government will consider the extent of the offeror’s ability to perform a previous contract successfully in the areas of: ; (a) quality of product or services; (b) timeliness or scheduling of supplies/deliveries; (c) business Business relations/customer satisfaction; and (d) key Key personnel and staffing (including subcontractors); and (e) cost controls (COST CONTRACTS ONLY). (3) The Government will consider the company itself, predecessor companies, key personnel who have relevant experience, experience and subcontractors who will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement. (4) For all offerors, the Government will consider historical compliance with the requirements of FAR Part 52.219-8 (Utilization of Small Business Concerns). In addition, for large business, the Government will consider historical compliance with the requirements of FAR Part 52.219-9 (Small Business Subcontracting Plan) and DFARS 252.219-7003 (Small Business Subcontracting Plan, (DoD Contracts) – BasicDOD Requirements). The Government reserves the right to consider Past Performance Questionnaires received after the due date for receipt of proposals. The Government reserves the right to contact references for verification or additional information and the right to consider other relevant past performance information. The Government may call customers, whether or not provided by the offeror, to inquire about the offerors’ past performance. The Government government does not assume the duty to search for data to cure the problems it finds with the information provided by the offeror. The burden of providing thorough and complete past performance information remains with the offeror. In accordance with FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iv), an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available, will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Contract

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Past Performance. The past performance evaluation will assess the offeror’s probability of meeting the solicitation requirements. To develop an overall rating, the Government’s evaluation will take into account relevant information submitted by each offeror as part of its proposal and the Government’s assessment and evaluation of other sources of information. Offerors are cautioned that the Government may use data provided in the offeror’s proposal and data obtained from other sources. Other sources of information for past performance may include, but are not limited to, CPARS PPIRS reports, FAPIIS, ESRS, other databases, questionnaires and interviews. (1) The Government will consider the recency and relevancy of past performance information compared to the requirements detailed in the WI Package, the source of the information, the context of the data and general trends in the offeror’s performance and any associated risk. (a) To be considered recent, the effort must be on-going and at least 50% complete or must have been performed during the past three (3) years from the date of issuance of the solicitation. Past performance information that fails this condition will not be evaluated. (b) To be considered relevant, the recent effort must be similar in terms of size, scope, and magnitude in comparison to the requirement detailed in the WI Package. Past performance information that fails this condition will not be evaluated. (2) The Government will consider the extent of the offeror’s ability to perform a previous contract successfully in the areas of: (a) quality of product or services; (b) timeliness or scheduling of supplies/deliveries; (c) business relations/customer satisfaction; and (d) key personnel and staffing (including subcontractors); and (e) cost controls (COST CONTRACTS ONLY). (3) The Government will consider the company itself, predecessor companies, key personnel who have relevant experience, and subcontractors who will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement. (4) For all offerors, the Government will consider historical compliance with the requirements of FAR Part 52.219-8 (Utilization of Small Business Concerns). In addition, for large business, the Government will consider historical compliance with the requirements of FAR Part 52.219-9 (Small Business Subcontracting Plan) and DFARS 252.219-7003 (Small Business Subcontracting Plan, (DoD Contracts) – Basic). The Government reserves the right to consider Past Performance Questionnaires received after the due date for receipt of proposals. The Government reserves the right to contact references for verification or additional information and the right to consider other relevant past performance information. The Government may call customers, whether or not provided by the offeror, to inquire about the offerors’ past performance. The Government does not assume the duty to search for data to cure the problems it finds with the information provided by the offeror. The burden of providing thorough and complete past performance information remains with the offeror. In accordance with FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iv), an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available, will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Solicitation, Offer and Award

Past Performance. The past performance evaluation will assess the offeror’s probability of meeting the solicitation requirements. To develop an overall rating, the Government’s evaluation will take into account relevant information submitted by each offeror as part of its proposal and the Government’s assessment and evaluation of other sources of information. Offerors are cautioned that the Government may use data provided in the offeror’s offerors proposal and data obtained from other sources. Other sources of information for past performance may include, but are not limited to, CPARS Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) reports, the Federal Awardee performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Report System (ESRS), other databases, questionnaires and interviews. (1) The Government will consider the recency and relevancy of past performance information compared to the requirements detailed in the WI PackagePWS, the source of the information, the context of the data and general trends in the offeror’s performance and any associated risk. (a) To be considered recent, the effort must be on-going and at least 50% complete or must have been performed during the past three (3) years from the date of issuance of the solicitation. Past performance information that fails this condition will not be evaluated. (b) To be considered relevant, the recent effort must be similar in terms of size, scope, and magnitude in comparison to the requirement detailed in the WI PackageSOW. Past performance information that fails this condition will not be evaluated. (2) The Government will consider the extent of the offeror’s ability to perform a previous contract successfully in the areas of: ; (a) quality of product or services; (b) timeliness or scheduling of supplies/deliveries; (c) business Business relations/customer satisfaction; and (d) key Key personnel and staffing (including subcontractors); and (e) cost controls (COST CONTRACTS ONLY). (3) The Government will consider the company itself, predecessor companies, key personnel who have relevant experience, experience and subcontractors who will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement. (4) For all offerors, the Government will consider historical compliance with the requirements of FAR Part 52.219-8 (Utilization of Small Business Concerns). In addition, for large business, the Government will consider historical compliance with the requirements of FAR Part 52.219-9 (Small Business Subcontracting Plan) and DFARS 252.219-7003 (Small Business Subcontracting Plan, (DoD Contracts) – BasicDOD Requirements). The Government reserves the right to consider Past Performance Questionnaires received after the due date for receipt of proposals. The Government reserves the right to contact references for verification or additional information and the right to consider other relevant past performance information. The Government may call customers, whether or not provided by the offeror, to inquire about the offerors’ past performance. The Government government does not assume the duty to search for data to cure the problems it finds with the information provided by the offeror. The burden of providing thorough and complete past performance information remains with the offeror. In accordance with FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iv), an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available, will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance. 5. Price Proposal Price proposals will not be assigned an adjectival rating, but shall be evaluated for completeness and price reasonableness utilizing one or more of the process analysis techniques in FAR 15.404-1(b). The total evaluated proposal price will consist of Category “A” Items (CLIN 0001), Additional Government Requirements (CLIN 0002), Other Direct Costs (CLIN 0002), Category “B” Items (CLIN 0003 through 00XX), and the Interport Differential, if applicable.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Contract

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!