Peer-Review of Primary Research Sample Clauses

Peer-Review of Primary Research. Findings from PCORI-funded research must be peer reviewed in accordance with PCORI’s legislative mandate. As approved in advance by PCORI, such peer review process may include PCORI’s own peer-review process, publication in a peer-reviewed medical journal, and/or Recipient’s own peer-review process, to the extent consistent with PCORI’s legislative mandate.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Peer-Review of Primary Research. Consistent with PCORI’s Authorizing Law, PCORI is required to ensure there is a process for peer- review of primary research that is funded by PCORI that fulfills requirements of the Authorizing Law. To the extent, if any, that Recipient conducts primary research subject to PCORI’s Authorizing Law using PCORI funds for a Project, Recipient will cooperate with PCORI to ensure the primary research is peer-reviewed in compliance with the Authorizing Law and the PCORI Peer Review Findings Release Process adopted by the PCORI Board of Governors consistent with the Authorizing Law. The PCORI Peer Review and Findings Release Process required to meet PCORI’s Authorizing Law may be in addition to peer review processes for other purposes, such as for purposes of journal publication, as long as such other peer review processes are consistent with the obligations of Recipient under this Agreement.
Sample 1

Related to Peer-Review of Primary Research

  • Peer Review Dental Group, after consultation with the Joint ----------- Operations Committee, shall implement, regularly review, modify as necessary or appropriate and obtain the commitment of Providers to actively participate in peer review procedures for Providers. Dental Group shall assist Manager in the production of periodic reports describing the results of such procedures. Dental Group shall provide Manager with prompt notice of any information that raises a reasonable risk to the health and safety of Group Patients or Beneficiaries. In any event, after consultation with the Joint Operations Committee, Dental Group shall take such action as may be reasonably warranted under the facts and circumstances.

  • Additional RO Review Criteria (1) In addition to the requirements in Subparagraph 34A, the RO must:

  • Power Factor Design Criteria Developer shall design the Large Generating Facility to maintain an effective power delivery at demonstrated maximum net capability at the Point of Interconnection at a power factor within the range established by the Connecting Transmission Owner on a comparable basis, until NYISO has established different requirements that apply to all generators in the New York Control Area on a comparable basis. The Developer shall design and maintain the plant auxiliary systems to operate safely throughout the entire real and reactive power design range. The Connecting Transmission Owner shall not unreasonably restrict or condition the reactive power production or absorption of the Large Generating Facility in accordance with Good Utility Practice.

  • Multi-year Planning Targets Schedule A may reflect an allocation for the first Funding Year of this Agreement as well as planning targets for up to two additional years, consistent with the term of this Agreement. In such an event, the HSP acknowledges that if it is provided with planning targets, these targets:

  • Technology Research Analyst Job# 1810 General Characteristics Maintains a strong understanding of the enterprise’s IT systems and architectures. Assists in the analysis of the requirements for the enterprise and applying emerging technologies to support long-term business objectives. Responsible for researching, collecting, and disseminating information on emerging technologies and key learnings throughout the enterprise. Researches and recommends changes to foundation architecture. Supports research projects to identify and evaluate emerging technologies. Interfaces with users and staff to evaluate possible implementation of the new technology in the enterprise, consistent with the goal of improving existing systems and technologies and in meeting the needs of the business. Analyzes and researches process of deployment and assists in this process.

  • Criteria for Performance Assessment A. A teacher’s performance shall be assessed based on the criteria set forth in the evaluation instrument, Appendix D.

  • ADB’s Review of Procurement Decisions 9. All contracts procured under international competitive bidding procedures and contracts for consulting services shall be subject to prior review by ADB, unless otherwise agreed between the Borrower and ADB and set forth in the Procurement Plan. SCHEDULE 5

  • REVIEW OF THE FRAMEWORK PRICES LOTS 1 – 10

  • Terms of Reference of the Investigator (a) The purpose of the investigator will be to ascertain facts.

  • SCHEDULE FOR PERFORMANCE REVIEWS 8.1 The performance of each Employee in relation to his/her performance agreement shall be reviewed on the following dates with the understanding that reviews in the first and third quarter may be verbal if performance is satisfactory:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.