Common use of Performance Confidence Assessment Clause in Contracts

Performance Confidence Assessment. The final step is for the team to arrive at a single consensus performance confidence assessment for the Offeror, selecting the most appropriate rating from the chart below. This rating considers the assessed quality of the relevant/recent efforts gathered to include utilization of small business assessment. Ensure the rationale for the conclusions reached are included. Performance Confidence Assessments Rating Method Adjectival Rating Description Substantial Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. Satisfactory Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. Neutral Confidence No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. The offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance. Limited Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. No Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Performance Confidence Assessment. The final step is for the team to arrive at a single consensus performance confidence assessment for the Offeror, selecting the most appropriate rating from the chart below. This rating considers the assessed quality next aspect of the past performance evaluation will be to determine how well the contractor performed on the contracts determined to be at least somewhat relevant/. The performance assessment utilizes CPAR data along with questionnaires (as described in Section L) and direct contact with references in order to gather information from customers on how well the Offeror performed past contracts. Once Relevancy and Performance Assessment have been established for each recent efforts gathered to include utilization and relevant contract action, each Offeror will be assigned an overall Past Performance Confidence Rating using one of small business assessment. Ensure the rationale for the conclusions reached are included. following ratings: Table Three: Performance Confidence Assessments Rating Method Adjectival Rating Description Definition Substantial Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government theGovernment has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. Satisfactory Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. Neutral Confidence No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. The offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance. Limited Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. No Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort... DRAFT

Performance Confidence Assessment. The final step is for the team to arrive at In conducting a single consensus performance confidence assessment for the Offerorassessment, selecting the most appropriate rating from the chart below. This rating considers the assessed quality each Offeror shall be assigned one of the relevant/recent efforts gathered to include utilization of small business assessmentratings in Table M.2.1.4.1-1. Ensure the rationale for the conclusions reached are includedDescription Rating Table M.2.1.4.1-1. Performance Confidence Assessments Rating Method Adjectival Rating Description Assessment Ratings Substantial Confidence Based on the offerorOfferor’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror Offeror will successfully perform the required effort. Satisfactory Confidence Based on the offerorOfferor’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has Satisfactory Confidence Neutral Confidence a reasonable expectation that the offeror Offeror will successfully perform the required effort. Neutral Confidence No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offerorOfferor’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. The offeror Offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance. Limited Confidence Based on the offerorOfferor’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror Offeror will successfully perform the required effort. No Confidence Based on the offerorOfferor’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has No Confidence no expectation that the offeror Offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Performance Confidence Assessment. The final step is for the team to arrive at a single consensus performance confidence assessment for the Offerorofferor, selecting the most appropriate rating from the chart below. This rating considers the assessed quality of the relevant/recent efforts gathered to include utilization of small business assessmentgathered. Ensure the rationale for the conclusions reached are included. Performance Confidence Assessments Rating Method Adjectival Rating Description Substantial Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. Satisfactory Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. Neutral Confidence No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. The offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance. Limited Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. No Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Performance Confidence Assessment. The final step is for the team to arrive at a single consensus performance confidence assessment for the Offerorofferor, selecting the most appropriate rating from the chart below. This rating considers the assessed quality of the relevant/recent efforts gathered to include utilization of small business assessmentgathered. Ensure the rationale for the conclusions reached are included. Performance Confidence Assessments Rating Method Adjectival Rating Description Substantial Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. Satisfactory Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. Neutral Confidence No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. The offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance. Limited Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. No Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort. Unknown Confidence (Neutral) No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.

Performance Confidence Assessment. The final step is for As a result of the team to arrive at a single consensus relevancy and quality assessments of the recent contracts evaluated, Offerors will receive an integrated performance confidence assessment rating. The resulting performance confidence assessment rating is made at the past performance factor level and represents an overall evaluation of contractor performance. Offerors without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance and, as a result, will receive an "Neutral Confidence" rating for the Offerorpast performance factor. For evaluation purposes, selecting the most appropriate a “Substantial Confidence” or “Satisfactory Confidence” past performance rating from the chart belowis worth more than a “Neutral Confidence” past performance rating. This rating considers the assessed quality The past performance factor will receive one of the relevant/recent efforts gathered to include utilization of small business assessmentperformance confidence assessments described in the DoD Source Selection Procedures, paragraph 3.1.3.3. Ensure the rationale for the conclusions reached are included. Performance Confidence Assessments Rating Method Adjectival TABLE 5- PERFORMANCE CONFIDENCE ASSESSMENTS Rating Description Substantial Confidence SUBSTANTIAL CONFIDENCE Based on the offerorOfferor’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror Offeror will successfully perform the required effort. Satisfactory Confidence SATISFACTORY CONFIDENCE Based on the offerorOfferor’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror Offeror will successfully perform the required effort. Neutral Confidence UNKOWN (NEUTRAL) CONFIDENCE No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offerorOfferor’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. The offeror Offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance. Limited Confidence LIMITED CONFIDENCE Based on the offerorOfferor’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror Offeror will successfully perform the required effort. No Confidence NO CONFIDENCE Based on the offerorOfferor’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror Offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Performance Confidence Assessment. The final step is for the team to arrive at a single consensus performance confidence assessment for the Offeror, selecting the most appropriate rating from the chart below. This rating considers the assessed quality next aspect of the past performance evaluation will be to determine how well the contractor performed on the contracts determined to be at least somewhat relevant/. The performance assessment utilizes CPAR data along with questionnaires (as described in Section L) and direct contact with references in order to gather information from customers on how well the Offeror performed past contracts. Once Relevancy and Performance Assessment have been established for each recent efforts gathered to include utilization and relevant contract action, each Offeror will be assigned an overall Past Performance Confidence Rating using one of small business assessment. Ensure the rationale for the conclusions reached are included. following ratings: Table Three: Performance Confidence Assessments Rating Method Adjectival Rating Description Definition Substantial Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government theGovernment has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. Satisfactory Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully willsuccessfully perform the required effort. Neutral Confidence No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. The offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance. Limited Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. No Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort... DRAFT