Common use of Performance Review for Criteria Architect Clause in Contracts

Performance Review for Criteria Architect. The Judicial Council or its agent may evaluate Criteria Architect’s performance under this Agreement. Such evaluation may include assessing Criteria Architect’s compliance with all Agreement terms and performance standards. Any deficiencies in the Criteria Architect’s performance that the Judicial Council reasonably determines are severe or continuing and compromises the quality of Criteria Architect’s Work if not corrected, will be reported to the Criteria Architect’s principal. The report may include recommended improvements and corrective measures to be taken by the Criteria Architect. If the Criteria Architect’s performance remains unsatisfactory as determined by the Judicial Council in its sole discretion, the Judicial Council may, without limitation, terminate this Agreement for cause or impose other penalties as specified in this Agreement. Any evaluation of Criteria Architect’s performance conducted by the Judicial Council shall not be construed as an Acceptance of the Criteria Architect’s work product or methods of performance. Criteria Architect shall be solely responsible for the quality, completeness, and accuracy of the work product that Criteria Architect and its Sub-Consultants deliver under this Agreement. Criteria Architect shall not rely on Judicial Council to perform any quality control review of Criteria Architect’s work product, as such review shall be conducted by Criteria Architect.

Performance Review for Criteria Architect. The 10.1.1 Judicial Council or its agent may evaluate Criteria Architect’s performance under this Agreement. Such evaluation may include assessing Criteria Architect’s compliance with all Agreement terms and performance standards. Any deficiencies in the Criteria Architect’s performance that the Judicial Council reasonably determines are severe or continuing continuing, and that compromises the quality of Criteria Architect’s Work if not corrected, will be reported to the Criteria Architect’s principal. The report may include recommended improvements and corrective measures to be taken by the Criteria Architect. If the Criteria Architect’s performance remains unsatisfactory as determined by the Judicial Council in its sole discretion, the Judicial Council may, without limitation, terminate this Agreement for cause or impose other penalties as specified in this Agreement. Any evaluation of Criteria Architect’s performance conducted by the Judicial Council shall not be construed as an Acceptance of the Criteria Architect’s work product or methods of performance. Criteria Architect shall be solely responsible for the quality, completeness, and accuracy of the work product that Criteria Architect and its Sub-Consultants Subconsultants deliver under this Agreement. Criteria Architect shall not rely on Judicial Council to perform any quality control review of Criteria Architect’s work product, as such review shall be conducted by Criteria Architect.Article 11.‌