Common use of Plant F10 Clause in Contracts

Plant F10. ISSUES: San Xxxxxxx proposed to install a new booster flow meter and security camera at Plant F10 for a total requested cost of $55,000. DRA recommended disallowing this project on grounds that the flow meter cost should be recorded to San Gabriel’s Operation and Maintenance Costs for the F10 Treatment Facility memorandum account and recovered from the County of San Bernardino. XXX also recommended San Xxxxxxx purchase security cameras by securing Proposition 50 funds. RESOLUTION: XXX agrees to San Gabriel’s original request. The Parties agree to San Gabriel’s position regarding the booster flow meter because San Gabriel clarified that the new booster flow meter is not part of the operation of the treatment facility or treatment process at Plant F10 and therefore is not recoverable from the County of San Bernardino. The Parties further agree to San Gabriel’s position regarding the installation of a security camera because Proposition 50 funds are no longer available to fund the request. Issue SGV Direct SGV Rebuttal DRA Report Difference Settlement Plant F10 (2008-12) $55,000 $55,000 $0 $55,000 $55,000 REFERENCES: Exhibit SG-12 (Yucelen), Attachment B, Section Plant F10; Exhibit DRA-1 (Xxxxx), pp. 7-7 to 7-9; Exhibit SG-25 (Yucelen), pp. 4-5.

Plant F10. ISSUES: San Xxxxxxx proposed to install a new booster flow meter and security camera at Plant F10 for a total requested cost of $55,000. DRA recommended disallowing this project on grounds that the flow meter cost should be recorded to San Gabriel’s Operation and Maintenance Costs for the F10 Treatment Facility memorandum account and recovered from the County of San Bernardino. XXX DRA also recommended San Xxxxxxx purchase security cameras by securing Proposition 50 funds. RESOLUTION: XXX agrees to San Gabriel’s original request. The Parties agree to San Gabriel’s position regarding the booster flow meter because San Gabriel Xxx Xxxxxxx clarified that the new booster flow meter is not part of the operation of the treatment facility or treatment process at Plant F10 and therefore is not recoverable from the County of San Bernardino. The Parties further agree to San Gabriel’s position regarding the installation of a security camera because Proposition 50 funds are no longer available to fund the request. Issue SGV Direct SGV Rebuttal DRA Report Difference Settlement Plant F10 (2008-12) $55,000 $55,000 $0 $55,000 $55,000 REFERENCES: Exhibit SG-12 (Yucelen), Attachment B, Section Plant F10; Exhibit DRA-1 (Xxxxx), pp. 7-7 to 7-9; Exhibit SG-25 (Yucelen), pp. 4-5.