Post-Processing Clause Samples

The Post-processing clause defines the obligations and procedures that parties must follow after the main services or contractual relationship have ended. Typically, this clause outlines how data, materials, or confidential information should be returned, deleted, or otherwise handled once the agreement concludes. For example, a service provider may be required to securely erase client data or return physical documents within a specified timeframe. The core function of this clause is to ensure a clear and secure transition at the end of the contract, protecting sensitive information and clarifying each party’s responsibilities after termination.
Post-Processing. A round of experiment is done when all parties send the fully passive signals and re- ceive ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇’s detection announcement. After a large number of rounds are performed, the first party, A0, pub- licly announce a random binary sequence that decides if the corresponding round is a key generation (KG) round or a parameter estimation (PE) round, with probabili- ties pX and 1 pX , respectively. One key advantage of our fully passive CKA protocol is that there is no basis sifting across multiple users, as each other user simply chooses the same publicly-announced basis as ▇▇▇▇▇ after the transmission. This is because, for our protocol, both the KG and PE round use the same physical signal, and the difference lies only in post-processing, which can be done after the transmission. This is especially advanta- geous when the number of users is large. For NU users, the advantage of sifting efficiency over an active CKA scheme is pNU −1. 2a) KG round: Each party, Ai, divides the whole 2π range into M slices where M must be an even number, and each of their local phase measurements should land into one of the slices indexed ki1 and ki2. A KG round is successful only when the slice indices obey ki1 = ki2 = 1 for all i, or ki1 = ki2 = M/2 + 1 for all i. The top slice corresponds to the plus state in X-basis, and hence corresponds to a classical bit 0, and the bottom slice cor- responds to the minus state in X-basis, and hence corre- sponds to a classical bit 1. The unsuccessful events are discarded. This post-selection method discards the ma- jority of the signals, resulting in very low sifting. How- ever, we will show in the following sections that the dis- carded signals can contribute to the key rate. For now, to introduce the protocol clearly, we do not yet consider other signals. 2b) PE round: Each party, Ai, calculates their local phase differences, ϕi1 ϕi2 , this is equivalent to find- ing their output signal intensity in the range between 0 and umax. For example, in a 3-decoy protocol, each party divides their intensity range into 3 parts. Each party announces which part their signal falls into based on ϕi1 ϕi2 . In this way, all n parties essentially di- vide an n-dimensional square into small squares, each square, labeled Sijkl, corresponds to a decoy state choice by all parties. They perform decoy-state analysis to es- timate the yield, Yn1n2n3n4 , and subsequently calculate
View Source
Post-Processing. The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for all post- processing of all data.
View Source
Post-Processing. (1) All delivered images will have at least the base post-processing applied. (2) Basic post-processing is considered: a) Brightness correction b) Contrast correction c) Color or black-and-white correction d) White balance correction
View Source
Post-Processing 
View Source

Related to Post-Processing

  • Payment Processing Citizens may require any other information from Vendor that Citizens deems necessary to verify any compensation request placed under this Agreement and Vendor agrees that it will provide such information as reasonably requested by Citizens. Payment shall be due net thirty (30) calendar days of Citizens’ actual receipt of a complete and undisputed invoice. Where a submitted invoice is incomplete, such as not containing the information described in this Section, Citizens will return the incomplete invoice to Vendor for correction within thirty (30) calendar days of Citizens’ actual receipt of such invoice. Where Citizens reasonably disputes any part of a complete invoice, such as the amount of the compensation request, Citizens shall pay any undisputed portion of the invoiced amount within (30) calendar days of Citizens’ actual receipt of the complete invoice and will describe the basis for the disputed portion of the invoiced amount. Where Vendor disagrees with Citizens dispute of any invoice, the Parties shall seek to resolve the dispute in accordance with the Dispute Resolution Process further described in this Agreement. In no case shall Citizens be subject to late payment interest charges where Vendor has submitted an incomplete invoice or where Citizens has reasonably disputed an invoice. Where Vendor fails to submit an invoice within twelve (12) calendar months of the Services for which compensation is being requested, Vendor acknowledges and agrees that any payment due for such Services is forfeited by Vendor for its failure to timely submit an invoice.

  • Data Processing In this clause:

  • Sub-Processing 10.1 In respect of any Processing of Personal Data performed by a third party on behalf of a Party, that Party shall: (a) carry out adequate due diligence on such third party to ensure that it is capable of providing the level of protection for the Personal Data as is required by the contract, and provide evidence of such due diligence to the other Party where reasonably requested; and (b) ensure that a suitable agreement is in place with the third party as required under applicable Data Protection Legislation.

  • Subprocessing The data importer shall not subcontract any of its processing operations performed on behalf of the data exporter under the Clauses without the prior written consent of the data exporter. Where the data importer subcontracts its obligations under the Clauses, with the consent of the data exporter, it shall do so only by way of a written agreement with the subprocessor which imposes the same obligations on the subprocessor as are imposed on the data importer under the Clauses. Where the subprocessor fails to fulfil its data protection obligations under such written agreement the data importer shall remain fully liable to the data exporter for the performance of the subprocessor's obligations under such agreement.

  • Claims Processing BCBSM will process Provider's Clean Claims submitted in accordance with this Agreement in a timely fashion.